Wetland mapping with LiDAR derivatives, SAR polarimetric decompositions, and LiDAR–SAR fusion using a random forest classifier

References

• Baghdadi, N., Bernier, M., Gautheri, R. and Neeson, I. Evaluation of C-band SAR data for wetlands mapping. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 2001. Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 71-88. doi: 10.1080/014311601750038857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven, K.J. and Kirkby, M.J. A physically-based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin. 1979. Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 43-69. doi: 10.1080/02626667909491834
   Google Scholar
• Bohner, J. and Selige, T. Spatial prediction of soil attributes using terrain analysis and climate regionalization. Gottinger Geograpihsche Abhandlungen. 2002. Vol. 115, pp. 13-28.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. 1996. Out-of-bag estimation, Technical Report. Statistics Department, University of California. Berkeley, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. Out-of-bag estimation, Technical Report. Statistics Department, University of California. Berkeley, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J. and Paelinckx, D. Evaluation of Random Forest and Adaboost tree-base ensemble classification and spectral band selection for ecotop mapping using airborne hyperspectral imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2008. Vol. 112, pp. 2999-3011. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschamps, B., McNairn, H., Shang, J. and Jiao, S. Towards operational radar-only crop type classification: comparison of a traditional decision tree with random forest classifier. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. 2012. Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 60-68. doi: 10.5589/m12-012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Uriate, R. and Alvarez des Andres, S. Gene selection and classification of micro-array data using random forest. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006. Vol. 7, pp. 3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duro, D., Franklin, S. and Dube, M. A comparison of pixel based and object based image analysis with selected machine learning algorithms for the classification of agricultural landscapes using SPOT-5 HRG imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment. 2012a. Vol. 118, pp. 259-272. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duro, D., Franklin, S. and Monique, D. Multi-scale object-based image analysis and feature selection of multi-sensor earth observation imagery using random forests. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 2012b. Vol. 33, No. 14, pp. 4501-4562. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2011.649864
   Google Scholar
• Feuillet, T., Mercier, D., Decaulne, A. and Cossart, E. Classification of sorted patterned ground areas based on their environmental characteristics (Skagafjordur, Northern Iceland). Geomorphology. 2012. Vol. 139–141, pp. 577-587. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.12.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frolking, S., Roulet, N., Moore, T., Lafleur, P., Bubier, J. and Crill, P. Modeling seasonal to annual carbon balance of Mer Bleue Bog, Ontario, Canada. Global Biogeochemical Cycles. 2002. Vol. 16, No. 3, doi: 10.1029/2001GB001457
   Google Scholar
• Garroway, K., Hopkinson, C. and Jamieson, R. Surface moisture and vegetation influences on lidar intensity data in an agricultural watershed. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. 2011. Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 275-284. doi: 10.5589/m11-036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghmire, B., Rogan, J. and Miller, J. Contextual land-cover classification: incorporating spatial dependence in land-cover classification models using random forests and the Getis statistic. Remote Sensing Letters. 2010. Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 45-54. doi: 10.1080/01431160903252327
   Google Scholar
• Gislason, P., Benediktsson, J. and Sveinsson, J. Random Forests for land cover classification. Pattern Recognition Letters. 2006. Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 294-300. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorham, E. Northern Peatlands: Role in the carbon cycle and probably consequences of climate warming. Ecological Applications. 1991. Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 182-195. doi: 10.2307/1941811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan, H., Yu, J. and Luo, L. Random forests-based feature selection for land use classification using LiDAR data and orthoimagery. International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 2012. Vol. XXXIX-B7, pp. 203-208.
   Google Scholar
• Ham, J., Chen, Y. and Crawford, M. Investigation of the Random Forest Framework for Classification of Hyperspectral Data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 2005. Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 492-500. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2004.842481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. and Bryant, R. A multi-scale remotesensing approach for monitoring northern peatland hydrology: Present possibilities and future challenges. Journal of Environmental Management. 2009. Vol. 90, No. 7, pp. 2178-2188. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, F. and Lewis, A. Radar detection of wetland ecosystems: A review. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 2008. Vol. 29, No. 20, pp. 5809-5835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hengle, T., and Reuter, H. 2009. Geomorphometry: concepts, software, applications. Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkinson, C., Chasmer, L., Sass, G., Creed, I., Sitar, M., Kalbfleisch, W. and Treitz, P. Vegetation class dependent errors in lidar ground elevation and canopy height estimates in boreal wetland environment. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. 2005. Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 191-206. doi: 10.5589/m05-007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkinson, C., Chasmer, L., Lim, K., Treitz, P. and Creed, I. Towards a universal lidar canopy height indicator. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. 2006. Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 139-152. doi: 10.5589/m06-006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horning N. (2010). Random forests: an algorithm for image classification and generation of continuous fields data sets. In: Proceeding of the International Conference on Geoinformatics for Spatial Infrastructure Development in Earth and Allied Sciences. Hanoi (Vietnam) 9–11 Dec 2010. Japan–Vietnam Geoinformatics Consortium, Institute for Environment and Resources, Vietnam.
   Google Scholar
• Hudak, A., Crookston, N., Evans, J., Falkowski, M., Smith, A., Gessler, P. and Morgan, P. Regression modeling and mapping of coniferous forest basal area and tree density from discrete-return lidar and multispectral satellite data. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. 2006. Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 126-138. doi: 10.5589/m06-007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korpela, I., Koskinen, M., Vasander, H., Holopainen, M. and Minkkinwn, K. Airborne small footprint discrete return LiDAR data in the assessment of boreal mire surface patterns, vegetation and habitats. Forest Ecology and Management. 2009. Vol. 258, pp. 1549-1566. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafleur, P., Roulet, N. and Admiral, S. Annual cycle of CO2 exchange at a bog peatland. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2001. Vol. 10, No. D3, pp. 3071-3081. doi: 10.1029/2000JD900588
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R., Wood, S. and Sheley, R. Mapping invasive plants using hyperspectral imagery and Breiman Culter Classifications (RandomForest). Remote Sensing of Environment. 2006. Vol. 100, pp. 356-362. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Chen, W. and Touzi, R. Optimum RADARSAT-1 configurations for wetland discrimination: a case study of Mer Bleue peat bog. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. 2007. Vol. 33, No. Supp.1, pp. S45-S55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liaw, A. and Wiener, M. Classification and Regression by randomForest. R News. 2002. Vol. 2/3, pp. 18-22.
   Google Scholar
• Liaw, A. 2012. Package “randomForest”. Online. Available: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/randomForest/randomForest.pdf, [accessed 23 September 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Miao, X., Heaton, J., Zheng, S., Charlet, D. and Liu, H. Applying tree-based ensemble algorithms to the classification of ecological zones using multi-temporal multi-source remote sensing data. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 2012. Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 1823-1849. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2011.602651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millard, K., Redden, A., Webster, T. and Stewart, H. The Use of GIS and High Resolution LiDAR in Salt Marsh Restoration Site Suitability Assessments in the Upper Bay of Fundy. Wetlands Ecology and Management. 2013. Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 243-262. doi: 10.1007/s11273-013-9303-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Capital Commission (NCC) 2005. Eco_forest dataset. Ottawa, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Ozesmi, S. and Bauer, M. Satellite remote sensing of wetlands. Wetlands ecology and management. 2002. Vol. 10, pp. 381-402.
   Google Scholar
• Pal, M. Random Forest classifier for remote sensing classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 2005. Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 217-222. doi: 10.1080/01431160412331269698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
   Google Scholar
• R Statistics 2013. Online. Available: http://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-patched/library/graphics/html/boxplot.html, [accessed 14 May 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Racine , M.Bernier, M. and style="western">Ouarda, T. 2005. Evaluation of RADARSAT-1 images acquired in fine mode for the study of boreal peatlands: a case study in James Bay. Canada. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 450467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M., Mitchell, C., Branfireun, B. and Kilka, R. Analysis of airborne LiDAR surveys to quantify the characteristic morphologies of northern forested wetlands. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2010. Vol. 115, No. G03005,
   Google Scholar
• Sonnentag, O., Chen, J., Roulet, N., Ju, W. and Govind, A. Spatially explicit simulation of peatland hydrology and carbon dioxide exchange: Influence of mesoscale topography. Journal of Geophysical Research. 2008. Vol. 113, doi: 10.1029/2007JG000605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobl, C., Boulesteix, T., Kneib, T., Augustin, T. and Zeileis, A. Conditional variable importance for random forests. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008. Vol. 9, pp. 307. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torbick, N., Persson, A., Olefeld, D., Frolking, S., Salas, W., Hagen, S., Crill, P. and Li, C. Remote Sensing. 2012. Vol. 4, pp. 1974-1994.
   Google Scholar
• Touzi, R. and Charboneau, F. PWS: a friendly and effective tool for polarimetric image analysis. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing. 2004. Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 566-571. doi: 10.5589/m04-017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touzi, R. Target Scattering Decomposition in Terms of Roll-invariant target parameters. IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing. 2007. Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 73-84. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2006.886176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touzi, R., Deschamps, A. and Rother, G. Phase Target Scattering for Wetland Characterization Using Polarimetric C-Band SAR. IEEE Trasactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 2009. Vol. 47, No. 9, pp. 3241-3261. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2009.2018626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toyra, J., Peitroniro, A., Martz, L. and Prowse, D. A multi sensor approach to wetland flood monitoring. Hydrological Processes. 2002. Vol. 16, pp. 1569-1581. doi: 10.1002/hyp.1021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetlands International 2012. Canada 33:Mer Bleue Conservation Area Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands [online] Available From: http://www.wetlands.org/reports/ris/4CA033en.pdf. [cited 8 August 2012]
   Google Scholar
• Waddington, J., Quinton, W., Price, J. and Lafleur, P. Advances in Canadian Peatland Hydrology, 2003–2007. Canada Water Resources Journal. 2009. Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 139-148. doi: 10.4296/cwrj3402139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waske, B. and Braun, M. Classifier ensembles for land cover mapping using multitemporal SAR imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 2009. Vol. 64, pp. 450-457. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehr, A. and Lohr, U. Airborne laser scanning - an introduction and overview. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 1999. Vol. 54, pp. 68-82. doi: 10.1016/S0924-2716(99)00011-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitfield, P., van der Kamp, G. and St-Hillaire, A. Introduction to peatlands special issue: improving hydrologic prediction in Canadian peatlands. Canadian Water Resources Journal. 2009. Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 202-310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Roulet, N., Moore, T., Lafleur, P. and Humphreys, E. Dealing with microtopography of an ombrotrophic bog for simulating ecosystem level CO2 exchanges. Ecological Modeling. 2011. Vol. 222, pp. 1038-1047. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., Sha, Z. and Yu, M. 2008 Remote sensing imagery in vegetation mapping: a review Journal of Plant Ecology 1 1 9 23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar