The role of morphometric parameters in Digital Terrain Models interpolation accuracy: a case study

References

• Aguilar F.J., Agüera F., Aguilar M.A., Carvajal F. (2005)—Effects of terrain morphology, sampling density, and interpolation methods on grid DEM accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 71: 805–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselmo V., Godone F. (1976)—A method for drawing slope maps from aerial photographs. Bollettino Società Geologica Italiana, 95: 75–79.
   Google Scholar
• Baltsavias E.P. (1999)—Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54 (2–3): 199–214. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716(99)00015-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bater C.W., Coops N.C. (2009)—Evaluating error associated with lidar-derived DEM interpolation. Computers & Geosciences, 35 (2): 289–300. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth B. (2000)—Using ArcGIS 3D Analyst. Environmental Systems Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Booth A.M., Roering J.J., Perron J.T. (2009)—Automated landslide mapping using spectral analysis and high-resolution topographic data: Puget Sound lowlands, Washington, and Portland Hills, Oregon. Geomorphology, 109: 132–147. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.02.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasington J., Rumsby B.T., McVey R.A. (2000)—Monitoring and modelling morphological change in a braided gravel-bed river using highresolution GPS-based survey. Earth Surface Proceses and Landforms, 25: 973–990. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1096-9837(200008)25:9<973::AID-ESP111>3.0.CO;2-Y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. (2001)—Random forests. Machine Learning, 45 (1): 5–32. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L., Friedman J.H., Olshen R.A., Stone. C.J. (1984)—Classification and Regression Trees. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Burrough P.A. (1981)—Fractal dimensions of landscapes and other environmental data. Nature, 294: 240–242. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/294240a0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrough PA., McDonnell R.A. (1998)—Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Carlisle B.H. (2005)—Modelling the Spatial Distribution of DEM Error. Transactions in GIS, 9: 521–540. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2005.00233.x.
   Google Scholar
• Carter J. (1988)—Digital representations of topographic surfaces. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 54: 1577–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalli M., Marchi L. (2008)—Characterisation of the surface morphology of an alpine alluvial fan using airborne LiDAR. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 8: 323–333. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/nhess-8-323-2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalli M., Tarolli P., Marchi L., Dalla Fontana G. (2008)—The effectiveness of airborne LiDAR data in the recognition of channel-bed morphology. Catena, 73: 249–260. doi: http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.catena.2007.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceaglio E., Freppaz M., Maggioni M., Filippa G., Godone D., Zanini E. (2010)—Full-depth avalanches and soil erosion: an experimental site in nw Italy. Copernicus GMBH on behalf of the EGU, Vienna, European Geoscience Union, 2–7/05/2010, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Chaplot V., Darboux F., Bourennane H., Leguédois S., Silvera N., Phachomphon K. (2006)—Accuracy of interpolation techniques for the derivation of digital elevation models in relation to landform types and data density. Geomorphology, 77 (1–2): 126–141. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins S.H. (1973)—Terrain parameters directly from a digital terrain model. Publication of: American Congress on Surveying and Mapping, pp. 403–18.
   Google Scholar
• Cressie N.A. (1991)—Statistics for spatial data. John Wiley, New York, pp. 920.
   Google Scholar
• Drăguţ L., Eisank C, Strasser T. (2011)—Local variance for multi-scale analysis in geomorphometry. Geomorphology, 130 (3–4): 162–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher P. (1998)—Improved modelling of elevation error with geostatistics. Geoinformatica, 2: 215–233. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009717704255.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher P.F., Tate N.J. (2006)—Causes and consequences of error in digital elevation models. Progress in Physical Geography, 30: 467–489. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0309133306pp492ra.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman E., Frescino T. (2009)—ModelMap: Modeling and Map production using Random Forest and Stochastic Gradient Boosting. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 507 25th street, Ogden, UT, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gessler P., Pike R., MacMillan R.A., Hengl T., Reuter H.I. (2009) -The Future of Geomorphometry. in: Hengl T., Reuter H. I. (Eds.), Geomorphometry—Concepts, Software, Applications, Developments in Soil Science. Elsevier, 33: 637–652. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2481(08)00028-7.
   Google Scholar
• Gloersen E., Grimm J., Hill A., Lindner C., Lochl M., Schurmann C. (2004)—Mountain Areas in Europe: Delineation, Database and Analysis. Proceedings of GISRUK Conference 28–30/4/2004, University of East Anglia, Norwich (UK), pp. 92–97.
   Google Scholar
• Gousie M.B., Franklin W.R. (2005)—Augmenting grid-based contours to improve thin plate dem generation. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 71: 69–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guindon B., Goodenough D.G., Teillet P.M. (1981)—The role of digital terrain models in the remote sensing of forests, pp. 401.
   Google Scholar
• Guo Q., Li W., Yu H., Alvarez O. (2010)—Effects of topographic variability and lidar sampling density on several DEM interpolation methods. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 76 (6): 701–712.
   Google Scholar
• Hartkamp A.D., De Beurs K., Stein A., White J.W. (1999)—Interpolation Techniques for Climate Variables. NRG-GIS Series 99–01. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage G.L., Milan D.J., Large A.R.G., Fuller I.C. (2009)—Influence of survey strategy and interpolation model on DEM quality. Geomorphology, 112 (3–4): 334–344. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.06.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hessl A., Miller J., Kernan J., Keenum D., McKenzie D. (2007)—Mapping Paleo-Fire Boundaries from Binary Point Data: Comparing Interpolation Methods. The Professional Geographer, 59 (1): 87–104. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9272.2007.00593.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson M.E., Bresnahan P. (2004)—Accuracy of airborne lidarderivedelevation: empirical assessment and error budget. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70 (3): 331–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höfle B., Hollaus M. (2010)—Urban vegetation detection using high density full-waveform airborne lidar data—combination of object-based image and point cloud analysis. In Wagner W., Székely, B. (eds.): ISPRS TC VII Symposium—100 Years ISPRS, Vienna, Austria, July 5–7, 2010, IAPRS, Vol. XXXVIII, Part 7B, pp. 281–286.
   Google Scholar
• Jaboyedoff M., Oppikofer T., Abellan A., Derron M.H., Loye A., Metzger R., Pedrazzini A. (2010)—Use of LIDAR in landslides investigations: a review. Natural Hazards, 61 (1): 5–28. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9634-2.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston K., Ver Hoef J., Krivoruchko K., Neil L. (2001)—Using ArcGISTM Geostatistical Analyst. ESRITM, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kittler J., Devijver P.A. (1982)—Statistical Properties of Error Estimators in Performance Assessment of Recognition Systems. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 4 (2): 215–220. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1982.4767229.
   Google Scholar
• Korpela I., Ørka H.O., Maltamo M., Tokola T., Hyyppä J. (2010)—Tree species classification using airborne LiDAR—effects of stand and tree parameters, downsizing of training set, intensity normalization, and sensor type. Silva Fennica, 44 (2): 319–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar P., Foufoula-Georgiou E. (1997)—Wavelet analysis for geophysical applications. Reviews of Geophysics, 35 (4): 385–412. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/97RG00427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane S.N. (1998). The use of digital terrain modelling in the understanding of dynamic river systems. In: Lane, S.N., Richards, K.S., Chandler, J.H. (Eds.), Landform Monitoring, Modelling and Analysis. JohnWiley and Son Ltd., Chichester, UK., pp. 311–342.
   Google Scholar
• Lane S.N., Chandler J.H., Richards K.S. (1994)—Developments in monitoring and modelling small-scale river bed topography. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 19: 349–368. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290190406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lashermes B., Foufoula-Georgiou E., Dietrich W.E. (2007)—Channel network extraction from high resolution topography using wavelets. Geophysical Research Letters, L23S04, pp. 34. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031140.
   Google Scholar
• Liu H. (1999)—Development of an Antarctic digital elevation model: Columbus, Ohio. The Ohio State University, Byrd Polar Research Center, BPRC Report No. 19, pp.157.
   Google Scholar
• Liu X., Zhang Z., Peterson J., Chandra S. (2007). Lidar-derivedhigh quality ground control information and DEM for image orthorectification. GeoInformatica, 11 (1): 37–53. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10707-006-0005-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd C. D., Atkinson P. M., (2002a)—Deriving DSMs from LiDAR data with kriging. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23 (12): 2519–2524. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160110097998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd C.D., Atkinson P.M. (2002b)—Non-stationary approaches for mapping terrain and assessing prediction uncertainty. Transactions in GIS, 6 (1): 17–30. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9671.00092.
   Google Scholar
• Lohr U. (1998)—Digital elevation models by laser scanning. Photogrammetric Record, 16:105–109. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0031-868X.00117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucieer A., Stein A. (2005)—Texture-based landform segmentation of LiDAR imagery. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 6: 261–270. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2004.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggioni M., Freppaz M., Ceaglio E., Godone D., Viglietti D., Zanini E., Barbero M., Barpi F., Borri Brunetto M., Bovet E., Chiaia B., De Biagi V., Frigo B., Pallara O. (2013)—A new experimental snow avalanche test site at Seehore peak in Aosta Valley (NWItalian Alps)-part I: Conception and logistics. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 85: 175–182. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2012.09.006.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy J., Johnston K. (2002)—Using ArcGIS spatial analyst. Esri, Environmental Systems Research, Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelsen J., Schimel D.S., Friedl M.A., Davis F.W., Dubayah R.C. (1994)—Regression tree analysis of satellite and terrain data to guide vegetation sampling and surveys. Journal of Vegetation Science, 5: 673–686. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3235882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitas L., Mitasova H., Brown W.M. (1997)—Role of dynamic cartography in simulations of landscape processes based on multi-variate fields. Computers and Geosciences, 23: 437–446. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(97)00007-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitas L., Mitasova H. (1999)—Spatial Interpolation. In: Longley, P. Goodchild, M.F., Maguire, D. and Rhind, D. (eds.) Geographical Information Systems. 2nd Edition. Principles and Technical Issues, 1: 481–492.
   Google Scholar
• Moore I.D., Grayson R.B., Landson. A. R. (1991)—Digital Terrain Modelling: A Review of Hydrological, Geomorphological, and Biological Applications. Hydrological Processes, 5: 3–30. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360050103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olea R. A. (2006)—A six-step practical approach to semivariogram modeling. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 20 (5): 307–318. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00477-005-0026-1.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer N., Briese C., Mandlburger G., Höfle, B., Ressl C. (2009)—State of the art in high accuracy high detail DTM derived from ALS. EGU General Assembly 2009, held 19–24 April, 2009 in Vienna, Austria http://meetings.copernicus.org/egu2009,pp.4540.
   Google Scholar
• Pirotti F., Tarolli P. (2010)—Suitability of LiDAR point density and derived landform curvature maps for channel network extraction. Hydrological Processes, 24 (9): 1187–1197. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon J., Fraser C. S., Chunsun Z., Li Z., Gruen A. (2005)—Quality Assessment Of Digital Surface Models Generated From IKONOS Imagery. The Photogrammetric Record, 20: 162–171. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9730.2005.00312.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team - R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ripley B. (2011)—Tree: Classification and regression trees. R package version 1.0-29. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tree.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon C.E. (1948)—A mathematical theory of communications. Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma A., Tiwari K.N., Bhadoria P.B.S. (2011)—Determining the optimum cell size of digital elevation model for hydrologic application. Journal of Earth System Science, 120 (4): 573–582. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12040-011-0092-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibson R. (1981)—A Brief Description of Natural Neighbor Interpolation. Chapter 2 in Interpolating multivariate data, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1981, pp. 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Smith S.L., Holland D.A., Longley P.A. (2004)—The importance of understanding error in lidar digital elevation models. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 35: 996–1001.
   Google Scholar
• Su J.G., Bork E.W. (2006)—Influence of vegetation, slope and LIDAR sampling angle on DEM accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 72: 1265–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler W. R. (1970)—A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography, 46 (2): 234–240. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/143141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomeczak M. (2003)—Spatial Interpolation and its Uncertainity using Automated Anisotropic Inverse Distance Weghing (IDW)—Cross-validation/Jacknife Approach. In Mapping radioactivity in environment, Spatial Interpolation Comparison eds. G. Dubois, J. Malczewski, M. de Court, European Commission—Joint Research Centre, pp 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Toutin T. (2002)—Impact of terrain slope and aspect on radargrammetric DEM accuracy. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 57 (3): 228–249. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716(02)00123-5.
   Google Scholar
• Trevisani S., Cavalli M., Marchi L. (2009)—Variogram mapsfrom LiDAR data asfingerprints of surface morphology on scree slopes. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 9: 129–133. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/nhess-9-129-2009.
   Google Scholar
• Trevisani S., Cavalli M., Marchi L. (2012)—Surface texture analysis of a high-resolution DTM: Interpreting an alpine basin. Geomorphology, 161–162: 26–39. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.03.031.
   Google Scholar
• Urban D.L. (2002)—Classification and Regression Trees. In McCune B., Grace J. B., Analysis of Ecological Communities, MjM Software Design Gleneden Beach, Oregon USA, ISBN 0-9721290-0-6, pp. 222–232.
   Google Scholar
• Ventura G., Vilardo G., Terranova C., Bellucci Sessa E. (2011)—Tracking and evolution of complex active landslides by multi-temporal airborne LiDAR data: The Montaguto landslide (Southern Italy). Remote Sensing of Environment, 115 (12): 3237–3248. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.07.007.
   Google Scholar
• Watson D. (1992)—Contouring: A Guide to the Analysis and Display of Spatial Data. Pergamon Press, London, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Wehr A., Lohr U. (1999)—Airborne laser scanning-an introduction and overview. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54 (2–3): 68–82. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716(99)00011-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng Q. (2002)—Quantifying uncertainty of digital elevation models derived from topographic maps. Advances in spatial data handling, pp. 403–418.
   Google Scholar
• Wise S. (2011)—Assessing the spatial characteristics of DEM interpolation error through cross-validation. Computers & Geosciences, 37 (8): 978–991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise S. (2012)—Information entropy as a measure of DEM quality. Computers & Geosciences, 48: 102–110. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.05.011.
   Google Scholar
• Wong D.W., Yuan L., Perlin S.A. (2004)—Comparison of spatial interpolation methods for the estimation of air quality data. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology 14: 404–415. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock C.E., Strahler A.H. (1987)—The factor of scale in remote-sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 21: 311–332. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(87)90015-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeverbergen L. W., Thorne C. R. (1987)—Quantitative Analysis of Land Surface Topography. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 12: 47–56. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290120107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar