Contextual PolSAR image classification using fractal dimension and support vector machines

References

• Aghababaee H., Tzeng Y.C., Amini J. (2012)—Swarm intelligence and fractals in dualpol synthetic aperture radar image change detection. SPIE Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, vol. 6 (1): 063596. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.6.063596.
   Google Scholar
• Beaulieu J.M., Touzi R. (2004)—Segmentation of textured polarimetric SAR scenes by likelihood approximation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42 (10): 2063–2072. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.835302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betti A., Barni M., Mecocci A. (1997)—Using a wavelet-based fractal feature to improve texture discrimination on SAR images. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 1: 251–254. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.1997.647752.
   Google Scholar
• Cloude S.R., Pottier E. (1997)—An entropy based classification scheme for land applications of polarimetric SAR. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 35 (1): 68–78. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/36.551935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman J. (1976)—Some fundamental properties of speckle. Journal of Optical Society of America, 66 (11): 1145–1150. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.66.001145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goumehei E., Tolpekin V.A. (2011)—Contextual image classification with support vector machines. Proceeing of 1th International conference on sensor and models in photogrammetry and remote sensing (SMPR), Tehran, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson F.M., Lewis A.J. (1998)—Principles and Applications of Imaging Radar. Manual of Remote Sensing. Third Edition, Volume 2, ASPRS, John Wiley and Sons Inc., Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu C.W., Chang C.C., Lin C.J. (2003)—A practical guide to support vector classification. Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Taiwan University.
   Google Scholar
• Huang C., Davis L.S., Townshend J.R.G. (2002)—An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23 (4): 725–749. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160110040323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourgli A., Oukil Y., Hirche A., Ouarzeddine M. (2011)—Polarimetric SAR images segmentation incorporating texture features. IEEE 17th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP), pp 1–5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICDSP.2011.6004979.
   Google Scholar
• Liu M., Zhang H., Wang C. (2011)—Applying the log-cumulants of texture parameter to fully polarimetric SAR classification using Support Vector Machines Classifier. IEEE CIE International Conference on Radar, 1: 728–731. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CIE-Radar.2011.6159644.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes A., Touzi R., Nezry E. (1990)—Adaptive speckle filters and Scene heterogeneity. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 28 (6): 992–1000. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/36.62623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbrot B.B., Van Ness J.W. (1968)—Fractional Brownian motions, fractional noises and applications. SIAM Review, 10 (4): 422–437. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/1010093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcdonald M.K., Varadan V., Leung H. (2002)—Chaotic behavior and non-linear prediction of airborne radar sea clutter data. IEEE International conference of Radar, pp. 331–337. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/NRC.2002.999740.
   Google Scholar
• Melgani F., Bruzzone L. (2004)—Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42 (8): 1778–1790. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.831865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountrakis G., Jungho I., Ogole C. (2010)—Support vector machines in remote sensing: a review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66 (3): 247–259. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.11.001.
   Google Scholar
• Novianto S., Guimaraes L., Suzuki Y., Maeda J., Anh V.V. (1999)—Multi-windowed Approach to the optimum Estimation of the Local Fractal Dimension for Natural Image Segmentation. IEEE international conference on Image Processing, 3: 222–226. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.1999.817105.
   Google Scholar
• Pal M., Mathur P.M. (2005)—Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26 (5): 1007–1011. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160512331314083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pant T., Singh D., Srivastava T. (2010)—Advanced fractal approach for unsupervised classification of SAR images. Elsevier Advances in Space Research, 45: 1338–1349. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parra C., Iftekharuddin. K., Rendon D. (2003)—Wavelet Based Estimation of the Fractal Dimension in fBm Images. IEEE International conference on neural engineering, Capri Island, Italy, pp 533–536. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CNE.2003.1196881.
   Google Scholar
• Rodionova N.V. (2007)—A combined use of decomposition and texture for terrain classification of fully polarimetric SAR images. Workshop of POLinSAR, 22–26 January, ESAESRIN, Frascati, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Samadzadegan F., Ferdosi E. (2012)—Classification of Polarimetric SAR Images Based on Optimum SVMs Classifier Using Bees Algorithm. International Conference on Intelligent Computational Systems (ICICS), Dubai. UAE.
   Google Scholar
• Touzi R. (2007)—Target scattering decomposition in terms of Roll-Invariant target parameters. IEEE transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45 (1): 73–84. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.886176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tso B., Mathur P.M. (2009)—Classification methods for remotely sensed data. Second edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420090741.
   Google Scholar
• Tzeng Y.C, Chiu S.H., Chen K.S. (2007)—Change Detections from SAR Images for Damage Estimation Based on a Spatial Chaotic Model. IEEE International conference on Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 1926–1930. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2007.4423203.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zyl J.J. (1989)—Unsupervised classification of scattering mechanisms using radar polarimetry data. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 27 (1): 36–45. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/APSAR.2009.5374123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vapnik V. (1998)—Statistical learning theory. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wu D., Linders J. (1999)—A new texture approach to discrimination of forest clear cut, canopy, and burned area using airborne C-band SAR. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37 (1): 555–563. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/36.739113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu P., Qin A.K. (2012)—Unsupervised polarimetric SAR image segmentation and classification using region growing with edge penalty. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50 (4): 1302–1317. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2011.2164085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L., Zou B., Zhang J., Zhang Y. (2010)—Classification of polarimetric SAR image based on support vector machine using multiple-component scattering model and texture features. Eurasip Journal on Advaces in Signal processing. Hindawi.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou G., Cui Y., Chen Y., Yin J., Yang J., Su Y. (2010)—Pol-SAR images classification using texture features and the complex Wishart distribution. IEEE Radar Conference, pp. 491–494. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.2010.5494572.
   Google Scholar