Area Dependent Region Merging: A Novel, User-Customizable Method to Create Forest Stands and Strata

References

• Van Aardt J.A.N., Wynne R.H., Oderwald R.G. (2006)—Forest Volume and Biomass Estimation Using Small-Footprint Lidar-Distributional Parameters on a Per-Segment Basis. Forest Science, 52 (6): 636–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Addink E.A., Van Coillie F.M.B., De Jong S.M. (2012)—Introduction to the GEOBIA 2010 special issue: From pixels to geographic objects in remote sensing image analysis. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 15 (0): 1–6. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.20n.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Akay A., Oğuz H., Karas I., Aruga K. (2009)—Using LiDAR technology in forestry activities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 151 (1): 117–124. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-008-0254-1.
   Google Scholar
• Ali S.S., Dare P.M., Jones S.D. (2009)—A Comparison of Pixel-and Object-Level Data Fusion Using Lidar and High-Resolution Imagery for Enhanced Classification. In S. Jones & K. Reinke (Eds.), Innovations in Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography (Vol. 1, pp. 3–17). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• ArcMap 10.1 (2012) -Redlands, CA, USA: ESRI (Environmental Systems Resource Institute. Available at: http://www.esri.com/(last accessed 18/05/2013).
   Google Scholar
• Asner G.P., Hughes R.F., Mascaro J., Uowolo A.L., Knapp D.E., Jacobson J., Kennedy-Bowdoin T., Clark J.K. (2011)—High-resolution carbon mapping on the million-hectare Island of Hawaii. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 9: 434–439. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/100179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baatz M., Schäpe A. (2000)—Multiresolution Segmentation: an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation. In J. Strobl (Ed.), (pp. 12–23). Presented at the Angewandte Geographische Informationsverarbeitung XII. Beiträge zum AGIT-Symposium Salzburg 2000, Karlsruhe, Herbert Wichmann Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bell J.F., Dilworth J.R. (2007)—Log Scaling and Timber Cruising (2007 Edition). Corvallis, OR: Cascade Printing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Benz U.C., Hofmann P., Willhauck G., Lingenfelder I., Heynen M. (2004)—Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 58 (3–4): 239–258. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2003.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaschke T. (2010)—Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65 (1): 2–16. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borders B.E., Shiver B.D., Clutter M.L. (2005)—Timber Inventory of Large Acreages Using Stratified Two-Stage List Sampling. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 29 (3): 152–157.
   Google Scholar
• CAR (2007)—Forest Project Protocol, Version 2.1. California Climate Action Registry. Available at: http://www.climateactionreserve.org/ (last accessed 18/05/2013).
   Google Scholar
• Castilla G., Hay G.J., Ruiz-Gallardo J.R. (2008)—Size-constrained Region Merging (SCRM): An Automated Delineation Tool for Assisted Photointerpretation. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 74 (4): 409–419. doi: http://dx.doi.org/0099-1112/08/7404-0409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng H.D., Jiang X.H., Sun Y., Wang, J. (2001)—Color image segmentation: advances and prospects. Pattern Recognition, 34 (12): 2259–2281. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(00)00149-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congalton R.G. (1991)—A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37 (1): 35–46. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey V., Zhang Y., Zhong M. (2010)—A Review on Image Segmentation Techniques with Remote Sensing Perspective. In W. Wagner & B. Székely (Eds.), ISPRS TC VII Symposium—100 Years ISPRS, ISPRS Technical Commission VII Symposium (Vol. XXXVIII, Part 7A, pp. 31–42). Vienn: IAPRS. Available at: http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXVIII/part7/a/pdf/31_XXXVIII-part7A.pdf (last accessed 18/05/2013).
   Google Scholar
• Fisher R.A., Yates F. (1948)—Statistical tables for biological, agricultural and medical research. (3rd ed.). London: Oliver & Boyd.
   Google Scholar
• Fu K.S., Mui J.K. (1981)—A survey on image segmentation. Pattern Recognition, 13 (1): 3–16. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203(81)90028-5.
   Google Scholar
• GDAL Development Team (2012)—GDAL—Geospatial Data Abstraction Library. Open Source Geospatial Foundation. Available at: http://gdal.osgeo.org (last accessed 18/05/2013).
   Google Scholar
• Golinkoff J., Hanus M., Carah J. (2011)—The use of airborne laser scanning to develop a pixel-based stratification for a verified carbon offset project. Carbon Balance and Management, 6 (1): 9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-6-9.
   Google Scholar
• Golinkoff J.S., Running S.W. (2013)—A system to integrate multi-scaled data sources for improving terrestrial carbon balance estimates. In Brown D.G., Robinson D.T., French N.H.F., Reed B.C. (Eds.), Land Use and the Carbon Cycle: Advances in Integrated Science, Management, and Policy (pp. 259–287). New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://www.cambridge.org/us/knowledge/isbn/item6962587/?site_locale=en_US (last accessed 18/05/2013).
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez R.C., Woods R.E., Eddins S.L. (2009)—Digital Image Processing Using MATLAB (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez P., Asner G.P., Battles J.J., Lefsky M.A., Waring K.M., Palace M. (2010)—Forest carbon densities and uncertainties from Lidar, Quick Bird, and field measurements in California. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114 (7): 1561–1575. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall R.J., Skakun R.S., Arsenault E.J., Case B.S. (2006)—Modeling forest stand structure attributes using Landsat ETM+ data: Application to mapping of aboveground biomass and stand volume. Forest Ecology and Management, 225 (1–3): 378–390. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J. (2009)—The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction (2nd ed.). Springer. Available at: http://www-stat.stanford.edu/∼hastie/Papers/ESLII.pdf (last accessed 18/05/2013).
   Google Scholar
• Hay G.J., Castilla G., Wulder M.A., Ruiz J.R. (2005)—An automated object-based approach for the multiscale image segmentation of forest scenes. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 7 (4): 339–359. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2005.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay G.J., Castilla G. (2008)—Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA): A new name for a new discipline. In T. Blaschke, S. Lang, & G. J. Hay (Eds.), Object-Based Image Analysis, Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography (pp. 75–89). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Available at: http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-540-77058-9_4 (last accessed 18/05/2013).
   Google Scholar
• Haywood A., Stone C. (2011)—Semi-automating the stand delineation process in mapping natural eucalypt forests. Australian Forestry, 74 (1): 13–22. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2011.10676341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinsch F.A., Zhao M., Running S.W., Kimball J.S., Nemani R.R., Davis K.J., Bolstad P.V., Cook B.D., Desai A.R., Ricciuto D.M., Law B.E., Oechel W.C., Kwon H., Luo H., Wofsy S.C., Dunn A.L., Munger J.W., Baldocchi D.D., Xu L., Hollinger D.Y., Richardson A.D., Stoy P.C., Siqueira M.B.S., Monson R.K., Burns S.P., Flanagan L. B. (2006)—Evaluation of Remote Sensing Based Terrestrial Productivity from MODIS Using Regional Eddy Flux Network Observations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44 (7): 1908–1925. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2005.853936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann P., Blaschke T., Strobl J. (2011)—Quantifying the robustness of fuzzy rule sets in object-based image analysis. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 32 (22): 7359–7381. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.523727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioki K., Imanishi J., Sasaki T., Morimoto Y., Kitada K. (2009)—Estimating stand volume in broad-leaved forest using discrete-return LiDAR: plot-based approach. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 6 (1), 29–36. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11355-009-0077-4.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins J.C., Chojnacky D.C., Heath L.S., Birdsey R.A. (2004)—Comprehensive Database of Diameter-based Biomass Regressions for North American Tree Species. (F. S. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ed.). Northeastern Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen K., Bartolo R., Phinn S. (2010)—SPECIAL FEATURE—Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis. Journal of Spatial Science, 55 (1): 3–7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2010.494653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke Y., Quackenbush L.J., Im J. (2010)—Synergistic use of Quick Bird multispectral imagery and LIDAR data for object-based forest species classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114 (6): 1141–1154. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latifi H., Nothdurft A., Koch B. (2010)—Non-parametric prediction and mapping of standing timber volume and biomass in a temperate forest: application of multiple optical/LiDAR-derived predictors. Forestry, 83 (4): 395–407. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpq022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leckie D.G., Gougeon F.A., Walsworth N., Paradine D. (2003)—Stand delineation and composition estimation using semi-automated individual tree crown analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment, 85 (3): 355–369. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00013-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardia K.V., Kent J.T., Bibby J.M. (1979)—Multivariate analysis. Probability and mathematical statistics. London; New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marpu P.R., Neubert M., Herold H., Niemeyer I. (2010)—Enhanced evaluation of image segmentation results. Journal of Spatial Science, 55 (1): 55–68. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2010.487850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maselli F., Chiesi M., Moriondo M., Fibbi L., Bindi M., Running S. W. (2009)—Modelling the forest carbon budget of a Mediterranean region through the integration of ground and satellite data. Ecological Modelling, 220 (3): 330–342. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.10.002.
   Google Scholar
• MATLAB (2011)—Image Processing Toolbox. Natick, Massachusetts, U.S.A: Mathworks. Available at: http://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab/?s_cid=global_nav (last accessed 18/05/2013).
   Google Scholar
• Mildrexler D.J., Zhao M., Running S.W. (2009)—Testing a MODIS Global Disturbance Index across North America. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113 (10): 2103–2117. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan G.W., Cooper M.C. (1988)—A study of standardization of variables in cluster analysis. Journal of Classification, 5 (2): 181–204. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01897163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller M., Lymburner L., Volk M. (2007)—The comparison index: A tool for assessing the accuracy of image segmentation. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 9 (3): 311–321. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2006.10.002.
   Google Scholar
• Næsset E. (2002)—Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80 (1): 88–99. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00290-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M. (1996)—Estimation of tree heights and stand volume using an airborne lidar system. Remote Sensing of Environment, 56 (1): 1–7. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(95)00224-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Openshaw S. (1984)—The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem. CATMOG—Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography, 38: 1–41.
   Google Scholar
• Pal N.R., Pal S.K. (1993)—A review on image segmentation techniques. Pattern Recognition, 26 (9): 1277–1294. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203(93)90135-J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual C., García-Abril A., García-Montero L.G., Martín-Fernández S., Cohen W.B. (2008)—Object-based semi-automatic approach for forest structure characterization using lidar data in heterogeneous Pinus sylvestris stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 255 (11): 3677–3685. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.02.055.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu S.C., Wynne R.H., Nelson R.F. (2003)—Measuring individual tree crown diameter with lidar and assessing its influence on estimating forest volume and biomass. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 29 (5): 564–577. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5589/m03-027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter C., Klooster S., Huete A., Genovese V. (2007a)—Terrestrial carbon sinks for the United States predicted from MODIS satellite data and ecosystem modeling. Earth Interactions, 11 (13): 1–21. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/EI228.1.
   Google Scholar
• Potter C., Gross P., Genovese V., Smith M.-L. (2007b)—Net primary productivity of forest stands in New Hampshire estimated from Landsat and MODIS satellite data. Carbon Balance and Management, 2 (9). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1750-0680-2-9.
   Google Scholar
• Riggins J., Tullis J., Stephen F. (2009)—Per-segment Aboveground Forest Biomass Estimation Using LIDAR-Derived Height Percentile Statistics. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 46 (2): 232–248. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2747/1548-1603.46.2.232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Running S.W., Nemani R.R., Heinsch F.A., Zhao M., Reeves M.C., Hashimoto H. (2004)—A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. BioScience, 54 (6): 547–560. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0547:ACSMOG]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki T., Imanishi J., Ioki K., Morimoto Y., Kitada K. (2012)—Object-based classification of land cover and tree species by integrating airborne LiDAR and high spatial resolution imagery data. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 8 (2): 157–171. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11355-011-0158-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiver B.D., Borders B.E. (1996)—Sampling techniques for forest resource inventory. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Song C., Dickinson M.B., Su L., Zhang S., Yaussey D. (2010)—Estimating average tree crown size using spatial information from Ikonos and Quick Bird images: Across-sensor and across-site comparisons. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114 (5): 1099–1107. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.12.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan A.A., McGaughey R.J., Andersen H.E., Schiess P. (2009)—Object-Oriented Classification of Forest Structure from Light Detection and Ranging Data for Stand Mapping. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 24 (4): 198–204.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson S.K. (2002)—Sampling. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Turner M.G., Gardner R.H., O'Neil R.V. (2001)—Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. New York, NY, Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Z., Jensen J.R., Im J. (2010)—An automatic region-based image segmentation algorithm for remote sensing applications. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25 (10): 1149–1165. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock C.E., Strahler A.H., Jupp D.L.B. (1988)—The use of variograms in remote sensing: II. Real digital images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 25 (3): 349–379. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(88)90109-5.
   Google Scholar
• Wulder M.A., Seemann D. (2003)—Forest inventory height update through the integration of lidar data with segmented Landsat imagery. Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 29 (5): 536–543. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5589/m03-032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulder M.A., White J.C., Nelson R.F., Næsset E., Ørka H.O., Coops N.C., Hilker T., Bater C.W., Gobakken T. (2012)—Lidar sampling for large-area forest characterization: A review. Remote Sensing of Environment, 121 (0): 196–209. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X., Kondragunta S. (2006)—Estimating forest biomass in the USA using generalized allometric models and MODIS land products. Geophysical Research Letters, 33: 1–5. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL025879.
   Google Scholar