Monitoring land use changes associated with urbanization: An object based image analysis approach

References

• Aplin P., Smith G. M. (2011)—Introduction to object-based landscape analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25 (6): 869–875. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2011.566570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydinoglu A. C., Gungor O. (2010)—A Novel Land Cover/Use Data Model for GIS and Remote Sensing Applications in Turkey. Italian Journal of Remote Sensing, 42 (2): 2741. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5721/ItJRS20104223.
   Google Scholar
• Ceccarelli T., Smiraglia D., Bajocco S., Rinaldo S., Angelis A.D., Salvati L., Perini L. (2014)—Land cover data from Landsat single-date imagery: an approach integrating pixel-based and object-based classifiers. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 46: 699–717. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5721/EuJRS20134641.
   Google Scholar
• Chan J. C. W., Kwok-Plng C., Yeh A.G. (2001)—Detecting the nature of change in an urban environment: A comparison of machine learning algorithms. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67 (2): 213–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapin F. S., Zavaleta E. S., Eviner V. T., Naylor R. L., Vitousek P.M., Reynolds H.L., Hooper D. U., Lavorel S., Sala, O. E., Hobbie S.E., Mack M. C., Diaz S. (2000). Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature, 405 (6783): 234–242. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35012241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X., Vierling L., Deering D. (2005)—A simple and effective radiometric correction method to improve landscape change detection across sensors and across time. Remote Sensing of Environment, 98: 63–79. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.05.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppin P., Jonckheere I., Nackaerts K., Muys B., Lambin E. (2004)—Review Article: Digital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25 (9): 1565–1596. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0143116031000101675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng J. S., Wang K., Hong Y., Qi J. G. (2009)—Spatio-temporal dynamics and evolution of land use change and landscape pattern in response to rapid urbanization. Landscape and Urban Planning, 92 (34): 187–198. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.05.001.
   Google Scholar
• DES (2010)—District socio economic review-2012, Pune district. Directorate of Economics and statistics, Govt. of Maharashtra, Mumbai, India.
   Google Scholar
• Donnay J.P., Barnsley M. J., Longley P. A. (2001)—Remote Sensing and Urban Analysis. Taylor and Francis, London and New York. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203306062.
   Google Scholar
• Du Y., Teillet P.M., Cihlar J. (2002)—Radiometric normalization of multi-temporal high-resolution satellite images with quality control for land cover change detection. Remote Sensing of Environment, 82: 123–134. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00029-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fichera R. C., Modica G., Pollino M. (2012)—Land Cover classification and change-detection analysis using multi-temporal remote sensed imagery and landscape metrics. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 45: 1–18. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5721/EuJRS20124501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley J. A., DeFries R., Asner G. P., Barford C., Bonan G., Carpenter S.R., Chapin F. S., Coe M. T., Daily G. C., Gibbs H. K., Helkowski J. H., Holloway T., Howard E. A., Kucharik C. J., Monfreda C., Patz J. A., Prentice I. C., Ramankutty N., Snyder P. K. (2005)—Global Consequences of Land Use. Science, 309 (5): 570–574. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772.
   Google Scholar
• Foody G. M. (2002)—Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80 (1): 185–201. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034257(01)00295-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green K., Kempka D., Lackey L. (1994)—Using remote sensing to detect and monitor land-cover and land-use change. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 60 (3): 331–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen M. C., Loveland T. R. (2012)—A review of large area monitoring of land cover change using Landsat data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 122: 66–74. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herold M., Couclelis H., Clarke K. C. (2005)—The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modeling of urban land use change. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29 (4): 369–399. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2003.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen J. R. (2005)—Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective (third edition). Pearson Prentice Hall Series in Geographic Information Science. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, pp. 373–374.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen J. R., Cowen D.C. (1999)—Remote sensing of urban/suburban infrastructure and socioeconomic attributes. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 65 (5): 611–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam T. S. (1995)—Integrating GIS and remote sensing techniques for urban landcover and landuse analysis. Geocarto International, 10 (1): 39–49. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106049509354477.
   Google Scholar
• Loveland T. R., Sohl T. L., Stehman S. V., Gallant A. L., Sayler K. L., Napton D. E. (2002)—A Strategy for Estimating the Rates of Recent United States Land Cover Changes. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 68 (10): 1091–1099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRSC (2005)—Wastelands Atlas of India. National Remote Sensing Centre, ISRO (DOS) Govt. of India, Hyderabad, India.
   Google Scholar
• NRSC (2011)—Wastelands Atlas of India 2011 (Change analysis based on temporal satellite data of 2005–06 and 2008–09. National Remote Sensing Centre, ISRO (DOS) Govt. of India, Hyderabad, India.
   Google Scholar
• Pilloni M. (2011)—Analysis and validation of a methodology to evaluate land cover in the Mediterranean basin using multi temporal MODIS data Georgia metropolitan area. Italian Journal of Remote Sensing, 43 (1): 19–31. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5721/ItJRS20114312.
   Google Scholar
• Ridd M. K., Liu J. (1998)—A comparison of four algorithms for change detection in an urban environment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 63 (2): 95–100. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00112-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogan J., Chen D. (2004)—Remote sensing technology for mapping and monitoring landcover and land-use change. Progress in Planning, 61 (4): 301–325. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-9006(03)00066-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samal D. R., Gedam S. S., Nagarajan R. (2015)—GIS based drainage morphometry and its influence on hydrology in parts of Western Ghats region, Maharashtra, India. Geocarto International. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2014.978903.
   Google Scholar
• Samal D. R., Gedam S. S. (2013)—Assessing the impact of land use change on stream flow in a semi-urban river basin, Maharashtra, India. International Journal of Hydrology Science and Technology, 3 (4): 351–363. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHST.2013.060336.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider A. (2012)—Monitoring land cover change in urban and peri-urban areas using dense time stacks of Landsat satellite data and a data mining approach. Remote Sensing of Environment, 124: 689–704. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder T. A., Cohen W. B., Song C., Canty M. J., Yang Z. (2006)—Radiometric correction of multi-temporal Landsat data for characterization of early successional forest patterns in western Oregon. Remote Sensing of Environment, 103: 16–26. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seto K. C., Liu W. (2003)—Comparing ARTMAP neural network with the maximum likelihood classifier for detecting urban change. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69 (9): 981–990. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14358/PERS.69.9.981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A. (1989)—Review Article Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10 (6): 989–1003. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431168908903939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohl T. L. (1999)—Change analysis in the United Arab Emirates: an investigation of techniques. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 65 (4): 475–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song C., Woodcock C. E., Seto K. C., Lenney M. P., Macomber S.A. (2001)—Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: When and how to correct atmospheric effects? Remote Sensing of Environment, 75: 230–244. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00169-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui D. Z., Zeng H. (2001)—Modeling the dynamics of landscape structure in Asia's emerging desakota regions: a case study in Shenzhen. Landscape and Urban Planning, 53 (1–4): 37–52. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00136-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teillet P.M., Fedosejevs G., Thome K. J., Barker J. L. (2007)—Impacts of spectral band difference effects on radiometric cross-calibration between satellite sensors in the solar-reflective spectral domain. Remote Sensing of Environment, 110: 393–409. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teillet P. M., Staenz K., William D. J. (1997)—Effects of spectral, spatial, and radiometric characteristics on remote sensing vegetation indices of forested regions. Remote Sensing of Environment, 61: 139–149. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock C. E., Allen R., Anderson M., Belward A., Bindschadler R., Cohen W., Gao F., Goward N., Helder D., Helmer E., Nemani R., Oreopoulos L., Schott J., Thenkabail P.S., Vermote E.F., Vogelmann J., Wulder M.A., Wynne R. (2008)—Free access to Landsat imagery. Science, 320: 1011. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.07.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X., Lo C. P. (2002)—Using a time series of satellite imagery to detect land use and land cover changes in the Atlanta, Georgia metropolitan area. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23 (9): 1775–1798. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01431160110075802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L., Xian G., Klaver J. M., Deal B. (2003)—Urban land-cover change detection through subpixel imperviousness mapping using remotely sensed data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69 (9): 1003–1010. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14358/PERS.69.9.1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar