Applicability of Artificial Neural Network in Hydraulic Experiments Using a New Sewer Overflow Screening Device

References

• American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2000a, “Artificial neural networks in hydrology. I: preliminary concepts”, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 115–123.
   Google Scholar
• American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2000b, “Artificial neural networks in hydrology. II: hydrologic applications”, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 124–137.
   Google Scholar
• Aziz, M. A., Imteaz, M. A., Choudhury, T. A. & Phillips, D. I. 2011, “Artificial Neural Networks for the prediction of the trapping efficiency of a new sewer overflow screening device”, 19 th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bruen, M. & Yang, J. 2006, “Combined hydraulic and black-box models for flood forecasting in urban drainage systems”, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 6, November.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, W. C. & Barthelemy, J. 1994, “Common misconcepts about neural networks as approximators”, J. Comp. in Civ. Engrg., ASCE, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 345–358.
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, Y. M., Chang, L.-C., Tsai, M. J., Wang, Y. F. & Chang, F. J. 2010, “Dynamic neural networks for real-time water level predictions of sewerage systems-covering gauged and ungauged sites”, Journal of Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, Vol. 14, pp. 1309–1319.
   Google Scholar
• Fausett, L. 1994, Fundamentals of neural networks, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
   Google Scholar
• Guanghua, Q. & Wang, S. 2011, “Annual runoff prediction with a sensitive artificial neural networks model”, 34 th IAHR World Congress - Balance and Uncertanity, 33 th Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, 10 th Hydraulics Conference, 26 June to 1 July, Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Hagan, M. T. & Mehnaj, M. B. 1994, “Training Feedforward Networks with the Marquardt Algorithm”, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 5 , pp. 989–993.
   Google Scholar
• Haykin, S. 1994, Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation, MacMillan, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Imrie, C. E. & Durucan, S. 1999, “River flow prediction using the cascade-correlation neural network learning architecture”, Water 99 Joint Congress, Brisbane, Australia, 6-8 July.
   Google Scholar
• Luk, K. C., Ball, J. E. & Sharma, A. 1999, “Integration of Artificial neural networks and geographical information systems for rainfall forecasting”, Water 99 Joint Congress, Brisbane, Australia, 6-8 July.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, H. R. & Dandy, G. C. 1996, “The use of artificial neural networks for the prediction of water quality parameters”, Journal of Water Resources Research, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp. 1013–1022.
   Google Scholar
• Maier, H. R. & Dandy, G. C., 2001, “Neural network based modelling of environmental variables: asystematic approach”, Journal of Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 33, pp. 669–682.
   Google Scholar
• Maren, A., Harston, C. & Pap, R. 1990, Handbook of neural computing applications, academic, San Diego, Cardiff, 448 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., 1991, Wastewater engineering, treatment, disposal and reuse, 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill, Inc., Boston, MA, pp. 448–451.
   Google Scholar
• Moffa, P. E. 1997, “Scarborough CSO project-review of CSO screen application”, report prepared for the City of Scarborough, Municipality of Metro, Toronto, ON.
   Google Scholar
• Pannell, J. C., Daniell, T. M. & Walker, D. J. 1996, “Rainfall Based Real-Time flood forecasting using Artificial neural networks”, 23 rd Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, Hobart, Australia, 21-24 May.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. I. & Simon, M. 2010, “An improved method of screening sewer solids during CSO events”, Proc. of the 7 th Int. Novatech Conf. On Urban Drainage, Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Raduly, B., Genaey, K. V., Capodaglio, A., Mikkelsen, P. & Henze, M. 2007, “Artificial neural networks for rapid WWTP performance evaluation: methodology and case study”, Journal of Environmental Modelling and Software, Vol. 22, No. 8, pp. 1208–1216.
   Google Scholar
• Riedmiller, M. & Braun, H. 1993, “A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: the RPROP algorithm”, IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, Vol. 581, pp. 586–591.
   Google Scholar
• Salim, L. 2012, “Wavelet transform, neural networks and the prediction of s&p price index: a comparative study of back propagation numerical algorithms”, Journal of Business Intelligence, Vol. 5, No. 2, July.
   Google Scholar
• Sarle, W. S. 1995, “Stopped Training and Other Remedies for Overfitting”, Proceedings of the 27 th Symposium on the Interface of Computing Science and Statistics, pp. 352–360.
   Google Scholar
• SAS, 1999, SAS OnlineDoc, version 8, http://v8doc. sas.com/sas.html, accessed 29 April 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, M. & Phillips, D. I. 2008, “The development of a sewer solids screening system for CSO chambers”, Proc. of the 11 th Int. Conf. on Urban Drainage, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
   Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2009, Environmental Impact and Benefits Assessment for Final Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Construction and Development Category, November.
   Google Scholar
• Weyand, M. 2002, “Real-time control in combined sewer systems in Germany-some case studies”, Journal of Urban Water, Vol. 4, pp. 347–354.
   Google Scholar
• Willems, P. & Berlamont, J. 1999, “Probabilistic modelling of sewer system overflow emissions”, Water Sci. Tech., Vol. 39, No. 9, pp. 47–54.
   Google Scholar