Supplemental material
Acta Oncologica
Volume 59, 2020 - Issue 3
Open access
1,923
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLES: MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
Terminal digit preference: a source of measurement error in breast cancer diameter reporting
Kaitlyn M. TsurudaCancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; ;Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway;
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8749-6237View further author information
Solveig HofvindCancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; ;Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Life Sciences and Health, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway;
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0178-8939View further author information
Lars A. AkslenCentre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; ;Department of Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway;
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2710-9543View further author information
Solveig R. HoffDepartment of Radiology, Aalesund Hospital, Aalesund, Norway; ;Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway;
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7928-3821View further author information
Marit B. VeierødOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, University of Oslo, Oslo, NorwayCorrespondence[email protected]
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2083-2758View further author information
Pages 260-267
|
Received 19 Jun 2019, Accepted 14 Sep 2019, Published online: 30 Sep 2019
Related Research Data
Melanoma staging: Varying precision and terminal digit clustering in Breslow thickness data is evident in a population-based study
Source:
Elsevier BV
A novel approach to T classification in tumor-node-metastasis staging of breast cancer
Source:
Elsevier BV
Terminal digit preference: a source of measurement error in breast cancer diameter reporting
Source:
Taylor & Francis
Modeling the Effect of Tumor Size in Early Breast Cancer
Source:
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: An overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness
Source:
Elsevier BV
Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.
Source:
Elsevier BV
Assessment of Breast Cancer Tumor Size Depends on Method, Histopathology and Tumor Size Itself*
Source:
Springer Nature
The use of mammographic tumour feature significantly improves outcome prediction of breast cancers smaller than 15 mm: a reproducibility study from two comprehensive breast centres
Source:
Springer Nature
The impact of breast cancer biological subtyping on tumor size assessment by ultrasound and mammography - a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 6543 primary breast cancer patients
Source:
Springer Nature
Terminal digit preference: a source of measurement error in breast cancer diameter reporting
Source:
Taylor & Francis
Essential TNM: a registry tool to reduce gaps in cancer staging information
Source:
Elsevier BV
Stage-specific incidence and survival of breast cancer in Norway: The implications of changes in coding and classification practice
Source:
Elsevier BV
Systematic review of agreement between tomosynthesis and pathologic tumor size for newly diagnosed breast cancer and comparison with other imaging tests
Source:
Informa UK Limited
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research
Source:
Elsevier BV
Validity of Norwegian Rectal Cancer Registry data at a major university hospital 1997–2005
Source:
Informa UK Limited
Correlating sonography, mammography, and pathology in the assessment of breast cancer size
Source:
Elsevier BV
Related research
People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.
Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.