Is there a reduction in risk of revision when 36-mm heads instead of 32 mm are used in total hip arthroplasty for patients with proximal femur fractures?

A matched analysis of 5,030 patients with a median of 2.5 years’ follow-up between 2006 and 2016 in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association

Georgios TsikandylakisDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; ;The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden; ;Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Dept of Orthopaedics, Gothenburg, Sweden; Correspondence[email protected]

Johan N KärrholmDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; ;The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden; ;Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Dept of Orthopaedics, Gothenburg, Sweden;

Geir HallanThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway; ;Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway;

Ove FurnesThe Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway; ;Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Norway;

Antti EskelinenCoxa Hospital of Joint Replacement, Tampere Finland; ;The Finnish Arthroplasty Register, Finland;

Keijo MäkeläThe Finnish Arthroplasty Register, Finland; ;Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Turku University Hospital, Finland;

Alma B PedersenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; ;The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Denmark;

Søren OvergaardThe Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Denmark; ;Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; ;Institute of Clinical Research, University of SouthernDenmark

Maziar MohaddesDepartment of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg; ;The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden; ;Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Dept of Orthopaedics, Gothenburg, Sweden;

show all

Is there a reduction in risk of revision when 36-mm heads instead of 32 mm are used in total hip arthroplasty for patients with proximal femur fractures?

A matched analysis of 5,030 patients with a median of 2.5 years’ follow-up between 2006 and 2016 in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association

Supplemental Material

Related Research Data

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Is there a reduction in risk of revision when 36-mm heads instead of 32 mm are used in total hip arthroplasty for patients with proximal femur fractures?

A matched analysis of 5,030 patients with a median of 2.5 years’ follow-up between 2006 and 2016 in the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association

Supplemental Material

Related Research Data

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date