ABSTRACT
Aims
To explore the global trends in blended learning in undergraduate dental education during the COVID pandemic and during the recovery phase by engaging with the students and faculty and evaluate the implications for dental education in the post-COVID era.
Methods
It was a pilot cross-sectional study which employed a convenience sampling technique to recruit representatives of dental faculty and undergraduate students in 80 dental institutions globally. A previously validated questionnaire consisting of a combination of closed and open-ended items was used for data collection. Responses to these online questionnaires were processed and analysed using the R statistical computing environment.
Results
A total of 320 dental students and 169 faculty members from 47 different dental institutions participated in the study. Video and Live Online Tutorials were considered to be the most effective method of online learning followed by online question banks by both groups. Significant differences were noted between faculty and students regarding time spent and effectiveness of online teaching and learning, respectively, both before and after the start of COVID. The results highlight the faculty need to engage more closely with the students to address their learning needs. Finally, the participants provided several recommendations regarding the future development of teaching and learning strategies as well as assessments in the post-pandemic era.
Conclusions
This is the first study which explores blended learning in dental education with participants from multiple institutions in different regions of the globe. Compared to the faculty, students considered online learning to be less interactive and preferred learning activities and all assessments to be delivered face-to-face. The results underscore the need to adapt teaching practices to suit the learning needs of the students.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all faculty and students who participated in this study.
Authors’ contributions
KA conceptualized the study and drafted the manuscript
DZ analysed the data
MR contributed to drafting the introduction
BK contributed to data collection
EA contributed to data collection and drafting the manuscript
ZB contributed to data collection and drafting the manuscript
EM contributed to data collection and drafting the manuscript
SZ contributed to ethics approval and editing the manuscript
AW, RF, TH, SD, & HD contributed to data collection
All authors reviewed the manuscript
Availability of data and materials
Detailed survey data are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board Qatar University (Reference number: QU-IRB 1614-E/21) and the Research Ethics and Integrity Committee, The University of Queensland, Australia (Approval No. 2021/HE002445).
Supplemental data
Supplemental data for this article can be accessed online at https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2171700