11,931
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Focus on Airway

Evidence-Based Guideline for Prehospital Airway Management

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 545-557 | Received 11 Apr 2023, Accepted 05 Nov 2023, Published online: 22 Dec 2023
 

Abstract

Airway management is a cornerstone of emergency medical care. This project aimed to create evidence-based guidelines based on the systematic review recently conducted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). A technical expert panel was assembled to review the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The panel made specific recommendations on the different PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) questions reviewed in the AHRQ review and created good practice statements that summarize and operationalize these recommendations. The recommendations address the use of ventilation with bag-valve mask ventilation alone vs. supraglottic airways vs. endotracheal intubation for adults and children with cardiac arrest, medical emergencies, and trauma. Additional recommendations address the use of video laryngoscopy and drug-assisted airway management. These recommendations, and the associated good practice statements, offer EMS agencies and clinicians an opportunity to review the available evidence and incorporate it into their airway management strategies.

This article is referred to by:
Prehospital Airway Management – the Continued Search for Evidence
This article is related to:
Evidence-Based Guidelines for Prehospital Airway Management: Methods and Resources Document

Author Contributions

JLJ, JMS, ARP, CBG, and ESL directed the design of the project, discussion of the data, grading of the evidence, and development of the recommendations. JLJ, JWL, ARP, NB, JDO, DBB, LMM, RPC, and JMS drafted the manuscript. All authors/Technical Expert Panel members contributed substantially to the discussion and development of the recommendations and contributed to the manuscript. JLJ takes responsibility for the manuscript as a whole.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).