Abstract
This study aimed to contribute to knowledge about research on educational superintendents as decision-maker through a systematic review of research on this topic undertaken between 2000 and 2022. A literature search followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) approach. Of the 313 articles identified, 36 met the inclusion and quality criteria of the mixed-methods appraisal tool (MMAT) 2018. Six main areas emerged in research on superintendents’ decision-making tasks: policy implementation (n = 9), contextual issues (n = 7), general decision-making processes (n = 7), decision-making competence (n = 5), gender (n = 4), and values/ethics (n = 4). Results showed that most articles (28) were about research in the US. The review identified a lack of research about superintendents’ tasks as decision-makers, such as 1. knowledge about the significant differences between superintendents’ roles as decision-makers in urban and rural areas, 2. professional development programs for superintendents’ as decision-makers, and 3. studies about gender issues as the majority of teachers were women, while the majority of superintendents as decision-makers are men.
REVIEWING EDITOR:
Acknowledgments
We thank Geoff Whyte, MBA, and Melissa Leffler, MBA, from Edanz (https://www.edanz.com/ac), for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Disclosure statement
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Mona Holmqvist
Dr Mona Holmqvist (PhD) is professor of Educational Sciemces at Lund University. Her research interests include teaching and learning in differnt educational settings from preschool to higher education, and educational policy.
Martin Lantz Ekström
Martin Lantz Ekström is a doctoral student in Education at Malmö University. His research interest is educational management, with a specific focus on educational superintendents.