Abstract
Purpose
Glimepiride, an FDA-approved oral hypoglycemic drug, is a long-acting sulfonylurea (SU), used for treating type 2 diabetes. The study aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence and safety profiles of two different formulations of glimepiride 1 mg from two different manufactures in healthy Chinese subjects in the fasting and fed state in order to acquire adequate pharmacokinetic evidence for registration approval of the test formulation.
Patients and Methods
This study is an open-label, two-period, two-sequence, randomized, two-way crossover pharmacokinetic study in healthy Chinese subjects in the fasting and fed state. Seventy-two subjects were randomly assigned to the fasting group and the fed group (n=36 each). We collected blood samples, 24-h post drug administration. The plasma concentration of glimepiride was assessed using HPLC coupled with mass spectrometry. The following parameters were evaluated: AUC0-inf, AUC0-last, Cmax, t1⁄2, Tmax, and λz. Safety was determined based on the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and laboratory examinations (biochemistry, hematology, and urinalysis) throughout the entire study period.
Results
The geometric mean ratios (GMR) amongst the two glimepiride formulations for the primary pharmacokinetic parameters, ie, AUC0-inf, AUC0-last, and Cmax as well as the corresponding 90% CIs, were all within the range of 80.00–125.00% in the fasting and fed state. The safety profile for both treatments was comparable.
Conclusion
PK analysis revealed that the test and reference formulations of glimepiride were bioequivalent and well tolerated in healthy Chinese subjects. Chinese Clinical Trials Registry identifier: CTR20171121.
Clinical Trial Registration Number
CTR20171121.
Acknowledgments
We thank all of the healthy subjects for their participation in this study and the sponsor, Shandong Xinhua Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd for their financial support.
Data Sharing Statement
All available data is displayed in the article. No study protocol, statistical analysis plan and other information would be provided.
Ethics Approval and Informed Consent
This study was approved by the Drug Clinical Trial Ethics Committee of the Lanzhou University Second Hospital and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by an ethics committee. All subjects provided written informed consent.
Disclosure
Youwei Xu and Zhonghui Zheng are employees of Shandong Xinhua Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Shilin Chen is an employee of Chengdu Fanweixi Pharmaceutical Technology Company, Limited. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.