Abstract
Introduction
Spinal cord injury (SCI) often causes muscle spasticity, which can be inhibited by using calcium channel blocker. Botulinum toxin type A (BoT-A) shows therapeutic efficacy on spasticity and may exert inhibitory effects on the calcium channel.
Methods
A rat model with muscle spasticity was established after SCI via contusion and compression. Different concentrations (0, 1, 3 and 6 U/kg) of BoT-A Botox were injected in the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscles of the right hindlimb in the muscle spasticity model. The changes of muscle spasticity and calcium level in EDL muscles were measured after the establishment of SCI-induced spasticity. Cav3.2 calcium channel subunit and its mutant (M1560V) were analyzed using Western blot before (input) or after immunoprecipitation with anti-FLAG antibody, and their currents were measured in motoneurons by using whole-cell voltage clamp recordings.
Results
SCI induced muscle spasticity, whereas calcium level in EDL muscles and expression of Cav3.2 was increased in the SCI model when compared with the sham group (p < 0.05). BoT-A Botox treatment significantly reduced muscle spasticity and calcium level in EDL muscles and Cav3.2 expression in a dose-dependent way (p < 0.05). The ratio of biotinylated to total Cav3.2 was reduced in the mutant (M1560V) of Cav3.2 and lower than that in the wild Cav3.2. BoT-A Botox intervention also reduced the current values of calcium channel and the ratio in a dose-dependent way (p < 0.05).
Discussion
BoT-A Botox possibly attenuates SCI-induced muscle spasticity by affecting the expression of Cav3.2 calcium channel subunit in the rat models. There may be multiple mechanisms for the function of BoT-A Botox. Further work is needed to be done to address these issues.
Data Sharing Statement
The data generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Ethical Approval
All surgical procedures and postoperative care were performed following the guidelines of the Animal Care and Use Committee of The First Hospital of Jilin University (approval No. AJLU28-18, Changchun, China). All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations of the Animal Experiment Ethics Committee of The First Hospital of Jilin University. Every effort was made to minimize the number and suffering of animals used in the present experiment.
Disclosure
The authors declare no competing interests.