301
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Difference in the effects of switching from Candesartan to Olmesartan or Telmisartan to Olmesartan in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes: the COTO study

, &
Pages 219-226 | Published online: 17 Feb 2014
 

Abstract

Purpose

This open-label controlled study compared the therapeutic efficacy of three representative angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes attending a hospital outpatient clinic. The primary measure in this study was morning home blood pressure (BP).

Patients and methods

Two studies were done concurrently to investigate the effects of switching from two different ARBs to olmesartan. Patients prescribed candesartan (8 mg once daily in the morning) or telmisartan (40 mg once daily in the morning) for 16 weeks were switched to olmesartan (20 mg once daily in the morning) for 16 weeks. Then, they were switched back to candesartan (CO group) or telmisartan (TO group) for another 16 weeks.

Results

Data from all patients in the CO group (n=165) and the TO group (n=152) were analyzed. Clinic and morning home BP and urinary albumin levels showed a significant decrease from baseline at 16 weeks after switching to olmesartan in both the CO and the TO group (clinic BP, morning home diastolic BP, and urinary albumin, P<0.05; morning home systolic BP, P<0.01). In contrast, clinic BP, morning home BP, and urinary albumin were significantly increased again 16 weeks after switching back to candesartan or telmisartan (clinic BP, morning home diastolic BP, and urinary albumin, P<0.05; morning home systolic BP, P<0.01). No subjects experienced an adverse reaction that required withdrawal from the study. No adverse reactions attributable to the study drugs were observed.

Conclusion

Olmesartan is a promising ARB for BP control in hypertensive type 2 diabetics.

Acknowledgments

Medical editorial assistance was provided by Nature Japan K.K. (Macmillan Medical Communications, Tokyo, Japan) and funded by Daiichi Sankyo Co, Ltd (Tokyo, Japan).

The sponsor had no control over the study design; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Disclosure

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.