68
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
PREGNANCY

Prenatal course and outcome in 103 cases of fetal spina bifida: a single center experience

, , , , &
Pages 1276-1283 | Received 14 Dec 2009, Accepted 01 Jul 2010, Published online: 17 Sep 2010
 

Abstract

Objective. To investigate the prenatal course and functional outcome for fetuses with spina bifida according to the level of the spinal lesion at prenatal ultrasound examination. Design. Retrospective, descriptive study. Setting. Tertiary referral center, Germany. Population. A total of 103 fetuses with spina bifida identified between 1993 and 2008. Methods. The antenatal course and postnatal outcome for affected fetuses were reviewed. The relation of relevant outcome domains to the anatomical level was assessed using Fisher's exact test and the χ2-test. Main outcome measures. Level and type of spinal lesion, pregnancy outcome, psychomotor development, bladder and bowel function. Results. Our cohort included a total of 31 live born infants, 68 terminated pregnancies, four intrauterine fetal deaths and five postnatal deaths. Four cases were excluded from follow-up. Twenty of the remaining 22 infants had normal or only slightly impaired mental development (91%). Thirteen children (59%) were able to walk, but nine (41%) needed wheelchairs or were paraplegic. The rate of poor motor outcome varied strongly in dependence on the level of the lesion (22.2% at lower lumbosacral levels to 80% at thoracic level). The majority of the affected children (16/22, 72.7%) suffered from impairment of bladder function. In 36% of cases (8/22) anal incontinence was documented. Conclusion. Spina bifida can result in a spectrum of disabilities that frequently lead to an impairment of bladder, bowel and motor function. The motor function depended on level of the lesion.

Acknowledgements

The contribution to data acquisition during the period of diagnosis by Martin Krapp, Ute Germer, Ulrich Gembruch and Roland Axt-Fliedner is acknowledged.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Notes

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.