68
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
PREGNANCY

Prenatal course and outcome in 103 cases of fetal spina bifida: a single center experience

, , , , &
Pages 1276-1283 | Received 14 Dec 2009, Accepted 01 Jul 2010, Published online: 17 Sep 2010

References

  • Chescheir NC. Maternal–fetal surgery: where are we and how did we get here? Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:717–31.
  • Garne E, Loane M, Dolk H, De Vigan C, Scarano G, Tucker D, Prenatal diagnosis of severe structural congenital malformations in Europe. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:6–11.
  • Chan A, Robertson EF, Haan EA, Ranieri E, Keane RJ. The sensitivity of ultrasound and serum alpha-fetoprotein in population-based antenatal screening for neural tube defects. South Australia 1986–1991. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102:370–6.
  • Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Fisher AJ, Smulian JC, Day-Salvatore D, Beazoglou T, Cost-benefit analysis of targeted ultrasonography for prenatal detection of spina bifida in patients with an elevated concentration of second-trimester maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:1227–33.
  • Blaas HG, Eik-Nes SH. Sonoembryology and early prenatal diagnosis of neural anomalies. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29:312–25.
  • Cameron M, Moran P. Prenatal screening and diagnosis of neural tube defects. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29:402–11.
  • D'Addario V, Rossi AC, Pinto V, Pintucci A, Di Cagno L. Comparison of six sonographic signs in the prenatal diagnosis of spina bifida. J Perinat Med. 2008;36:330–4.
  • Biggio JR Jr, Owen J, Wenstrom KD, Oakes WJ. Can prenatal ultrasound findings predict ambulatory status in fetuses with open spina bifida? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;185:1016–20.
  • Peralta CF, Bunduki V, Plese JP, Figueiredo EG, Miguelez J, Zugaib M. Association between prenatal sonographic findings and post-natal outcomes in 30 cases of isolated spina bifida aperta. Prenat Diagn. 2003;23:311–14.
  • Warsof SL, Abramowicz JS, Sayegh SK, Levy DL. Lower limb movements and urologic function in fetuses with neural tube and other central nervous system defects. Fetal Ther. 1988;3:129–34.
  • Shurtleff DB, Hayden PW, Loeser JD, Kronmal RA. Myelodysplasia: decision for death or disability. N Engl J Med. 1974;291:1005–11.
  • Bruner JP, Tulipan N. Tell the truth about spina bifida. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24:595–6.
  • Boyd PA, Wellesley DG, De Walle HE, Tenconi R, Garcia-Minaur S, Zandwijken GR, Evaluation of the prenatal diagnosis of neural tube defects by fetal ultrasonographic examination in different centres across Europe. J Med Screen. 2000;7:169–74.
  • Bowman RM, McLone DG, Grant JA, Tomita T, Ito JA. Spina bifida outcome: a 25-year prospective. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2001;34:114–20.
  • Mirzai H, Erahin Y, Mutluer S, Kayahan A. Outcome of patients with meningomyelocele: the Ege University experience. Childs Nerv Syst. 1998;14:120–3.
  • Steinbok P, Irvine B, Cochrane DD, Irwin BJ. Long-term outcome and complications of children born with meningomyelocele. Childs Nerv Syst. 1992;8:92–6.
  • Kalucy M, Bower C, Stanley F. School-aged children with spina bifida in Western Australia - parental perspectives on functional outcome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1996;38:325–34.
  • Lemelle JL, Guillemin F, Aubert D, Guys JM, Lottmann H, Lortat-Jacob S, A multicenter evaluation of urinary incontinence management and outcome in spina bifida. J Urol. 2006;175:208–12.
  • Appasamy M, Roberts D, Pilling D, Buxton N. Antenatal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in localizing the level of lesion in spina bifida and correlation with postnatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:530–6.
  • Breeze AC, Alexander PM, Murdoch EM, Missfelder-Lobos HH, Hackett GA, Lees CC. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes in severe fetal ventriculomegaly. Prenat Diagn. 2007;27:124–9.
  • Gaglioti P, Oberto M, Todros T. The significance of fetal ventriculomegaly: etiology, short- and long-term outcomes. Prenat Diagn. 2009;29:381–8.
  • Wax JR, Bookman L, Cartin A, Pinette MG, Blackstone J. Mild fetal cerebral ventriculomegaly: diagnosis, clinical associations, and outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003;58:407–14.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.