Publication Cover
Xenobiotica
the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems
Volume 41, 2011 - Issue 12
421
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Animal Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism

Preclinical assessment of novel BRAF inhibitors: integrating pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling in the drug discovery process

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1076-1087 | Received 23 Mar 2011, Accepted 04 Jul 2011, Published online: 25 Aug 2011
 

Abstract

  1. The objective of these studies were to determine the preclinical disposition of the two BRAF inhibitors, G-F and G-C, followed by pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) modelling to characterize the concentration-efficacy relationship of these compounds in the Colo205 mouse xenograft model. With G-F, the relationship of pERK inhibition to concentration was also characterized.

  2. Compounds G-F and G-C were administered to mice, rats and dogs and the pharmacokinetics of G-F and G-C was determined. In addition, using indirect response models the concentration-efficacy relationship was described.

  3. The clearance of G-F was low; 0.625 and 4.65 mL/min/kg in rat and dog respectively. Similarly, the clearance of G-C was low in rat and dog, 0.490 and 4.43 mL/min/kg, respectively. Both compounds displayed low volumes of distribution (0.140–0.267 L/kg), resulting in moderate half-lives across species (~2.5 to 4 h). Bioavailability was formulation dependent and decreased with increasing dose. Using the indirect response models, the KC50 (50% Kmax; maximal response) value for tumor growth inhibition for G-F and G-C were 84.5 and 19.2 μM, respectively. The IC50 for pERK inhibition in Colo205 tumors by G-F was estimated to be 29.2 μM.

  4. High exposures of G-F and G-C were required for efficacy. Despite good PK properties of low CL and moderate half-life, limitations in obtaining exposures adequate for safety testing in rat and dog resulted in development challenges.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Array BioPharma and Genentech colleagues in the Translational Oncology, DMPK and In Vivo Studies Group for their contributions in generating data for this study.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.