Publication Cover
Inhalation Toxicology
International Forum for Respiratory Research
Volume 25, 2013 - Issue 14
195
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Estimating safe human exposure levels for lunar dust using benchmark dose modeling of data from inhalation studies in rats

, &
Pages 785-793 | Received 02 Aug 2013, Accepted 24 Sep 2013, Published online: 04 Dec 2013
 

Abstract

The pulmonary toxicity of airborne lunar dust was assessed in rats exposed by nose-only inhalation to 0, 2.1, 6.8, 20.8 and 60.6 mg/m3 of respirable size lunar dust. Rats were exposed for 6 h/d, 5 d/week, for 4 weeks (120 h). Biomarkers of toxicity were assessed in bronchial alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) collected at 1 d, 1 week, 4 weeks or 13 weeks post-exposure for a total of 76 endpoints. Benchmark dose (BMD) analysis was conducted on endpoints that appeared to be sensitive to dose. The number of endpoints that met criteria for modeling was 30. This number was composed of 13 endpoints that produced data suitable for parametric analysis and 17 that produced non-normal data. Mean BMD values determined from models generated from non-normal data were lower but not significantly different from the mean BMD of models derived from normally distributed data. Thus BMDs ranged from a minimum of 10.4 (using the average BMD from all 30 modeled endpoints) to a maximum of 16.6 (using the average BMD from the most restricted set of models). This range of BMDs yields safe exposure estimate (SEE) values of 0.6 and 0.9 mg/m3, respectively, when BMDs are extrapolated to humans, using a species factor of 3 and extrapolated from a 1-month exposure to an anticipated 6-month lunar surface exposure. This estimate is very similar to a no-observable-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) determined from the same studies (0.4 mg/m3) and a SEE derived from a study of rats that were intratracheally instilled with lunar dusts (0.5–1.0 mg/m3).

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the members of NASA Lunar Airborne Toxicity Assessment Group and the Non-Advocate Review Committee, assembled by NASA, for their advice on the lunar dust toxicity project; B. Cooper, L. Taylor and D. McKay for technical advice on the mineralogy of lunar dust; S. Bassett, C. Garza, D. Martin, R. Miller, S. Zalesak and the staff of the NASA JSC Clinical Laboratory for technical assistance; and J. Krauhs for editorial assistance.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.