Acceptance of preventive treatment in migraine patients: Results of a survey

Abstract

Background: The number of migraine patients eligible for preventive treatment is considerably higher than the number of patients actually using it. This study explores reasons for this discrepancy. Methods: An explorative survey among patients and their general practitioners (GPs) participating in a trial on preventive medication. Migraine patients who were eligible for preventive treatment (n = 75) attended an evaluation consultation with their GP to optimize migraine treatment. GPs and patients who did not start preventive treatment were asked if they had discussed the possibility of preventive treatment and, if so, why they decided not to start it. Results: Of the 32 GPs, 8 (25%) did not discuss the possibility of preventive treatment with their patients; in 4 because of perceived lack of effectiveness. Patients who did not start preventive treatment (n = 43) used less triptans and had less psychological distress compared to those who did start (n = 32). Main reasons for patients not starting were negative attitudes towards medication in general, fear of medication side-effects, previous unsuccessful attempts, attacks not being severe enough, and impact of migraine on daily life acceptable.

Conclusion: The decision of the individual patient and their GP to start preventive treatment is not only determined by attack frequency, but also depends on the impact of the headache attacks on their daily life and their negative attitude towards medication.

Key words::

• migraine
• preventive treatment
• profylaxis
• general practice
• acceptance

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all patients and physicians who contributed to this research project.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.