Experienced continuity of care in patients at risk for depression in primary care

Abstract

Background: Existing studies about continuity of care focus on patients with a severe mental illness.

Objectives: Explore the level of experienced continuity of care of patients at risk for depression in primary care, and compare these to those of patients with heart failure.

Methods: Explorative study comparing patients at risk for depression with chronic heart failure patients. Continuity of care was measured using a patient questionnaire and defined as () number of care providers contacted (personal continuity); () collaboration between care providers in general practice (team continuity) (six items, score 1–5); and () collaboration between GPs and care providers outside general practice (cross-boundary continuity) (four items, score 1–5).

Results: Most patients at risk for depression contacted several care providers throughout the care spectrum in the past year. They experienced high team continuity and low cross-boundary continuity. In their general practice, they contacted more different care providers for their illness than heart failure patients did (P < 0.01). Patients at risk for depression experienced a slightly better collaboration between these care providers in their practice: a mean score of 4.3 per item compared to 4.0 for heart failure patients (P = 0.03). The perceived cross-boundary continuity, however, was reversed: a mean score of 3.5 per item for patients at risk for depression, compared to 4.0 for heart failure patients (P = 0.01).

Conclusion: The explorative comparison between patients at risk for depression and heart failure patients shows small differences in experienced continuity of care. This should be analysed further in a more robust study.

Keywords::

• continuity of patient care
• depression
• family practice
• mental disorders
• chronic somatic illness

ETHICAL APPROVAL

Ethics committee Arnhem-Nijmegen.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.