Abstract
A series of 2-(arylidene)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-4,4,4-trifluorobutane-1,3-diones (2–4), 4-(arylidene)-3-(4-chlorophenyl)-5-(trifluoromethyl)-4H-pyrazoles (5–7), 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-4,4,4-trifluoro-2-(2-(aryl)hydrazono)butane-1,3-diones (8, 9), 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-(2-(aryl)hydrazono)-5-(trifluoromethyl)-4H-pyrazoles (10, 11), 2-((3-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-phenyl-5-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)methylene)malononitrile (13), 2-((5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-phenyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)methylene)cycloalkan-1-ones (14, 15) and 1-(aryl)-3-(5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-phenyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)prop-2-en-1-ones (16, 17) were designed, synthesized and evaluated for their in vitro antitumor activity. 1-(4-Chlorophenyl)-4,4,4-trifluoro-2-(2-(4-methoxyphenyl)hydrazono)butane-1,3-dione (8) showed potential and broad spectrum antitumor activity compared to the known drug 5-FU with GI50, (6.61 and 22.60 µM), TGI (42.66 and <100 µM) and LC50 (93.33 and <100 µM) values, respectively. On the other hand, compound 8 yielded selective activities toward melanoma, colon, non-small lung and breast cancer cell lines compared with erlotinib and gefitinib. Molecular docking methodology was performed for compound 8 into binding site of B-RAFV600E and EGFR kinases which showed similar binding mode to vemurafenib (PLX4032) and erlotinib, respectively.
Declaration of interest
The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this research group No. (RG-1435-046).