2,882
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Technology adoption, acceptance, satisfaction and benefit: integrating various assistive technology outcomes

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (11)

Allison Bean, Kyle Harris, Hanna Kim, Carmen DiGiovine & Amy Miller Sonntag. (2023) A scoping review of communication outcomes measures in augmentative and alternative communication. Assistive Technology 0:0, pages 1-22.
Read now
Julia Amelie Hoppe, Helinä Melkas, Satu Pekkarinen, Outi Tuisku, Lea Hennala, Rose-Marie Johansson-Pajala, Christine Gustafsson & Kirsten Thommes. (2023) Perception of Society’s Trust in Care Robots by Public Opinion Leaders. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 39:13, pages 2589-2605.
Read now
Linda Shore, Adam de Eyto & Leonard O’Sullivan. (2022) Technology acceptance and perceptions of robotic assistive devices by older adults – implications for exoskeleton design. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 17:7, pages 782-790.
Read now
Heidi Pedersen, Patrick Stefan Kermit & Sylvia Söderström. (2021) “You have to argue the right way”: user involvement in the service delivery process for assistive activity technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 16:8, pages 840-850.
Read now
Natasha Layton, Diane Bell, Mary Ellen Buning, Shih-Ching Chen, Silvana Contepomi, Vinicius Delgado Ramos, Evert-Jan Hoogerwerf, Takenobu Inoue, Inhyuk Moon, Nicky Seymour, Roger O. Smith & Luc de Witte. (2020) Opening the GATE: systems thinking from the global assistive technology alliance. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 15:5, pages 484-490.
Read now
Marcia J. Scherer. (2019) Assistive technology selection to outcome assessment: the benefit of having a service delivery protocol. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 14:8, pages 762-763.
Read now
Lynn Gitlow, Blaire Janney, Caitlyn Lemery, Julianne McDonald, Bethany McGinley & Kristin Rabideau. (2019) How college students diagnosed with anxiety disorders and/or depression use everyday technology. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 14:8, pages 809-816.
Read now
Alyson Warland, Ioannis Paraskevopoulos, Emmanuel Tsekleves, Jennifer Ryan, Alexander Nowicky, Josephine Griscti, Hannah Levings & Cherry Kilbride. (2019) The feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a low-cost, virtual-reality based, upper-limb stroke rehabilitation device: a mixed methods study. Disability and Rehabilitation 41:18, pages 2119-2134.
Read now
Roger O. Smith, Marcia J. Scherer, Rory Cooper, Diane Bell, David A. Hobbs, Cecilia Pettersson, Nicky Seymour, Johan Borg, Michelle J. Johnson, Joseph P. Lane, S. Sujatha, PVM Rao, Qussai M. Obiedat, Malcolm MacLachlan & Stephen Bauer. (2018) Assistive technology products: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 13:5, pages 473-485.
Read now
Terje Sund & Åse Brandt. (2018) Adult Scandinavians’ use of powered scooters: user satisfaction, frequency of use, and prediction of daily use. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 13:3, pages 212-219.
Read now
Sajay Arthanat, Linda-Jeanne Elsaesser & Stephen Bauer. (2017) A survey of assistive technology service providers in the USA. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 12:8, pages 789-800.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (16)

Francesca Borgnis, Lorenzo Desideri, Rosa Maria Converti & Claudia Salatino. (2023) Available Assistive Technology Outcome Measures: Systematic Review. JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies 10, pages e51124.
Crossref
Francesca Toso, Rens Brankaert, Niels Hendriks, Lieke Lenaerts & Andrea Wilkinson. (2023) Reflecting on Living Labs as Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Networks to Evaluate Technological Products for People Living with Dementia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20:3, pages 1673.
Crossref
Marc Sampedro Pilegaard, Karen la Cour, Fjóla Baldursdóttir, Deidre Morgan, Lisa Gregersen Oestergaard & Åse Brandt. (2022) Assistive devices among people living at home with advanced cancer: Use, non‐use and who have unmet needs for assistive devices?. European Journal of Cancer Care 31:4.
Crossref
Frederic Fovet. 2022. Assistive Technologies for Differently Abled Students. Assistive Technologies for Differently Abled Students 88 112 .
Ben Oldfrey, Giulia Barbareschi, Priya Morjaria, Tamara Giltsoff, Jessica Massie, Mark Miodownik & Catherine Holloway. (2021) Could Assistive Technology Provision Models Help Pave the Way for More Environmentally Sustainable Models of Product Design, Manufacture and Service in a Post-COVID World?. Sustainability 13:19, pages 10867.
Crossref
Katarina Baudin, Angelina Sundström, Johan Borg & Christine Gustafsson. (2021) Decision-Making Is in the Making! Aspects of Decision-Making in the Area of Assistive and Welfare Technology—A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18:8, pages 4028.
Crossref
Joy Smiley Zabala. 2020. Assistive Technology to Support Inclusive Education. Assistive Technology to Support Inclusive Education 17 36 .
Dianne Chambers. 2020. Assistive Technology to Support Inclusive Education. Assistive Technology to Support Inclusive Education 1 16 .
Katarina Baudin, Christine Gustafsson & Susanne Frennert. (2020) Views of Swedish Elder Care Personnel on Ongoing Digital Transformation: Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 22:6, pages e15450.
Crossref
Katarina Baudin, Maria Mullersdorf, Angelina Sundstrom & Christine Gustafsson. (2020) The Policies of Provision of Assistive and Welfare Technology—A Literature Review. Societies 10:1, pages 22.
Crossref
Ricky Buchanan & Natasha Layton. (2019) Innovation in Assistive Technology: Voice of the User. Societies 9:2, pages 48.
Crossref
Martine M. Smith. (2019) Innovations for Supporting Communication: Opportunities and Challenges for People with Complex Communication Needs. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica 71:4, pages 156-167.
Crossref
Rose-Marie Johansson-Pajala, Kirsten Thommes, Julia A. Hoppe, Outi Tuisku, Lea Hennala, Satu Pekkarinen, Helinä Melkas & Christine Gustafsson. 2019. Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design for the Elderly and Technology Acceptance. Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design for the Elderly and Technology Acceptance 212 227 .
Pauline Boland, William M. M. Levack, Fiona P. Graham & Meredith A. Perry. (2018) User perspective on receiving adaptive equipment after stroke: A mixed-methods study. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 85:4, pages 297-306.
Crossref
Andrew Kerr, Mark Smith, Lynn Reid & Lynne Baillie. (2017) Adoption of Stroke Rehabilitation Technologies by the User Community (Preprint). JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies.
Crossref
Loek A. van der Heide, Uta R. Roentgen, Dick J. van der Pijl & Luc P. de Witte. (2017) How could the service delivery process of dynamic arm supports be optimized?. Technology and Disability 29:3, pages 101-108.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.