2,297
Views
149
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Complex disease, gender and epigenetics

, &
Pages 530-544 | Published online: 08 Jul 2009

Figures & data

Figure 1 Complex non‐Mendelian diseases displaying differential susceptibility to complex diseases (based on epidemiological data obtained from Harrison's ‘Principles of Internal Medicine’ 15th edition, 2001) Citation111.

Figure 1 Complex non‐Mendelian diseases displaying differential susceptibility to complex diseases (based on epidemiological data obtained from Harrison's ‘Principles of Internal Medicine’ 15th edition, 2001) Citation111.

Table I. Some loci and markers exhibiting gender‐specific evidence for association (A) and linkage (B) in complex diseases and traits. Not all significant findings from each reference are reported. A. Association studies:

B. Linkage studies:

Figure 2 In the absence of ligand or in the presence of antagonist, steroid receptors(SR) recruit transcriptional corepressor complexes to the DNA, producing an epigenetically silenced state through histone deacetylation or methylation. In the presence of hormone, SR recruit coactivator complexes, histone‐modifying machines or ATP‐dependent chromatin remodeling machines, to acetylate histones and produce a euchromatic chromatin formation suitable for transcriptional activation.

Figure 2 In the absence of ligand or in the presence of antagonist, steroid receptors(SR) recruit transcriptional corepressor complexes to the DNA, producing an epigenetically silenced state through histone deacetylation or methylation. In the presence of hormone, SR recruit coactivator complexes, histone‐modifying machines or ATP‐dependent chromatin remodeling machines, to acetylate histones and produce a euchromatic chromatin formation suitable for transcriptional activation.

Figure 3 Loci identified as significantly different in DNA methylation between male and female postmortem brain samples. DNA methylation profiles were measured by human CpG island microarrays in a common reference design. Each microarray interrogates 12,912 loci whose locations on the chromosomes are shown in white in the plot. Data were logarithmically transformed and then normalized, by the print‐tip loess method, to remove nonbiological effects. Vertically: human chromosomes 1 to 22. The t‐statistic of the male group versus female group was calculated for each locus and its P‐value was also obtained. Loci with P‐values below 0.05 are painted black in the plot.

Figure 3 Loci identified as significantly different in DNA methylation between male and female postmortem brain samples. DNA methylation profiles were measured by human CpG island microarrays in a common reference design. Each microarray interrogates 12,912 loci whose locations on the chromosomes are shown in white in the plot. Data were logarithmically transformed and then normalized, by the print‐tip loess method, to remove nonbiological effects. Vertically: human chromosomes 1 to 22. The t‐statistic of the male group versus female group was calculated for each locus and its P‐value was also obtained. Loci with P‐values below 0.05 are painted black in the plot.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.