Experiences of lower limb prosthesis users in Kenya: a qualitative study to understand motivation to use and satisfaction with prosthetic outcomes

Figures & data

Table 1. Participant Characteristics, *where information has a "-" it is because it was not known.

Participant (pseud-nym):	Gender	Age	Time since amputation	Time with prostheses	How many prostheses?	Cause	Distance from clinic/ Journey means	Travel time	Inpatient (IP)/ outpatient (OPC)	How did you hear about ADPK?
Neema	F	45	3 years	4 months	2	Wound on leg + diabetes	15 km: ferry crossing and car	2 h	IP	Hospital
Hamisi	M	41	10 years	10 years	2	Workplace accident	Public bus (Matatu)	2 h	IP	Neighbour
Ali	M	31	Primary school	Primary school	2	Trauma during football +  delayed presentation	150km: Public transport (Matatu + motor-bike)	-*	IP	Hospital
Juma	M	52	3 years	1 year	1	Wound + Diabetes	30 km Matatu	30–90 min.	IP	Cousin
Issa	M	24	13–14 years	13–14 years	2	Playing with bicycle, bus knocked into wall	Drives himself in tuk-tuk	30–45 min.	OPC	Friend
Aisha	F	60	–	2 years	1	Wound + diabetes	–	30 min.	IP	Hospital
Mohamed	M	39	20 years	19/20 years	7	Car accident	4–5 km	–	OPC	Father
Baraka	M	39	8 years	1 year	1	Car accident	- Taxi	50 min.	OPC	Friend and google
Chaka	M	34	7 years (bilateral)	4 years (from clinic in Nairobi)	1	Workplace accident	Not yet been	Not yet been	–	Brother
Abdi	M	25	2 years	2 years	2	Workplace accident	5 km Matatu	1-2 h	OPC	Hospital

Figure 1. Figure showing central concepts and codes of the theme development.

A purple and blue graphic displaying the central concepts and codes that were initially developed during the thematic analysis process.