References
- Liao C, Seghers F, Savage M, et al. Product narrative: prostheses [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://at2030.org/pn-prostheses/
- Harkins CS, McGarry A, Buis A. Provision of prosthetic and orthotic services in low-income countries: a review of the literature. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2013;37(5):353–361.
- International Diabetes Federation. IDF diabetes atlas. Ninth edition [Internet]. 2019. [cited 2020 Jun 22]. Available from: https://www.diabetesatlas.org/upload/resources/material/20200302_133351_IDFATLAS9e-final-web.pdf
- Murray CD, Fox J. Body image and prosthesis satisfaction in the lower limb amputee. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(17):925–931.
- Davidson JH, Jones Le Cornet J, Cittarelli T, et al. Disability and Rehabilitation Management of the multiple limb amputee Management of the multiple limb amputee. 2009. [cited 2020 Jun 16]; Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=idre20
- Hamamura S, Chin T, Kuroda R, et al. Factors affecting prosthetic rehabilitation outcomes in amputees of age 60 years and over. J Int Med Res. 2009;37(6):1921–1927.
- Liu F, Williams RM, Liu HE, et al. The lived experience of persons with lower extremity amputation. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19(15–16):2152–2161.
- Murray CD, Forshaw MJ. The experience of amputation and prosthesis use for adults: a metasynthesis. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(14):1133–1142.
- WHO. Standards for prosthetics and orthotics. Part 2: implementation manual [Internet]. 2017. [cited 2020 Aug 13]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/bookorders
- Jefferies P, Gallagher P, Philbin M. Being “just normal”: a grounded theory of prosthesis use. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(15):1754–1763.
- ATscale. Strategy overview [Internet]. 2019. [cited 2019 Oct 31]. Available from:
- Coduti W, Schoen B. Hope model: a method of goal attainment with rehabilitation services clients. J Rehabil. 2014;80(2):30–40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267391857
- WHO. WHO | Assistive devices/technologies: what WHO is doing [Internet]. World Health Organization; 2016. [cited 2020 Aug 2]. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/technology/activities/en/
- Holloway C, Austin V, Barbareschi G, et al. Scoping research report on assistive technology on the road for universal assistive technology [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.disabilityinnovation.com/uploads/images/AT-Scoping-Report_2019-compressed-19.pdf
- Hub GDI. AT2030 Testing “what works” to enable access to life-changing assistive technology for all [Internet]. 2019. [cited 2020 Jun 11]. Available from: https://www.at2030.org/at3030-leaflet/
- Arabian A, Varotsis D, McDonnell C, et al. Global social acceptance of prosthetic devices. Seattle (WA): GHTC 2016 - IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference: Technology for the Benefit of Humanity, Conference Proceedings. 2016. p. 563–568.
- O’Keeffe B, Rout S. Prosthetic rehabilitation in the lower limb. Indian J Plast Surg. 2019;52(1):134–143.
- Dickinson A, Donovan-Hall M, Kheng S, et al. Technologies to enhance quality and access to prosthetics & orthotics: the importance of a multidisciplinary, user-centred approach. WHO Global Report on Assistive Technology (GReAT) Consultation. Geneva: WHO; 2019. 10.5258/soton/p0014
- Karakoç M, Batmaz I, Sariyildiz M, et al. Sockets manufactured by CAD/CAM method have positive effects on the quality of life of patients with transtibial amputation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. [Internet]. 2017;96(8):578–581. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28085736/
- Williams R, Oldfrey B, Holloway C. AT2030 innovation insights: an AT innovator case study: Amparo [Internet] 2020. [cited 2021 Jul 25]. Available from: www.AT2030.org
- Junsaard T, Poomulna J, Chiablam C, et al. A study of mobile prosthetic services model with a proactive and integrated approach in Thailand aimed at achieving 100% accessibility for people with movement disabilities. J Dep Med Serv. 2018;43(4):65–71. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JDMS/article/view/247885/168378
- Marino M, Pattni S, Greenberg M, et al. Access to prosthetic devices in developing countries: pathways and challenges. Proceedings of the 5th IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference, GHTC 2015. Seattle (WA): Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.; 2015. p. 45–51. [cited 2021 Oct 24]. Available from: https://pennstate.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/access-to-prosthetic-devices-in-developing-countries-pathways-and
- Williams RJ, Takashima A, Ogata T, et al. A pilot study towards long-term thermal comfort research for lower-limb prosthesis wearers. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019;43(1):47–54.
- Maclean N, Pound P. A critical review of the concept of patient motivation in the literature on physical rehabilitation. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50(4):495–506.
- Schaffalitzky E, Gallagher P, Maclachlan M, et al. Developing consensus on important factors associated with lower limb prosthetic prescription and use. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(24):2085–2094.
- Sansam K, O'Connor RJ, Neumann V, et al. Clinicians’ perspectives on decision making in lower limb amputee rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(5):447–453.
- Kam S, Kent M, Khodaverdian A, et al. The influence of environmental and personal factors on participation of lower-limb prosthetic users in low-income countries: prosthetists’ perspectives. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(3):245–251.
- Ostler C, Ellis-Hill C, Donovan-Hall M. Expectations of rehabilitation following lower limb amputation: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(14):1169–1175.
- Schaffalitzky E, Gallagher P, Maclachlan M, et al. Understanding the benefits of prosthetic prescription: exploring the experiences of practitioners and lower limb prosthetic users. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(15–16):1314–1323. https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=idre20
- Christensen J, Langberg H, Doherty P, et al. Ambivalence in rehabilitation: thematic analysis of the experiences of lower limb amputated veterans. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(21):2553–2560.
- Gallagher P, Maclachlan M. Adjustment to an artificial limb: a qualitative perspective. J Health Psychol. 2001;6(1):85–100.
- Murray CD. “Don’t you talk to your prosthetist?” communicational problems in the prescription of artificial limbs. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(6):513–521.
- Naidoo U, Ennion L. Barriers and facilitators to utilisation of rehabilitation services amongst persons with lower-limb amputations in a rural community in South Africa. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019;43(1):95–103.
- Campbell DJT, Coll N, Thurston WE. Considerations for the provision of prosthetic services in post-disaster contexts: the Haiti Amputee Coalition. Disabil Soc. 2012;27(5):647–661.
- The World Bank. Kenya | Data [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2020 Aug 13]. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/country/KE
- APDK. Who we are – Association for the Physically Disabled of Kenya – APDK [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2020 Aug 13]. Available from: https://www.apdk.org/who-we-are/
- Braun V, Clarke V. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: SAGE Publications; 2013.
- Braun V, Clarke V. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qual Res Sport Exerc Heal. 2021;13(2):201–216. 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846
- Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol. 2021;18(3):328–352. https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=uqrp20
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
- Dejonckheere M, Vaughn LM. Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour. Fam Med Com Heal. 2019;7:57. http://fmch.bmj.com/
- Jamshed S. Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. J Basic Clin Pharm. 2014;5(4):87–88. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4194943/
- Ditchman N, Lee E-J, Huebner RA. Group procedures. In: Chan F, Berven N, Thomas K, editors. Counseling theories and techniques for rehabilitation and mental health professionals. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2015.
- Miller JF. Coping with chornic illness: overcoming powerlessness. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company; 2020.
- Murphy H. The importance of “soft” skills in healthcare professions - Elsevier education [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2020 Sep 5]. Available from: https://evolve.elsevier.com/education/expertise/faculty-development/the-importance-of-soft-skills-in-healthcare-professions/.
- Njue JR, Rombo D, Ngige L. Family strengths and challenges in Kenya. Marriage Fam Rev. 2007;41(1–2):47–70. https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=wmfr20
- Vlachaki A, Paterson AMJ, Porter SC, et al. Design for health exploring users’ attitudes towards prosthesis aesthetics in the UK and Greece. Des Heal. 2020. [cited 2020 Jul 12], 4(1):4–23. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rfdh20
- Murray CD. Embodiment and prosthetics. In: Gallagher P, Desmond D, MacLachlan M, editors. Psychoprosthetics. London: Springer London; 2008. p. 119–129.
- Hjelle KM, Vik K. The ups and downs of social participation: experiences of wheelchair users in Norway. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(25–26):2479–2489.
- Global Disability Innovation Hub. AT2030 [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2022 Aug 26]. Available from: https://at2030.org/