7,903
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Review on structural, nutritional and anti-nutritional composition of Teff (Eragrostis tef) in comparison with Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)

& | (Reviewing editor:)
Article: 1546942 | Received 20 Oct 2018, Accepted 07 Nov 2018, Published online: 22 Nov 2018

Figures & data

Table 1. Different types of the products developed from the teff

Figure 1. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrograph of section of quinoa grain. The notations in image are as follows: H: hypocotylradicle axis; C: cotyledons; F: funicle; P: perisperm; SC; seed coat; R: radicul tip (adapted from Arendt and Emanuele (Citation2013)).

Figure 1. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrograph of section of quinoa grain. The notations in image are as follows: H: hypocotylradicle axis; C: cotyledons; F: funicle; P: perisperm; SC; seed coat; R: radicul tip (adapted from Arendt and Emanuele (Citation2013)).

Figure 2. Median longitudinal section of the quinoa grain (adapted from Arendt and Emanuele (Citation2013)).

Figure 2. Median longitudinal section of the quinoa grain (adapted from Arendt and Emanuele (Citation2013)).

Figure 3. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) longitudinal cross section of teff grain (reprinted from Arendt and Emanuele (Citation2013)).

Figure 3. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) longitudinal cross section of teff grain (reprinted from Arendt and Emanuele (Citation2013)).

Table 2. Different types of the products developed from the Quinoa