1,153
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Clinical evaluation of 3D/3D MRI-CBCT automatching on brain tumors for online patient setup verification – A step towards MRI-based treatment planning

, , &
Pages 1085-1091 | Received 18 May 2010, Accepted 29 May 2010, Published online: 13 Sep 2010

Figures & data

Figure 1. The two sections of the multi–modality phantom used, here aligned with the setup positioning lasers on the treatment couch prior to CBCT scan.

Figure 1. The two sections of the multi–modality phantom used, here aligned with the setup positioning lasers on the treatment couch prior to CBCT scan.

Figure 2. A CT image of the two phantom sections used also showing the delineation into a Body structure, the upper section (Box 1) and lower section (Box 2). In the upper section the fish oil capsules are clearly visible along with small air encapsulations. The bright area in the left side of the lower section is a part of pre-hardened polyurethane containing a solution of BaSO4.

Figure 2. A CT image of the two phantom sections used also showing the delineation into a Body structure, the upper section (Box 1) and lower section (Box 2). In the upper section the fish oil capsules are clearly visible along with small air encapsulations. The bright area in the left side of the lower section is a part of pre-hardened polyurethane containing a solution of BaSO4.

Table I. Automatching parameters available for customization on the OBI. Selected settings are highlighted with italic.

Table II. Mean and standard deviations for the vertical, longitudinal and lateral errors for CT-CBCT and MRI-CBCT automatching.

Figure 3. Box plots showing the error distribution in the vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions for CT-CBCT and MRI-CBCT automatching, respectively. The plots contain all data points for both structures (Box 1 and Box 2). The whiskers extend from the minimum and maximum value. The box limits represents the 25th and 75th percentiles and the black lines the sample median.

Figure 3. Box plots showing the error distribution in the vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions for CT-CBCT and MRI-CBCT automatching, respectively. The plots contain all data points for both structures (Box 1 and Box 2). The whiskers extend from the minimum and maximum value. The box limits represents the 25th and 75th percentiles and the black lines the sample median.

Figure 4. Absolute difference in couch shift coordinates [mm] between CT-CBCT and MRI-CBCT automatching for the vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions. Data from all three patients are plotted and separated by the two vertical lines.

Figure 4. Absolute difference in couch shift coordinates [mm] between CT-CBCT and MRI-CBCT automatching for the vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions. Data from all three patients are plotted and separated by the two vertical lines.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.