Australian Speech-Language Pathologists' Perceptions and Experiences of Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Early Childhood Intervention

Abstract

Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) working in early childhood intervention are expected to have knowledge and skills across a number of areas and to engage in evidence-based practice. We explored the knowledge and perceptions of SLPs working with young children within Australian early childhood settings about augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), evidence-based practice, and barriers to such practice. Fourteen clinicians participated in group or individual interviews. Thematic analysis of the transcripts of these discussions revealed that they had a broad view of AAC and its benefits. Their reported assessment and intervention approaches reflected best practice as documented in the literature. The exception was in the implementation of family-centred practice. Although the participants involved families in their children's intervention, many appeared to use a directive approach. There was also evidence of struggling with families' negative attitudes about the use of AAC. A major barrier for these clinicians in implementing AAC and best practice was limited time in light of the many demands and expectations. Despite some frustration, these participants were passionate about their work and belief in the benefits of AAC for young children with varied communication difficulties. The results suggest that many expectations placed on clinicians within early childhood intervention settings may fail to take into account the everyday demands on their time, in a context of varied resources and support.

Keywords:

• Augmentative and alternative communication
• Speech-language pathology
• Early childhood intervention
• Complex communication needs

Acknowledgements

Thanks are extended to the speech-language pathologists who participated in this study and to Ms. Fiona Chan for her assistance with transcribing focus groups and interviews.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Note

1 Boardmaker is a registered trademark of Mayer-Johnson, Inc., Solana Beach, CA.