Australian Speech-Language Pathologists' Perceptions and Experiences of Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Early Childhood Intervention

References

• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2008a). Core knowledge and skills in early intervention speech-language pathology practice [Knowledge and Skills]. Available from: http://www.asha.org/policy
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2008b). Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists in early intervention: Technical report [Technical Report]. Available from http://www.asha.org/policy
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D. B., Aytch, L. S., Odom, S. L., Symons, F., Wolery, M. (1999). Early intervention as we know it. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 5, 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Balandin, S., Iacono, T. (1998). AAC and Australian speech pathologists: Report on a national survey. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 239–249.
   Google Scholar
• Beamish, W., Bryer, F. (1999). Practitioners and parents have their say about best practice: Early intervention in Queensland. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 46, 261–278.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Cress, C. J. (2004). Augmentative and alternative communication and language: Understanding and responding to parents' perspectives. Topics in Language Disorders, 24, 51–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cress, C. J., Marvin, C. A. (2003). Common questions about AAC services in early intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 254–272.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. (Ed.). (2007). Team around the child: Working together in early childhood intervention. Wagga Wagga: Kurrajong Early Intervention Service.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Human Services (2005). Early childhood intervention services (ECIS) program framework. Retrieved 16 May 2008 from: http://www.cyf.vic.gov.au/early-childhood-intervention/publications/framework2005
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, W. (2000). Best practice philosophy for community services for children and families. In W. Dunn (Ed.), Best practice occupational therapy in community service with children and families. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dunst, C. J., Boyd, K., Trivette, C. M., Hamby, D. W. (2002). Family-oriented program models and professional help giving practices. Family Relations, 51, 221–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fey, M., Warren, S., Brady, N., Finestack, L., Bredin-Oja, S., Fairchild, M., Sokol, S., Yoder, P. (2006). Early effects of responsivity education/ prelinguistic milieu teaching for children with developmental delays and their parents. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49, 526–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girolametto, L., Tannock, R. (1994). Correlates of directiveness in the interactions of fathers and mothers of children with developmental delays. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 1178–1192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grove, N., Walker, M. (1990), The Makaton Vocabulary: Using manual signs and graphic symbols to develop interpersonal communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Guralnick, M. (2005). An overview of the developmental systems approach to early intervention. In M. Guralnick (Ed.), The developmental systems approach to early intervention ( pp. 3–28). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmings, B., Hill, D., Davies, S. (2004). Evaluating a rural-based early childhood intervention service. Special Education Perspectives, 13, 31–54.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgdon, L. A. (2000). Visual strategies for improving communication: Practical supports for school and communication. Michigan: QuirkRoberts Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T. (1999). Language intervention in early childhood. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 46, 383–420.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T. (2004). The evidence base for augmentative and alternative communication. In S. Reilly, J.Douglas, J.Oates (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in speech pathology ( pp. 288–313). London: Whurr Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Iacono, T., Carter, M., Hook, J. (1998). Identification of intentional communication in students with severe and multiple disabilities. Augmentative & Alternative Communication, 14, 102–114.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, S., Nelson, C., Evans, J., Palazolo, K. (2003). The use of visual supports in teaching young children with Autism Spectrum Disorder to initiate interactions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 86–103.
   Google Scholar
• Kent-Walsh, J., Light, J. (2003). General education teachers' experiences with inclusion of students who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 104–124.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, C., Hayes, A. (2005). Early intervention in Australia. In M. Guralnick The developmental systems approach to early intervention (Ed.), ( pp. 401–423). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• King, G., King, S., Rosenbaum, P., Goffin, R. (1999). Family-centred care giving and well-being of parents of children with disabilities: Linking process with outcome. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 24, 41–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, R., Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, S., Loiselle, C. (2008). Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62, 228–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J., Garrett, Z., Nye, C. (2008). Speech and language therapy interventions for children with primary speech and language delay or disorder (Review). The Cochrane Collaboration, 1, 1–62.
   Google Scholar
• Law, M., King, G., Hurley, M., Rosenbaum, P. (2003). Factors affecting family-centred service delivery for children with disabilities. Child: Care, Health & Development, 29, 357–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, G., Powell, A. (1988). Modifying parent-child interaction: Enhancing the development of handicapped children. The Journal of Special Education, 22, 82–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manolson, A. (1992). It takes two to talk: A parent's guide to helping children communicate. Toronto, Ontario: Hanen Centre Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, D., Light, J., Schlosser, R. (2006). The impact of augmentative and alternative communication on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: A research review. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 49, 248–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirenda, P., Brown, K. (2008). A picture is worth a thousand words: Using visual supports for augmented input with individuals with autism. In P. Mirenda, T.Iacono (Eds.), Autism and AAC ( pp. 303–332). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• QSR International (1999–2002). NVivo v2 [Computer software]. Melbourne: QSR International Pty. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Raghavendra, P., Murchland, S., Bentley, M., Wake-Dyster, W., Lyons, T. (2007). Parents' and service providers' perceptions of family-centred practice in a community-based, paediatric disability service in Australia. Childcare, Health and Development, 33, 586–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, J., Karlan, G. (1985). the selection of an augmentative system of communication intervention: A critique of decision rules. Journal of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 146–156.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, S. (2004). What constitutes evidence? In S. Reilly, J.Douglas, J. Oates (Eds.), Evidence based practice in speech pathology ( pp. 18–34). London: Whurr.
   Google Scholar
• Romski, M. A., Sevcik, R. (2005). Augmentative communication and early intervention: Myths and realities. Infants and Young Children, 18, 174–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R., Sigafoos, J. (2006). Augmentative and alternative communication interventions for persons with developmental disabilities: narrative review of comparative single-subject experimental studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 1–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosser, R. W., Raghavendra, P. (2004). Evidence-based practice in augmentative and alternative communication. AAC, 2, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Scope (2004). More than my child's disability: A study of family-centered practices and family experiences of Scope early childhood intervention services and supports. (Research Project). Melbourne: Scope (Vic).
   Google Scholar
• Sevcik, R., Romski, M. A., Adamson, L. B. (2004). Research directions in augmentative and alternative communication for preschool children. Disability & Rehabilitation, 26, 1323–1329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, M. E. (2002). Using dynamic assessment with learners who communicate nonsymbolically. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 163–176.
   Google Scholar
• The Hanen Centre. (2007). Hanen around the world. Retrieved 12 September 2008 from: http://www.hanen.org/web/Home/AboutHanen/HanenAroundtheWorld/tabid/69/Default.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, S., Gazdag, G. (1990). Facilitating early language intervention with milieu intervention procedures. Journal of Early Intervention, 14, 62–86.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K., Hennig, S. (2007). The state of research and practice in augmentative and alternative communication for children with development/intellectual disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 58–69.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoder, P., Warren, S., Hull, L. (1995). Predicting children's responses to prelinguistic communication intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 19, 74–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangari, C., Lloyd, L., Vicker, B. (1994). Augmentative and alternative communication: An historic perspective. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 27–59.
   Google Scholar