1,324
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Bacterial adaptation to the gut environment favors successful colonization

Microbial and metabonomic characterization of a simplified microbiota mouse model

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 307-318 | Published online: 01 Nov 2011

Figures & data

Table 1. Bacterial strains used for mouse inoculation with their respective growth media and primers used for real-time PCR enumeration

Figure 1. Experimental set up. Five groups of mice (males in groups A–D; females in group E) were individually caged and distributed into 5 isolators. Different bacterial suspensions (mixes or pure cultures) were inoculated at several time points between days 0 and 14 (see also ). On day 14, mice from groups D and E were removed from their individual cages and mixed with the other mice from the same group. On day 56, 3 GF mice were introduced into the isolators containing groups D and E. All animals received standard chow diet. p.i., post-inoculation.

Figure 1. Experimental set up. Five groups of mice (males in groups A–D; females in group E) were individually caged and distributed into 5 isolators. Different bacterial suspensions (mixes or pure cultures) were inoculated at several time points between days 0 and 14 (see also Table 2). On day 14, mice from groups D and E were removed from their individual cages and mixed with the other mice from the same group. On day 56, 3 GF mice were introduced into the isolators containing groups D and E. All animals received standard chow diet. p.i., post-inoculation.

Table 2. Protocol for the second mouse inoculation experiment

Figure 2. Colonization pattern in mice from groups A and D. Individual bacterial strains were quantified by real-time PCR in feces collected between days 3 and 70 post-inoculation and values are expressed as log10(cells) g−1 of feces. Dots represent bacterial counts in individual mice. Mean values are shown as lines between dots. The detection limit is approximately 106 cells g−1.

Figure 2. Colonization pattern in mice from groups A and D. Individual bacterial strains were quantified by real-time PCR in feces collected between days 3 and 70 post-inoculation and values are expressed as log10(cells) g−1 of feces. Dots represent bacterial counts in individual mice. Mean values are shown as lines between dots. The detection limit is approximately 106 cells g−1.

Figure 3. Transfer of the simplified microbiota from colonized mice to GF mice. Three GF male mice were introduced in the isolator containing mice from group D on day 56 post-inoculation. Individual bacterial strains were quantified by real-time PCR in feces collected at days 2, 7 and 14 after transfer of the GF mice and values are expressed as log10 (cells) g−1 of feces. Numbers in parenthesis indicate day post-inoculation of mice in group D. Dots represent values from individual mice. Mean values are shown as lines between dots. The detection limit is approximately 106 cells g−1.

Figure 3. Transfer of the simplified microbiota from colonized mice to GF mice. Three GF male mice were introduced in the isolator containing mice from group D on day 56 post-inoculation. Individual bacterial strains were quantified by real-time PCR in feces collected at days 2, 7 and 14 after transfer of the GF mice and values are expressed as log10 (cells) g−1 of feces. Numbers in parenthesis indicate day post-inoculation of mice in group D. Dots represent values from individual mice. Mean values are shown as lines between dots. The detection limit is approximately 106 cells g−1.

Table 3. Summary of variations of plasma (P) and urinary (U) metabolite signals obtained by pairwise comparisons between animals harboring 3 (pooled data from groups A, B and C), 9 (group D; males) and 8 (group E; females) bacterial strains

Figure 4. O-PLS-DA cross-validated scores plot derived from 1H NMR spectra of urine (A) and plasma (B) and (C) [NOESY (B) and CPMG (C) acquisition] from mice harboring three bacteria (groups A, B and C; males), nine bacteria (group D; males) and eight bacteria (group E, females).

Figure 4. O-PLS-DA cross-validated scores plot derived from 1H NMR spectra of urine (A) and plasma (B) and (C) [NOESY (B) and CPMG (C) acquisition] from mice harboring three bacteria (groups A, B and C; males), nine bacteria (group D; males) and eight bacteria (group E, females).
Supplemental material

Additional material

Download Zip (453.8 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.