469
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Comparing the effectiveness of the learning material and the learning method in students’ achievement in chemistry lesson on chemical changes

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 1372-1393 | Published online: 13 Jun 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Background

Research on chemistry education has found that students have commonly some difficulties in understanding chemical changes. These difficulties in the learning process have negatively affected students’ success. For this reason, it is very important to overcome students’ learning difficulties with new materials that prevent the occurrence of misconceptions and effective learning methods.

Purpose

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the learning method and the learning material in high-school students’ achievements in chemical changes.

Sample

The population of the study consisted of 92 students from three-ninth grade high-school classes in Izmir, Türkiye (NGroup-I = 30, NGroup-II = 30 and NGroup-III = 32).

Design and methods

The present study in which a pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design was used, was conducted with three groups. Group-I learned via the jigsaw technique using newly developed learning material. Group-II learned via the same technique using the current chemistry syllabus. Group-III learned by using the current chemistry syllabus in a teacher-centred environment. The effectiveness of the learning material was determined by comparing Group-I and Group-II, the effectiveness of the jigsaw technique of cooperative learning used by comparing Group-II and Group-III, and the effectiveness of both learning method and learning material was determined by comparing Group-I and Group-III. After the experiment process, a concept test was administered to identify students’ understanding of chemical changes. To determine the students’ misconceptions and their views about the learning method, semi-structured interviews were also conducted.

Results

The results of the concept test indicated that the mean score of Group-II was significantly higher than that of Group-III, and the mean score of Group-I was significantly higher than that of Group-II.

Conclusion

The results of this study showed that the learning material played a greater role than the learning method in achievement and the prevention of misconceptions regarding chemical changes.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

ISS Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 1,007.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.