4,899
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Inactivation kinetics of food-borne pathogens subjected to thermal treatments: a review

, , &
Pages 177-188 | Received 21 Apr 2017, Accepted 23 Aug 2017, Published online: 02 Mar 2018

Abstract

Thermal processing technologies are safe and easy to control methods without leaving residues, and could be used to inactivate food-borne pathogens, ensure food quality and provide the food with sufficient stability during storage. Establishing inactivation kinetics of food-borne pathogens is essential in developing effective pasteurisation protocols without damaging food quality. This study presents a comprehensive review of recent progresses in inactivation kinetics of food-borne pathogens. It covers theoretical bases and experimental methods for developing thermal inactivation kinetics of food-borne pathogens and making comparisons and applications of the common thermal death kinetic models. Finally, it proposes possible recommendations on the future research directions of establishing inactivation kinetic models for food-borne pathogens in thermal processing.

Introduction

Foods contaminated with food-borne pathogens are of great food safety concerns to consumers, manufacturers and regulatory agencies. shows food-borne outbreaks associated with foods, such as meat, tomato and low-moisture food contaminated by Salmonella spp, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes and E. sakazakii [Citation1–9]. Thermal processing technology has been used and approved by regulatory and international agencies to inactivate food-borne pathogens and ensure food stability. It includes conventional and novel thermal processing technologies. Conventional thermal technologies, such as hot air, hot water, hot oil and steam, can be efficiently used to eliminate Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in food [Citation10–14]. Novel thermal technologies, such as infrared (IR), radio frequency (RF), microwave (MW) and ohmic heating, can be effectively used for pasteurising food-borne pathogens. For example, IR has been used to inactivate Salmonella in almonds [Citation15]. RF heating has ability for pasteurising Salmonella in almonds [Citation16] and Salmonella and Escherichia coli O157: H7 on black and red pepper spices [Citation17]. MW is used for inactivating Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes in salsa [Citation18]. Ohmic heating has been used to inactivate Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes in orange and tomato juice [Citation19]. Populations of food-borne pathogens during heat treatment change with heating temperature, water activity (aw), heating rate, pH, heat shock, recovery medium and composition/physical characteristics of the foods [Citation20–27]. For example, when the ground beef inoculated with Escherichia coli O157:H7 was cooked in a water bath for 1 h at temperature of 55–62.5 °C, the D-value (the time required at a certain temperature to reduce a specific microbial population by 90% or by a factor of 10) was significantly lower in ground beef adjusted with pH 4.5 than pH 5.5 [22]. The heat resistance as explained by D-value of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef decreased with the addition of arvacrol and cinnamaldehyde [Citation21]. Water activity, aw, is an effective measure of the availability of water in a food system. It is defined as the ratio of the vapour pressure in food and the saturated vapour pressure of water at the same temperature. The range of aw is normally from 0.0 to 1.0. If the water activity of food is less than 0.6, almost all microbial activities are inhibited. As the aw value increases from 0.0 to 1.0, the heat resistance (D-value in min) of food-borne pathogens decreases. For example, the heat resistance of Salmonella PT 30 in almond kernels with water activity of 0.601 is higher than that of 0.946 [Citation20]. However, only limited numbers of temperature–time combinations for food-borne pathogens can be used for experiments due to labour costs and time limitations.

Table 1. Food-borne outbreaks associated with various foods contaminated with pathogens.

Models are effective tools in the development of thermal treatments for controlling pathogens in a more systematic and efficient manner compared with traditional methods. The kinetic models allow for prediction of the inactivation rate of pathogens with treatment times not only under isothermal but also non-isothermal conditions through other incorporated models. Therefore, thermal inactivation kinetic models developed from carefully planned experiments are used to estimate times and temperatures required to achieve specific log-reductions of food-borne pathogens.

In recent years, some research papers about thermal inactivation kinetics of pathogens in food and agricultural products have been published. For example, inactivation kinetics of Salmonella spp. under conventional and novel thermal technologies are reviewed but only the primary model (the food-borne pathogen evolution as a function of heating time) is concerned [Citation28]. However, since the inactivation kinetics are actually influenced by several factors, such as different bacterial strains, age of the culture, food composition (fat, NaCl, pH and aw), processing parameters, and physiological state of the organisms, some researchers have established secondary models for predicting survival curves under different conditions [Citation20,Citation24,Citation29–32]. Also omnibus models incorporating the primary and the secondary models are further considered for predicting survival curves of pathogens [Citation23,Citation33,Citation34]. So far, there is little systematic review on complex inactivation kinetics of food-borne pathogens subjected to thermal treatments.

Objectives of this review are to present an overview of the recent research progress in thermal inactivation kinetics of food-borne pathogens. It involves theory foundations and experimental methods, and makes the comparison among the common thermal death kinetic models. Finally, this review proposes possible recommendations on developing trends and research directions for achieving food-borne pathogen inactivation in thermal processing.

Definitions of kinetic models

Mathematical models are becoming important tools for describing and predicting the growth, survival and inactivation responses of pathogens under specific environmental conditions. Typically, a predictive kinetic model comprises two parts, namely, a primary model that describes the food-borne pathogen evolution as a function of heating time. Secondary model was developed by using second-order response surface regression or step-wise regression to predict D-value or some other parameters got from primary model according to any other independent variables, such as pH, water activity and heating rate, which are obtained by experiments. Omnibus models incorporating primary and secondary models are used for predicting survival curves with any specified values of independent variables, such as temperature, water activity, heating rate and so on. The model accuracy (goodness of fit of the experimental data to the models) is assessed by using the coefficient of determination R2, root mean square error (RMSE), accuracy factor parameter Af and bias factor Bf, which are showed as following: (1) (2) (3) (4) n means the number of measured data.

R2 measures how well further outcomes are predicted by a linear or nonlinear model. If R2 is close to one, it means high accuracy of the model [Citation35]. RMSE is used to measure the average deviation between the observed and predicted data sets. The lower RMSE value indicates the better fit of the data to the model [Citation36]. Af and Bf are used to estimate the percentage discrepancy between observed and estimated values [Citation37,Citation38].

Experimental methods to obtain thermal inactivation kinetic data

Pathogenic suspension directly subjected to heating

Pathogenic suspension directly subjected to heating is a common technique for studying thermal inactivation kinetics of pathogens [Citation39,Citation40]. Submerged coil heating apparatus is commonly used for determining the thermal inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes [Citation41] and Salmonella Serovars [Citation42]. The temperature range of this apparatus for determining thermal inactivation of pathogens is from 20 °C to 90 °C. Also, glass tube and test tube methods submerged in water baths are commonly used for studying the thermal inactivation of Entero-coccusfaecalis, E. coli and mould [Citation43–45]. For example, Boutibonnes et al. [Citation43] pipetted bacterial culture into glass tubes and placed into a 37 °C (control) water bath for characterising the heat shock response in Entero-coccusfaecalis. Lee and Kang [Citation44] placed inoculated tubes with E. coli suspension immersed in a water bath (55 °C). Fujikawa et al. [Citation45] compared the thermal inactivation kinetics of mould spores by using the glass capillary tube (1 mm in inner diameter) and test tube methods (10 mm in inner diameter) at the temperature of 60 °C for 14 min, and found that there were no significant differences in values of the inactivation rate and the delay of fast declines in survival curves between the two methods.

In addition to final temperature and holding time, heat resistance of a pathogen is mainly affected by sample compositions, pH values of the heating medium, and growth temperatures. Thermal kinetic models obtained by pathogen suspension may not be suitable for typical commercial preparation procedures in real food. For example, the D-value of E. coli O157:H7 at 55 °C is 15.4 min in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth [Citation46], 26.5 min in beef [Citation22] and 45.4 min in apple juice [Citation47].

Subjecting inoculated food to heating

Improved methods for obtaining information on kinetic response of food-borne pathogens should simulate the real environment for the pathogens in food samples. The experimental methods are developed based on different food states.

Studying thermal inactivation kinetics in liquid food

The liquid foods can be easily put in and taken out because of the fluidity, thus the tube methods in water or oil baths are commonly used for studying the thermal inactivation kinetics. Gabriel and Nakano [Citation47] placed inoculated apple juice in glass tubes and then heated in a water bath, and their results showed that the D55 value was the highest when the food-borne pathogens grew in 1% glucose before inoculated into apple juice. Huemer et al. [Citation48] used glass tubes in a silicone oil bath to study the thermal inactivation kinetics of spores of Bacillus sporothermodurans in milk. Odlaug and Pflug [Citation49] put tomato juice in an aluminium thermal-death-time tube (a tube made by aluminium is used for evaluating the population changes of food-borne pathogens with heating time at a given temperature) to study thermal resistance of clostridum botulinum spores. The heat resistance of the same pathogens under different test conditions showed differences in thermal inactivation kinetics [Citation50,Citation51]. For example, D-values obtained in 9-mm test tubes were about 8–29 times larger than those obtained using 3-mm capillary tubes for Yersinia enterocolitica strains in physiological saline at 60 °C due to non-isothermal test conditions in 9-mm test tubes. Test methods have been developed to eliminate non-isothermal conditions by thermal-death-time capillary tubes and aluminium test cells due to shorter come-up time (the time needed for the sample core temperature to reach the set-point temperature) [Citation50–54].

Studying the thermal inactivation kinetics in solid food

For solid food samples, such as a variety of meat, nuts and powder, the requirements for experiment methods are not only obtaining minimum come-up time, but also facilitating easy loading and unloading samples. Sterile bags are commonly used for pasteurisation of pathogens in meat samples since they can endure heating temperature. For example, sterile stomach bags (Whirl-Pak filter bags) are used for uniform thickness of less than 1 mm of ground beef [Citation30], ground chicken [Citation33], catfish and tilapia [Citation11], chicken shawirma [Citation55] and peanut butter [Citation56] for achieving short come-up time. Sterile nylon/polyethylene vacuum bags are applied for ground pork and turkey [Citation57] and almonds [Citation58]. Whirl-Pak filter bags are made of polyethylene and the same as sterile nylon/polyethylene vacuum bags. These bags can be used for pasteurisation of pathogens in solid food when the sample temperature is lower than 80 °C [Citation11,Citation30,Citation33,Citation55–58]. There have other methods to obtain thermal inactivation kinetics for pathogens in solid food, such as glass beaker/polypropylene jar in RF systems [Citation17,Citation59], polypropylene container in MW systems [Citation18], glass vials when the heating temperature above 100 °C [Citation60], aluminium thermal death tubes or cells for viscous materials, including solid foods with wide temperature ranges [Citation20,Citation61].

Studying inactivation kinetic models for liquid, semi-solid and solid foods

Aluminium test cells (TDT disk) designed by Chung et al. [Citation52] are widely used for determining the heat resistance of pathogens due to high thermal conductivity, good corrosion resistance, machinability, wide temperature range beyond 100 °C and ease of use [Citation20,Citation51–53]. It is made of aluminium alloy and consists of two parts: a base and a screwed-on cap to allow easy loading and unloading of the sample. The schematic diagram of aluminium cells is shown in . Gurtler et al. [Citation62] evaluated the glass capillary tube and TDT disk methods for determining thermal inactivation kinetics of Salmonella in liquid whole egg, and results showed that the D-value in the aluminium tube method was nearly the same as that in glass capillary tube method. Basaran-Akgul [Citation63] compared the glass capillary tube and aluminium tube methods for clostridium sporogenes PA 3679 inactivation in carrot juice, and reached the same conclusion. However, the capillary tube is not suitable for solid foods due to the difficulty of fitting samples into it. Aluminium test cells can be used for both liquid and solid samples.

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of aluminium cells (∅: 18 × H: 4 mm) [Citation52].

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of aluminium cells (∅: 18 × H: 4 mm) [Citation52].

Heating rates show a significant effect on thermo-tolerance of pathogens, and slower heating rates often result in enhanced heat resistance of pathogens with large D-values at the same target temperatures [Citation51,Citation53,Citation64]. Stephens et al. [Citation64] quantified the effect of heating rates on the thermal inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes with a programmable heating block, and the maximum thermo-tolerance was enhanced at rates of heating ≤0.7 °C/min. Foster et al. [Citation65] developed a new apparatus to control the heating rate for pasteurisation of pathogens in food by setting a starting temperature, an end temperature, heating time, hold time and cooling time by user-friendly software (). However, this apparatus only provides a fast heat treatment to the surface of single food sample, and could be improved by using the sample core temperature to cover the pathogen’s resistance over the whole volume and multiple samples to accelerate the experimental process [Citation66,Citation67].

Figure 2. Vertical section (a) and plan view (b) of the apparatus [Citation65].

Figure 2. Vertical section (a) and plan view (b) of the apparatus [Citation65].

A unique heating block system (HBS) has been designed to heat liquid, semi-solid and solid foods over a wide range of controlled heating rates for determining the inactivation kinetics of bacterial spores [Citation68]. The HBS consists of a heating unit, which is the same as aluminium test cell, a data acquisition/control unit, and a computer (). Heating rate, set-point temperature and holding time are controlled by the customised Visual Basic software and two PID controllers via a solid-state relay. This system can help in precisely characterising the heat resistance of pathogens in foods.

Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the TDT HBS [Citation68].

Figure 3. Schematic diagram of the TDT HBS [Citation68].

Thermal death kinetic models for food-borne pathogens

Models to describe the thermal inactivation kinetics for food-borne pathogens ranged from primary models () with the influence of temperature to omnibus models () with all influence factors, such as temperature, time, PH, water activity, heating rate, salinity, etc. This section introduces some of the most often-used models.

Table 2. Primary model of pathogens under thermal treatments.

Table 3. Secondary and omnibus model of pathogens under thermal treatments.

Primary modelling

First-order kinetic model

Many published studies on the thermal inactivation of pathogens in food products have shown the first-order thermal inactivation kinetic model [Citation20,Citation69–71] due to the uniform temperature assumption in the product during heat processing [Citation72]. The general form of the first-order kinetic model can be expressed as follows [Citation73] (5) where c represents microbial population, t is the heating time under isothermal conditions (min) and k is the rate constant (min−1). This equation can be integrated into a form below: (6) (7) (8) where c1 represents the initial microbial population and c is the final microbial population after heat treatment. The susceptibility of pathogens to heat at a specific temperature is characterised by the value of D, which is defined as the time (min) for one log reduction at a constant temperature. Plotting log D-values against temperature often reveals a linear relationship, commonly referred to the thermal death time curve. A z-value is obtained as the temperature increase (°C) needed to result in 1-log reduction of D-value from the thermal death time curve: (9) where DT is the value of D measured at temperature T, T1 and T2 are two different temperatures. The z-value is also obtained by the –1/slope of the regression equation of the log D-value against temperature.

For eukaryotic cells, first-order rate kinetics (Arrhenius) is usually used to describe eukaryotic inactivation, but there is a breakpoint around 42.5 °C due to the onset of thermo-tolerance below this threshold. The Arrehenius model has shown to hold up to 57 °C [Citation74]. For the pathogens, if these show the log-linear behaviour, first-order rate kinetics would be used to describe inactivation characteristics. However, most survival curves do not show log-linear behaviour, because of heterogeneity within the cell population, clumping of a small number of cells, poor heat transfer through the heating menstruum (non-uniform treatments), heat adaptation of pathogens during a heat treatment, protection by fat, protein content and dead cells, and inadequate enumeration methods. Deviations from the first-order kinetics have been frequently observed. This deviation must be taken into account to avoid under- or over-processing of food. Thermal inactivation kinetic models, such as Weibull’s survival curves, Biphasic, and Empirical sigmoid models, are commonly used to characterise the non-linear survival curves.

Weibull’s survival models

Microbial inactivation using conventional and novel thermal technologies often does not follow the first order kinetics. Sometimes it shows upward and downward concavities. Models derived from the Weibull distribution have the ability to describe these survival trends. The primary model [Citation73] of Weibull’s survival curves can be expressed as: (10) where P(t) is the momentary microbial count, P0 is the initial microbial count, b and n are temperature (T) dependent coefficients, b(T) is a rate parameter and n(T) is a measure of the semi-logarithmic survival curve’s concavity. When n(T) < 1, the curve presents an convex, suggesting that some microorganisms are more resistant than others or protected by various factors, which make them survive under testing conditions or the remaining population becomes progressing sturdier. When n(T) > 1, the curve is concave, indicating that accumulated damage makes the surviving cells more susceptible to lethal treatment. When n(T) = 1, it means a linear semi-logarithmic survival curve. Examples of published survival curves of Salmonella fitted with EquationEquations (5) and Equation(10) as primary model are shown in . The curve shown in presents a first order kinetic model and the Weibull distribution with convex, and the parameters in EquationEquations (5) and Equation(10) are used to generate the curves. Weibull’s survival curves can also be used to estimate the inactivation of Salmonella spp. under isothermal and non-isothermal conditions. EquationEquation (10) is used to estimate the inactivation of Salmonella spp. under isothermal conditions. EquationEquation (11) incorporating changed temperature over time is used to estimate the inactivation of Salmonella spp. for the non-isothermal process, and the momentary slope of non-isothermal is the same as isothermal at the momentary temperature [Citation57].

Figure 4. Heat inactivation kinetics of Salmonella Enteritidis PT 30 inoculated in almond kernel flour with water activity (aw) of 0.888 at different temperatures (○, 68 °C; △, 65 °C; ◇, 62 °C; □, 59 °C). — and … lines are the fits of the primary models: first order and Weibull survival curves, respectively [Citation20].

Figure 4. Heat inactivation kinetics of Salmonella Enteritidis PT 30 inoculated in almond kernel flour with water activity (aw) of 0.888 at different temperatures (○, 68 °C; △, 65 °C; ◇, 62 °C; □, 59 °C). — and … lines are the fits of the primary models: first order and Weibull survival curves, respectively [Citation20].
(11)

where T(t) is the time corresponds to the momentary logarithmic survival ratio When pathogens are primarily exposed to low heating rates, in which the cells are exposed to sub-lethal temperatures for long time and then to lethal temperature, the cell may yield heat adaptation, which can be estimated by using the Weibull inactivation model [Citation75]. The Weibull model could be used to estimate log-reduction of target pathogens when the sample temperature and exposure time are given during the heating process.

Biphasic model

Biphasic survival curves proposed by Kamau et al. [Citation76] can be used to express broken curves [Citation40], which represent a mix of two fractions of different heat resistances. The equation is shown as following: (12) where t1 is the critical time at which the rate changes, k1 and k2, are the temperature-dependent inactivation rates at the first and the second phases. Examples of published survival curves of Salmonella fitted with EquationEquation (12) as a primary model are shown in . It describes the heat resistance of Salmonella PT4 with high-density stationary-phase populations heated at 60 °C, and the curves show biphasic curves.

Figure 5. Biphasic thermal inactivation curves in Salmonella Enteritidis PT4. Mean numbers of survivors and standard deviations at 60 °C (a), 59 °C (b), 58 °C (c), 57 °C (d), 56 °C (e) and 55 °C (f), showing the best-fit lines for initial and tailing populations. The arrows indicate the limits of detection [Citation40].

Figure 5. Biphasic thermal inactivation curves in Salmonella Enteritidis PT4. Mean numbers of survivors and standard deviations at 60 °C (a), 59 °C (b), 58 °C (c), 57 °C (d), 56 °C (e) and 55 °C (f), showing the best-fit lines for initial and tailing populations. The arrows indicate the limits of detection [Citation40].

Several reactions leading to the population changes of pathogens can take place simultaneously. Those reactions can be parallel or sequential and their contributions to the overall heat resistances vary. This biphasic model represents a mix of two species or strains, which have different heat resistances, pathogen in broth with high-density stationary-phase populations or pathogen inoculated into agricultural products with lower water activity (aw < 0.6), such as flour, peanut butter and chocolate. For example, a mix of two species or strains having different heat resistances shows biphasic curves [Citation77]. The heat resistance of Salmonella PT4 with high-density stationary-phase populations heated at 60 °C shows biphasic curves due to the leakage from early heat casualties [Citation40]. When Salmonella weltevreden was inoculated into flour with an initial water activity range from 0.2 to 0.6 before heating, a biphasic curve was observed, which shows an initial rapid decline during the first 10 min, then followed by a linear survival curve [Citation78]. The thermal inactivation curves of Salmonella during milk chocolate conching at 70 °C show a rapid death in the first 180 min and then a lower inactivation of Salmonella [Citation10]. When peanut butter inoculated into Salmonella was heated in a circulating water bath at temperatures from 70 °C to 90 °C, the inactivation curves show rapid death in the first 10–20 min and follow by lower death rates thereafter [Citation79,Citation80]. These results demonstrate that, for any temperature, as the initial water activity of agricultural product was lower than 0.6 prior to heating, the thermal inactivation kinetics shows biphasic survival curves. That is because the food-borne pathogens may aggregate into particles within or near the aqueous phase, while others are located in more hydrophobic and fatty environment, and the solid particles are not fully overlaid by the fatty phase at the beginning of heating, which leads to less resistance.

Empirical sigmoid model

Empirical sigmoid model can be used to express asymptotic convex behaviour of a variety of pathogen survivor curves. It is justified by the existence of a distribution of heat resistance within the bacterial population [Citation81]. The equation is shown as following: (13) where a and b (>0) are location and dispersal parameters, which are estimated from experimental data, log N0 is the initial microbial count, log Nt is the number of cells at time t, and t approaches infinity when the derivative of the right side of EquationEquation (1) approaches 0. This model represents non-isothermal inactivation when “flat shoulder” and “lag period” are shown in . For example, survival curves of Listeria monocytogenes in broth are described by the sigmoid model under heat treatment at temperatures of 55, 60 and 65 °C after heat-shocking at 42 °C for 1 h with non-selective enumeration agar [Citation39]. When Salmonella serotypes were inoculated into ground chicken at three temperatures of 60, 65 and 71.1 °C and four concentrations of two antimicrobials (cinnamaldehyde and carvacrol), most inactivation curves display both upward concavity and tail, thus the sigmoid model is useful for predicting the heat resistance of Salmonella serotypes in ground chicken [Citation33]. Tailing phenomena should be considered when heat-damaged cells were repaired in foods to evaluate the efficiency of the food cooking process.

Figure 6. Empirical sigmoid curves of the (a) untreated, (b) heat-shocked and (c) selected cultures (subcultures of cells survived from a heat treatment of 60 °C for 20 min) of Listeria monocytogenes at (1) 55 °C and (2) 60 °C. Plotted points are the means of the observed values. The lines are the predicted survivor curves. Vertical bars indicate one standard deviation [Citation39].

Figure 6. Empirical sigmoid curves of the (a) untreated, (b) heat-shocked and (c) selected cultures (subcultures of cells survived from a heat treatment of 60 °C for 20 min) of Listeria monocytogenes at (1) 55 °C and (2) 60 °C. Plotted points are the means of the observed values. The lines are the predicted survivor curves. Vertical bars indicate one standard deviation [Citation39].

Secondary model

If the inactivation kinetics are approximately described by a primary model and the parameter dependences on all the pertinent factors are adequately elucidated for specific technologies and products, secondary model may be able to predict inactivation in similar matrices (similar independent variables) and under different operating conditions. Secondary model is developed by using response surface analysis or step-wise regression to predict D-value, b, n or 7.0 log relative reduction (Ln t7.0) based on the primary model, such as first-order, the Weibull or sigmoid model [Citation20,Citation30,Citation33,Citation82–84]. For example, secondary model developed from response surface analysis was used for predicting D-values of Salmonella PT30 in almonds for any combinations of temperature, aw and their interactions shown in EquationEquation (14) [Citation20], and D-values of L. monocytogenes for any combinations of temperature, sodium lactate and sodium diacetate in beef [Citation83]. A step-wise regression was used to determine the independent parameters to predict the Ln t7.0 values of Salmonella in ground chicken based on the sigmoid model [Citation33]. (14)

Global approach: omnibus models

Omnibus model is a model type that fits the primary and the secondary models at the same time by using all the data from the experimental curves [Citation24,Citation33,Citation34]. Based on the empirical sigmoidal model, the omnibus mixed-effect model is shown as following [Citation24]: (15)

The parameters of χ and β from the Weibull model are expressed as a function of the environmental variables: temperature (T), pH, salt percentage concentration (NaCl) and sodium pyrophosphate percentage concentration (SPP). u and v are added to the mean of the intercepts a1 and b1 due to some fraction of the variability in the scale and shape parameters. w means initial microbial concentration. log N0 is a variable from condition to condition. ε means residual error. log Nijk means concentration taken at the time k in the food sample i exposed at the environmental condition j.

Omnibus models are used to predict survival curves for any specified values of temperature, water activity, pH, NaCl and other parameters. Juneja et al. [Citation23] observed concave upward survival curves and developed an omnibus model for predicting times needed to obtain 6.5-log lethality between 55 °C and 71.1 °C in ground beef supplemented with salt (0–4.5%), sodium pyrophosphate (0–0.5%) and sodium lactate (0–4.5%). Juneja et al. [Citation33] also compared the accuracy of omnibus sigmoid model to that of omnibus log-linear model with tail for predicting the 7.0-log reduction times in ground chicken under three temperatures and four concentrations of two natural antimicrobials, as shown in . Juneja et al. [Citation24] developed a non-linear mixed effect omnibus model and indicated that the model can be used to assist meat processors in determining the processing times and temperatures required to achieve specific log reduction of E. coli O157:H7 in ground beef.

Figure 7. Survival curves of Salmonella in ground chicken for the different combinations of cinnamaldehyde and carvacrol concentrations at the temperature of 60 °C, as modelled by individual regressions and mix-effects omnibus regressions for both the log-linear with tail and the empirical sigmoidal inactivation models. Mean predicted value and 90% confidence intervals are shown for the omnibus regressions [Citation33].

Figure 7. Survival curves of Salmonella in ground chicken for the different combinations of cinnamaldehyde and carvacrol concentrations at the temperature of 60 °C, as modelled by individual regressions and mix-effects omnibus regressions for both the log-linear with tail and the empirical sigmoidal inactivation models. Mean predicted value and 90% confidence intervals are shown for the omnibus regressions [Citation33].

Omnibus model provides guidance on how changes in food formulation parameters affect the heat resistance of pathogens. It assists food processors to design thermal processes for estimating lethal treatment, i.e. the processing times and temperatures required to achieving specific log reductions of the pathogen, thus developing safe cooking processes. The model prediction accuracy would depend on the online measurement of operational conditions and food property changes during the heat process.

Model comparisons and applications

Selection of the appropriate primary and omnibus models depends on principle of parsimony and the goodness of fit: pooled variance, pooled Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC). Pooled variance is calculated as an average of variance, BIC is calculated as an average of the individually fitted curves weighed by the number of observations for each survival curve [Citation24,Citation33], and AIC is a measure of the relative quality of statistical models for a given set of data [Citation85]. The models with the lowest pooled variances, BIC and AIC, mean a good fit with a manageable number of parameters, and therefore are chosen for further analyses. For example, Juneja et al. [Citation33] compared pooled variances and BIC for each of the nine models in their research, and then concluded that the empirical sigmoid and log-linear models were the most parsimonious and chosen for further analyses. Then secondary model was obtained separately for parameters (such as a and b in the empirical sigmoid) from the primary model in terms of the independent variables. Lastly, models incorporating the primary and the secondary models were built for predicting survival curves with any specified values. For example, Juneja et al. [Citation33] reviewed two models for Salmonella serotypes in ground chicken, and recommended the omnibus sigmoid model to predict the 7.0-log lethality more accurately than the omnibus log-linear model with tail due to lower pooled variance and BIC.

Traditionally, D- and z-values are used for describing the efficacy of static pathogen inactivation treatment and F-values (the time required to achieve a specific reduction in microbial numbers at a given temperature) are used for evaluating that of a dynamic process. For the non-linear microbial inactivation kinetics during thermal treatment, traditional values cannot be employed, therefore, Weibull’s parameters, such as b and n, are used to calculate the time of the first decimal reduction [Citation86] or the time to reduce the number of microorganisms by a factor of 10 [Citation87]. Magnetic hyperthermia (MH) as an alternative chemical-free method was used for disinfecting food spoilage bacteria in planktonic cells and biofilms since they have a greater and faster bactericidal effect and can overcome the limitation of biocides by acting on microbial cells regardless of their metabolic states. Thus, it was a potential disinfection method in food-related environments [Citation88,Citation89]. The heat was produced under an applied oscillating magnetic field by spin relaxation processes. The mild heat value (MH-value) defined as the time needed to achieve a predefined microbial reduction at a reference temperature and a known thermal resistant constant is used to assess the efficacy of a mild thermal treatment, in which the inactivation kinetics are not log-linear [Citation90].

Conclusion and suggestions for future research

Several models have been used to study the thermal inactivation kinetics of food-borne pathogens. For example, first-order kinetic model expresses log-linear behaviours obtained from uniform heating treatment. Weibull’s models are used for estimating inactivation of pathogens under isothermal and non-isothermal conditions. Biphasic model expresses broken curves obtained from mixed species, which have different heat resistances, pathogen in broth with high-density stationary-phase populations or pathogen inoculated into agricultural products with lower water activity (aw < 0.6). The empirical sigmoidal model represents non-isothermal inactivation characteristics when “flat shoulder” and “lag period” are present. Secondary model was developed by using second-order response surface regression or step-wise regression to predict D-value or some other parameters got from primary model according to any other independent variables, such as pH, water activity and heating rate, which associated with experiment. Omnibus models incorporating primary and secondary models are used for predicting survival curves with any specified values of independent variables. The thermal inactivation kinetics of food-borne pathogens in meat and low moisture foods are studied by using ground meat, powder or other model foods, which have the same physicochemical characteristics with real food. That’s because in real food, there has complexity of various physical and chemical reactions in the process of heat treatment. Future research on developing thermal inactivation kinetic models associated with pasteurisation should focus on the following areas:

Applications of thermal inactivation kinetics of pathogens in real food

Due to some food quality characteristics, experimental conditions and some other restrictions, model food having the same physicochemical characteristics with real food has been widely used instead of an actual food matrix (real food with various independent variables, which are associated with experiment) to establish the thermal inactivation kinetics. The models made from model food are able to predict the pathogen behaviour in the most of the foods, but it is impractical to predict the process time required to achieve a 3-log reduction in the products with high sugar content and lower water activity. Since food is a complex system composed of a variety of ingredients, the interior of food may have physical or chemical reactions under heat treatment, and be accompanied by synergistic or antagonistic effects between reactions. Therefore, there have many unknown factors when using thermal inactivation kinetic model developed from the model food for guiding the heat treatment of real food. It is needed to conduct further research to validate the reliability and effectiveness of thermal inactivation kinetic model obtained from the model food.

Omnibus model needs to be developed and validated

Heating by conventional and novel thermal processing is influenced by the temperature, composition of materials, water activity, preheating, heating rate, heat shock protein and the type of heating equipment. However, the primary model only takes temperature and time into account, the secondary model assesses D-value or some other parameters got from primary model based on the pertinent factors, such as pH, water activity and heating rate, which associated with experiment. Omnibus models incorporating primary and secondary models are used for predicting survival curves with any specified values of independent variables. These models can be used for predicting survival curves under any specified environmental conditions, which associated with experiment. Therefore, omnibus models need to be properly established or validated first, and then used for predicting the destruction rate of the pathogens under commercial thermal processing conditions in the near future.

Non-isothermal conditions need to be considered

Many of the researchers rely on isothermal treatment conditions during heating to develop fundamental kinetic models. However, non-isothermal conditions in commodities during thermal treatment are commonly observed in real food, therefore heat transfer theory via simulation along with thermal inactivation kinetic models of pathogens should be considered together for pasteurisation of foods.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided by General Program of National Natural Science Foundation in China (31371853, 31772031) and National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0401004, 2017YFD0400900).

References

  • [CDCP]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Multistate outbreak of Salmonella bredeney infections linked to peanut butter manufactured by Sunland. Inc. [EB/OL]. Available from: http://wwwcdcgov/salmonella/bredeney-09-12/.
  • [CDCP]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Multistate outbreak of human Salmonella enteritidis infections linked to Turkish pinenuts. [EB/OL]. Available from: http://wwwcdcgov/salmonella/pinenuts-enteriditis/.
  • Keady S, Briggs G, Farrar J. (2004). Outbreak of Salmonella Serotype Enteritidis infections associated with raw almonds—United States and Canada. Morbid Mortal Week Rep 53:484–7.
  • Miller BD, Rigdon CE, Ball J, et al. (2012). Use of traceback methods to confirm the source of a multistate Escherichia coli O157:H7 outbreak due to in-shell hazelnuts. J Food Protect 75:320–7.
  • Neilk KP, Biggerstaff G, Macdonald JK, et al. (2012). A novel vehicle for transmission of Escherichia coli O157:H7 to humans: multistate outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 infections associated with consumption of ready-to-bake commercial prepackaged cookie dough—United States. Clin Infect Dis 54:511–8.
  • Van Doren JM, Neil KP, Parish M, et al. (2013). Foodborne illness outbreaks from microbial contaminants in spices. Food Microbiol 36:456–64.
  • Teramoto S, Tanabe Y, Okano E, et al. (2010). A first fatal neonatal case of Enterobacter sakazakii infection in Japan. Pediatr Int 52:312–3.
  • Mead PS, Slutsker L, Dietz V, et al. (1999). Food-related illness and death in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis 5:607–25.
  • Klontz K, Klontz J, Mody R, Hoekstra R. (2010). Analysis of tomato and Jalapeno and serrano pepper imports into the United States from Mexico before and during a national outbreak of Salmonella serotypes. J Food Protect 73:1967.
  • Nascimento Mda S, Brum DM, Pena PO, et al. (2012). Inactivation of Salmonella during cocoa roasting and chocolate conching. Int J Food Microbiol 159:225–9.
  • Rajkowski KT. (2012). Thermal inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella on catfish and tilapia. Food Microbiol 30:427–31.
  • Beuchat LR, Manna DA. (2011). Inactivation of Salmonella on pecan nutmeats by hot air treatment and oil roasting. J Food Protect 74:1441–50.
  • Bari ML, Nei D, Sotome I, et al. (2010). Effectiveness of superheated steam and gas catalytic infrared heat treatments to inactivate Salmonella on raw almonds. Foodborne Pathog Dis 7:845–50.
  • Du WX, Abd SJ, McCarthy KL, Harris LJ. (2010). Reduction of Salmonella on inoculated almonds exposed to hot oil. J Food Protect 73:1238–46.
  • Bingol G, Yang JH, Brandl MT, et al. (2011). Infrared pasteurization of raw almonds. J Food Eng 104:387–93.
  • Li R, Kou X, Cheng T, et al. (2017). Verification of radio frequency pasteurization process for in-shell almonds. J Food Eng 192:103–10.
  • Kim SY, Sagong HG, Choi SH, et al. (2012). Radio-frequency heating to inactivate Salmonella Typhimurium and Escherichia coli O157:H7 on black and red pepper spice. Int J Food Microbiol 153:171–5.
  • Sung H-J, Kang D-H. (2014). Effect of a 915 MHz microwave system on inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella Typhimurium, and Listeria monocytogenes in salsa. LWT – Food Sci Technol 59:754–9.
  • Lee SY, Sagong HG, Ryu S, Kang DH. (2012). Effect of continuous ohmic heating to inactivate Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella Typhimurium and Listeria monocytogenes in orange juice and tomato juice. J Appl Microbiol 112:723–31.
  • Villa-Rojas R, Tang J, Wang S, et al. (2013). Thermal inactivation of Salmonella enteritidis PT 30 in almond kernels as influenced by water activity. J Food Protect 76:26–32.
  • Juneja VK, Friedman M. (2008). Carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde facilitate thermal destruction of Escherichia coli O157: H7 in raw ground beef. J Food Protect 71:1604–11.
  • Juneja VK, Novak JS. (2003). Heat resistance of Escherichia coli O157: H7 in cook-in-bag ground beef as affected by pH and acidulant. Int J Food Sci Technol 38:297–304.
  • Juneja VK, Marks HM, Mohr T. (2003). Predictive thermal inactivation model for effects of temperature, sodium lactate, NaCl, and sodium pyrophosphate on Salmonella serotypes in ground beef. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:5138–56.
  • Juneja VK, Cadavez V, Gonzales-Barron U, Mukhopadhyay S. (2015). Modelling the effect of pH, sodium chloride and sodium pyrophosphate on the thermal resistance of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef. Food Res Int 69:289–304.
  • Ohara MD, Xiong QB, Boyer JW, Leeper DB. (1992). Intrinsic thermal response, thermotolerance development and stepdown heating in murine bone marrow progenitor cells. Int J Hyperther 8:451–61.
  • Lepock JR. (2005). How do cells respond to their thermal environment. Int J Hyperther 21:681–7.
  • Moussa M, Goldberg SN, Kumar G, et al. (2016). Effect of thermal dose on heat shock protein expression after radio-frequency ablation with and without adjuvant nanoparticle chemotherapies. Int J Hyperther 32:829–41.
  • Bermúdez-Aguirre D, Corradini MG. (2012). Inactivation kinetics of Salmonella spp. under thermal and emerging treatments: a review. Food Res Int 45:700–12.
  • Juneja VK, Garcia-Davila J, Lopez-Romero JC, et al. (2014). Modeling the effects of temperature, sodium chloride, and green tea and their interactions on the thermal inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes in Turkey. J Food Protect 77:1696–702.
  • Juneja V, Mukhopadhyay S, Marks H, et al. (2014). Predictive thermal inactivation model for effects and interactions of temperature, NaCl, sodium pyrophosphate, and sodium lactate on Listeria monocytogenes in ground beef. Food Bioprocess Technol 7:437–46.
  • Juneja VK, Altuntas EG, Ayhan K, et al. (2013). Predictive model for the reduction of heat resistance of Listeria monocytogenes in ground beef by the combined effect of sodium chloride and apple polyphenols. Int J Food Microbiol 164:54–9.
  • Jordan JS, Gurtler JB, Marks HM, et al. (2011). A mathematical model of inactivation kinetics for a four-strain composite of Salmonella Enteritidis and Oranienburg in commercial liquid egg yolk. Food Microbiol 28:67–75.
  • Juneja VK, Gonzales-Barron U, Butler F, et al. (2013). Predictive thermal inactivation model for the combined effect of temperature, cinnamaldehyde and carvacrol on starvation-stressed multiple Salmonella serotypes in ground chicken. Int J Food Microbiol 165:184–99.
  • Pradhan A, Li M, Li Y, et al. (2012). A modified Weibull model for growth and survival of Listeria innocua and Salmonella Typhimurium in chicken breasts during refrigerated and frozen storage. Poultry Sci 91:1482–8.
  • Nagelkerke NJD. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika Trust 78:691–2.
  • Huang K, Tian H, Gai L, Wang J. (2012). A review of kinetic models for inactivating microorganisms and enzymes by pulsed electric field processing. J Food Eng 111:191–207.
  • Baranyi J, Pin C, Ross T. (1999). Validating and comparing predictive models. Int J Food Microbiol 48:159–66.
  • Ross T. (1996). Indices for performance evaluation of predictive models in food microbiology. J Appl Bacteriol 81:501–8.
  • Augustin JC, Carlier V, Rozier J. (1998). Mathematical modelling of the heat resistance of Listeria monocytogenes. J Appl Microbiol 84:185–91.
  • Humpheson L, Adams MR, Anderson WA, Cole MB. (1998). Biphasic thermal inactivation kinetics in Salmonella enteritidis PT4. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:459–64.
  • Cole MB, Davies KW, Munro G, et al. (1993). A Vitalistic model to describe the thermal inactivation of Listeria-Monocytogenes. J Ind Microbiol 12:232–9.
  • Mattick KL, Jorgensen F, Wang P, et al. (2001). Effect of challenge temperature and solute type on heat tolerance of Salmonella serovars at low water activity. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4128–36.
  • Boutibonnes P, Giard JC, Hartke A, et al. (1993). Characterization of the heat-shock response in Enterococcus-Faecalis. Anton Leeuw J Microbiol 64:47–55.
  • Lee SY, Kang DH. (2009). Combined effects of heat, acetic acid, and salt for inactivating Escherichia coli O157:H7 in laboratory media. Food Control 20:1006–12.
  • Fujikawa H, Morozumi S, Smerage GH, Teixeira AA. (2000). Comparison of capillary and test tube procedures for analysis of thermal inactivation kinetics of mold spores. J Food Protect 63:1404–9.
  • Whiting R, Golden M. (2002). Variation among Escherichia coli O157: H7 strains relative to their growth, survival, thermal inactivation, and toxin production in broth. Int J Food Microbiol 75:127–33.
  • Gabriel AA, Nakano H. (2011). Effects of culture conditions on the subsequent heat inactivation of E. coli O157:H7 in apple juice. Food Control 22:1456–60.
  • Huemer IA, Klijn N, Vogelsang HWJ, Langeveld LPM. (1998). Thermal death kinetics of spores of Bacillus sporothermodurans isolated from UHT milk. Int Dairy J 8:851–5.
  • Odlaug TE, Pflug IJ. (1977). Thermal destruction of Clostridium botulinum spores suspended in tomato juice in aluminum thermal death time tubes. Appl Environ Microbiol 34:23–9.
  • Chung HJ, Wang S, Tang J. (2007). Influence of heat transfer with tube methods on measured thermal inactivation parameters for Escherichia coli. J Food Protect 70:851–9.
  • Yuk HG, Geveke DJ, Zhang HQ, Jin TZ. (2009). Comparison of aluminum thermal-death-time disks with a pilot-scale pasteurizer on the thermal inactivation of Escherichia coli K12 in apple cider. Food Control 20:1053–7.
  • Chung HJ, Birla SL, Tang J. (2008). Performance evaluation of aluminum test cell designed for determining the heat resistance of bacterial spores in foods. LWT-Food Sci Technol 41:1351–9.
  • Jin T, Zhang H, Boyd G, Tang J. (2008). Thermal resistance of Salmonella enteritidis and Escherichia coli K12 in liquid egg determined by thermal-death-time disks. J Food Eng 84:608–14.
  • Buchner C, Thomas S, Jaros D, Rohm H. (2012). Fast-responding thermal-death-time tubes for the determination of thermal bacteria inactivation. Eng Life Sci 12:109–12.
  • Osaili TM, Al-Nabulsi AA, Shaker RR, et al. (2013). Thermal inactivation of Salmonella Typhimurium in chicken shawirma (gyro). Int J Food Microbiol 166:15–20.
  • Li C, Huang L, Chen J. (2014). Comparative study of thermal inactivation kinetics of Salmonella spp. in peanut butter and peanut butter spread. Food Control 45:143–9.
  • Takhar PS, Head KL, Hendrix KM, Smith DM. (2009). Predictive modeling of Salmonella species inactivation in ground pork and turkey during cooking. Int J Food Eng 5:1–18.
  • Harris LJ, Uesugi AR, Abd SJ, McCarthy KL. (2012). Survival of Salmonella Enteritidis PT 30 on inoculated almond kernels in hot water treatments. Food Res Int 45:1093–8.
  • Jeong SG, Kang DH. (2014). Influence of moisture content on inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in powdered red and black pepper spices by radio-frequency heating. Int J Food Microbiol 176:15–22.
  • Izurieta WP, Komitopoulou E. (2012). Effect of moisture on Salmonella spp. heat resistance in cocoa and hazelnut shells. Food Res Int 45:1087–92.
  • Al-holy M, Quinde Z, Guan D, et al. (2004). Inactivation of Listeria innocua in nisin-treated salmon and sturgeon caviar heated by radio frequency. J Food Protect 67:1848–54.
  • Gurtler J, Zhang H, Zhang L, et al. (2008). Evaluation of glass capillary tube and TDT disk methods for determining thermal inactivation kinetics of Salmonella in liquid whole egg. International Association for Food Protection, 95th Annual Meeting; Columbus.
  • Basaran-Akgul N. (2013). Comparative study of thermal kinetics for clostridium sporogenes PA 3679 inactivation using glass capillary tube and aluminum tube methods in carrot juice and phosphate buffer. J Pure Appl Microbiol 7:117–24.
  • Stephens PJ, Cole MB, Jones MV. (1994). Effect of heating rate on the thermal inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes. J Appl Bacteriol 77:702–8.
  • Foster AM, Ketteringham LP, Purnell GL, et al. (2006). New apparatus to provide repeatable surface temperature–time treatments on inoculated food samples. J Food Eng 76:19–26.
  • Gil MM, Pereira PM, Brandao TR, et al. (2006). Integrated approach on heat transfer and inactivation kinetics of microorganisms on the surface of foods during heat treatments—software development. J Food Eng 76:95–103.
  • James S, Evans J. (2006). Predicting the reduction in microbes on the surface of foods during surface pasteurisation—the ‘BUGDEATH’ project. J Food Eng 76:1–6.
  • Kou XX, Li R, Hou LX, et al. (2016). Performance of a heating block system designed for studying the heat resistance of bacteria in foods. Sci Rep 6:30758.
  • Yang J, Bingol G, Pan Z, et al. (2010). Infrared heating for dry-roasting and pasteurization of almonds. J Food Eng 101:273–80.
  • Sun Y, Laird DT, Shieh YC. (2012). Temperature-dependent survival of hepatitis a virus during storage of contaminated onions. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4976–83.
  • Torok T, King JAD. (1991). Thermal inactivation kinetics of food-borne yeasts. J Food Sci 56:6–9.
  • Chen GB, Campanella OH, Corvalan CM, Haley TA. (2008). On-line correction of process temperature deviations in continuous retorts. J Food Eng 84:258–69.
  • Peleg M. (2006). Advanced quantitative microbiology for foods and biosystems: models for predicting growth and inactivation. Boca Raton (FL): CRC.
  • Borrelli MJ, Thompson LL, Cain CA, Dewey WC. (1990). Time-temperature analysis of cell killing of BHK cells heated at temperatures in the range of 43.5 °C to 57.0 °C. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 19:389–99.
  • Corradini MG, Peleg M. (2009). Dynamic model of heat inactivation kinetics for bacterial adaptation. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2590–7.
  • Kamau D, Doores S, Pruitt K. (1990). Enhanced thermal destruction of Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus by the lactoperoxidase system. Appl Environ Microbiol 56:2711–6.
  • Cerf O. (1977). Tailing of survival curves of bacterial spores. J Appl Bacteriol 42:1–9.
  • Archer J, Jervis ET, Bird J, Gaze JE. (1998). Heat resistance of Salmonella weltevreden in low-moisture environments. J Food Protect 61:969–73.
  • Shachar D, Yaron S. (2006). Heat tolerance of Salmonella enterica serovars Agona, Enteritidis, and Typhimurium in peanut butter. J Food Protect 69:2687–91.
  • Ma L, Zhang GD, Gerner-Smidt P, et al. (2009). Thermal inactivation of Salmonella in peanut butter. J Food Protect 72:1596–601.
  • Tomlins RL, Ordal ZJ. (1976). Thermal injury and inactivation in vegetative bacteria. In: Skinner FA, Hugo WB, eds. Inhibition and inactivation of vegetative microbes. New York: Academic Press, 153.
  • Juneja VK. (2003). Predictive model for the combined effect of temperature, sodium lactate, and sodium diacetate on the heat resistance of Listeria monocytogenes in beef. J Food Protect 66:804–11.
  • Juneja VK, Eblen BS. (1999). Predictive thermal inactivation model for Listeria monocytogenes with temperature, pH, NaCl, and sodium pyrophosphate as controlling factors. J Food Protect 62:986–93.
  • Juneja VK, Marmer BS, Eblen BS. (1999). Predictive model for the combined effect of temperature, pH, sodium chloride, and sodium pyrophosphate on the heat resistance of Escherichia coli O157: H7. J Food Saf 19:147–60.
  • Lopez S, Prieto M, Dijkstra J, et al. (2004). Statistical evaluation of mathematical models for microbial growth. Int J Food Microbiol 96:289–300.
  • Mafart P, Couvert O, Gaillard S, Leguerinel I. (2002). On calculating sterility in thermal preservation methods: application of the Weibull frequency distribution model. Int J Food Microbiol 72:107–13.
  • Martinus AJS, Boekel V. (2002). On the use of the Weibull model to describe thermal inactivation of microbial vegetative cells. Int J Food Microbiol 74:139–59.
  • Rodrigues D, Banobre-Lopez M, Espina B, et al. (2013). Effect of magnetic hyperthermia on the structure of biofilm and cellular viability of a food spoilage bacterium. Biofouling 29:1225–32.
  • Banobre-Lopez M, Rodrigues D, Espina B, et al. (2013). Control of bacterial cells growths by magnetic hyperthermia. IEEE Trans Magn 49:3508–11.
  • Valdramidis VP, Geeraerd AH, Tiwari BK, et al. (2011). Estimating the efficacy of mild heating processes taking into account microbial non-linearities: a case study on the thermisation of a food simulant. Food Control 22:137–42.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.