740
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Provision of data from the clinical database and of biological material from the tumor bank of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 2008–2017

, , , , ORCID Icon, , & show all

Introduction

The capability to link health care information across various health care providers (institutions, clinics and professions) is increasingly recognized as an important source for clinical decision making and improved patient care [Citation1]. A multi-institutional and -disciplinary records linkage system will potentially make information on treatments and events available to treating physicians and reduce repeat testing [Citation2]. A comprehensive linkage of medical records also allows to access patient outcomes individually and for quality assurance and research if applied to a sufficiently large group over extended time. A clinical database becomes particularly informative if it is population-based, e.g., covers all residents in a well-defined area. The ability to improve quality of care will further increase when data in multiple databases can be coupled on an individual patient level, and in Denmark this is enabled by the unique civic registration number assigned to all inhabitants. Finally, the research opportunities will expand considerably by access to tumor tissue if linked to clinical data.

The clinical database of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) was established in 1977 in conjunction with the foundation of the multidisciplinary group [Citation3]. Since then relevant data of diagnostic aspects, of loco-regional and systemic therapies and follow-up has been collected nationwide by the DBCG from all women newly diagnosed in Denmark with breast cancer [Citation4]. The clinical database has collected data from about 130,000 breast cancer cases and the database has provided an instrument for monitoring community breast cancer standards and for the conduct of large series of randomized trials [Citation5], and data from these trials have successively modified the current guidelines. These initiatives have significantly contributed to an improvement in the prognosis of breast cancer [Citation6,Citation7].

This paper will provide information on how data from the clinical database and of how biological material from the DBCG tumor bank has been utilized for correlative research studies.

The DBCG clinical database and access to the data

All Danish units involved in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of breast cancer patients have contributed to the database in reporting data of histopathology, treatment, and follow-up [Citation8]. Data from a total number of about 130,000 women have now been reported . A total of about 30,000 patients are currently in treatment or in follow-up, and 65,000 are still alive. Early on the data was reported by paper forms to the secretariat with subsequent transfer of data to the database, but from 2007 a web system was developed to enable on-line reporting from the departments.

From 2006 data concerning demographics, diagnostics, surgery, and oncologic treatment strategies, defined as quality data, have been extracted from the database to be used for the DBCG quality indicators [www.dbcg.dk/kvalitetsdatabase] according to the program of the Danish Clinical Registries (RKKP) [www.rkkp.dk].

The data of the database are unique. They are individual based, and longitudinal with successive dates of therapeutic interventions and events. And the database, following improvement over time, is now close to have a complete coverage of the Danish breast cancer population. This has been achieved by the development of an effective system of reminders, based partly on identification of gabs in the reporting and by linkage to the Danish Pathology Registry, which registers data from every pathology report performed by the Danish departments of pathology. Thus patients not registered from the departments can be identified and enquiries sent to the departments. And finally, the database is constructed to give advice to the clinicians, based on the reported data of the clinical, histopathological and genetic characteristics about the recommended oncological treatment according to current evidence based guidelines.

In addition link to other public registries by use of the unique 10-digit Danish Civil Registration Number (CPR), assigned to all Danish residents, offers an excellent possibility to run comparative research studies such as link to The Danish National Board of Health Registry (LPR) which registers all diagnoses from admission to hospital, such as other diseases, co-morbidity and long-term adverse events, link to the Danish National Prescription Registry which registers drugs prescribed, link to the Cancer Registry for other malignant diseases and link to the CPR for vital status.

Access of data from the database to be used for research by members of the DBCG-organization or by other groups or institutions with expertise in breast cancer research required an application sent to the DBCG secretariat and to be evaluated by members of the DBCG executive committee, possibly following advice from one of the relevant scientific committees [Citation3]. The applications are approved provided certain scientific criteria, if necessary following correspondence with the applicant, and current legal requirements are met.

The DBCG tumor bank and access to biological material

The biological material from Danish breast cancer patients is stored at three locations. In the departments of pathology responsible for the diagnostic procedures as well as the molecular biological analyses required for allocation of the patient to the proper treatment. The material is stored as paraffin-embedded tissue, fresh frozen tissue and to a lesser extent extracted RNA/DNA. Since 2009 all Danish cancer patients have been asked for permission to collect biological material including paraffin embedded tissue and fresh frozen tissue, when available, as well as a blood sample to the Danish Cancer Biobank [www.cancerbiobank.dk]. Finally in the DBCG tumor bank, which was established in 1991, in connection with the initiation of the centralized biochemical ER analysis. Since then the DBCG tumor bank has stored biological material as paraffin-embedded tissue, fresh frozen tissue and extracted RNA/DNA, and excess TMA’s collected in relation to translational research projects.

Access to biological material requires approval of the project by the DBCG executive committee as described for access to clinical data complemented by a Material Transfer Agreement signed by the medical leader of the DBCG secretariat and the chairman of the project in question. If the material is used to produce TMA’s the residuals are to be returned to the DBCG tumor bank while residual RNA/DNA can be stored with the pathologist responsible for the specific study. The residual TMA’s or RNA/DNA is registered for potential future studies.

Requests for access to data from the clinical database

Since the establishment of the database DBCG has received 350 requests for extracts from the database to be used in research studies. This analysis covers the time since January 2008 during that period DBCG received 167 requests. These are summarized in Supplementary Table 1. Applications concerning update of previously accepted studies are not included in the table. As it appears the topics cover almost all aspects of breast cancer: diagnostic aspects, including mammography, histopathology including potential prognostic and predictive factors, surgery, radiotherapy, systemic therapy, epidemiology, adverse events, importance of concomitant drug administration, genetics, and rehabilitation.

Since mid-2013, we prospectively recorded certain characteristics of the research projects (n = 82). During this period 16 of the studies was run as single institution studies but 64 (78%) were multicenter or nation-wide studies. In 24 of the cases the requested data included quality data only, but the majority of cases (70%) requested additional data from the database. Access to biological material, this was requested in 13 (=16%) of the applications.

Publications from these studies are included in the DBCG bibliography which as of ultimo 2016 counts 452 peer reviewed publications [www.dbcg.dk/publications].

Discussion

The data presented demonstrate how a well-organized clinical database in conjunction with a multidisciplinary organization can be efficiently utilized to answer a large variety of research questions related to the total course of the disease.

Several factors have probably been important in making the clinical database of the DBCG a major research resource. First, for 40 years DBCG has provided easily accessible application forms and guidelines for requesting data and the board of directors, the responsible authority, is appointed by the scientific societies. Second, the clinical database contains four decades of comprehensive and population-based data on breast cancer patients in Denmark. Third, linkage to information from a variety of other database has been possible on an individual patient basis. Finally, tumor-tissue has been available on around 80% of patients enabling biological research.

Supplemental material

Henning_Mouridsen_et_al._Supplementary_Tabel1.docx

Download MS Word (29.5 KB)

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  • Visvanathan K, Levit LA, Raghaven D, et al. Unlapped potential of observational research to inform clinical decision making: American Society of Clinical Research Statement. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:1845–1854.
  • Sauver JL, Grossardt BR, Yawn BP, et al. Use of medical records linkage system to enumerate dynamic population over time: the rochester epidemiology project. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173:1059–1068.
  • Blichert-Toft M, Christiansen P, Mouridsen HT. Danish Breast cancer Cooperative Group – DBCG: history, organization, and status of scientific achievements at 30-year anniversary. Acta Oncol. 2008;47:497–505.
  • Møller S, Jensen MB, Ejlertsen B, et al. The clinical database and the treatment guidelines of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DCG); its 30-years anniversary and future promise. Acta Oncol. 2008;47:506–525.
  • Ejlertsen B, Offersen B, Jensen MB, et al. Forty years of landmark trials undertaken by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) nationwide or in international collaboration. Acta Oncol. 2018; in press.
  • Mouridsen H, Bjerre KD, Christiansen P, et al. Improvement of the prognosis in breast cancer in Denmark 1977–2006, based on the nationwide reporting to the DBCG Registry. Acta Oncol. 2008;47:525–537.
  • Jensen MB, Ejlertsen B, Mouridsen H, for the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, et al. Improvements in breast cancer survival between 1995 and 2012 in Denmark: the importance of earlier diagnosis and adjuvant treatment. Acta Oncol. 2016;55:24–25.
  • Jensen MB, Laenkholm AV, Kroman N, et al. The clinical database and implementation of treatment guidelines by the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group in 2007-2016. Acta Oncol. 2018; in press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.