Abstract
Purpose
To culturally adapt and examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese (Cantonese) version of SATIS-Stroke (C-SATIS-Stroke) in people with chronic stroke.
Materials and methods
Forward and backward translations were performed in accordance with available guidelines. We administered the C-SATIS-Stroke to 101 people with stroke and 50 healthy older adults. We assessed the test–retest and internal reliability, measurement error, known-group validity, correlations with other outcome measures, optimal cut-off score and ceiling and floor effects.
Results
C-SATIS-Stroke demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.959) and good test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient3,1 = 0.913). Compared with healthy controls, people with chronic stroke had lower C-SATIS-Stroke scores. The mean C-SATIS-Stroke score was significantly correlated with the mean scores of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Stroke Impact Scale, Community Integration Measure and Survey of Activities and Fear of Falling in the Elderly. The cut-off score to distinguish the levels of satisfaction with activity and participation between people with chronic stroke and healthy older adults was 80 out of 108 (sensitivity: 77%; specificity: 72%). C-SATIS-Stroke exhibited ceiling effects but not floor effects.
Conclusions
C-SATIS-Stroke is a reliable and valid measure for assessing satisfaction with social participation among Chinese people with chronic stroke.
Satisfactory semantic, idiomatic, cultural, and conceptual equivalence of the C-SATIS-Stroke are in line with those of the original English version of the SATIS-Stroke
Excellent reliability and validity of the C-SATIS-Stroke are also in line with those of the original English version of the SATIS-Stroke
The C-SATIS-Stroke can be used to assess the subjective satisfaction feeling in terms of social participation among Chinese people with chronic stroke
IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all the subjects for their support and participation.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was obtained from the Departmental Research Committee of the Hong. Kong Polytechnic University (Approval number: HSEARS20210110002).
Author contributions
S.S.M.N. conceived the original idea and T.W.L. planned the experiments. H.P., J.T., S.S.L.L., C.S.K.L., C.C.C.C., and C.Y.Y.L. carried out the experiments, performed the analytic calculations and S.S.M.N. and T.W.L.W supervised the project. H.P. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.
Disclosure statement
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest regarding the research, authorship, and publication of this article.