Testing the psychometric properties of the Chinese (Cantonese) version of SATIS-Stroke in people with chronic stroke

References

• Campbell BCV, Khatri P. Stroke. Lancet. 2020;396(10244):129–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevick LK, Ghali S, Hill MD, et al. Systematic review of the cost and cost-effectiveness of rapid endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2017;48(9):2519–2526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, et al. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(11):CD010820.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pereira GS, Corrêa FI, Júlio CE, et al. Clinimetric properties of the SATIS-Stroke questionnaire in the Brazilian population: a satisfaction assessment measure addressing activities and participation after a stroke. Braz J Phys Ther. 2021;25(6):719–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veerbeek JM, Kwakkel G, van Wegen EE, et al. Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review. Stroke. 2011;42(5):1482–1488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu TW, Ng SS, Ng GY. Translation and initial validation of the Chinese (Cantonese) version of community integration measure for use in patients with chronic stroke. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:623836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira GS, Silva SM, Júlio CE, et al. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of SATIS-Stroke for use in Brazil: a satisfaction measure of activities and participation in stroke survivors. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:8054640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauch A, Cieza A, Stucki G. How to apply the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) for rehabilitation management in clinical practice. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44(3):329–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse T, Douglas J, Lentin P, et al. Measuring participation after stroke: a review of frequently used tools. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(1):177–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kossi O, Amanzonwe ER, Thonnard JL, et al. Applicability of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-based participation measures in stroke survivors in Africa: a systematic review. Int J Rehabil Res. 2020;43(1):3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffioulx E, Arnould C, Vandervelde L, et al. Changes in satisfaction with activities and participation between acute, post-acute and chronic stroke phases: a responsiveness study of the SATIS-Stroke questionnaire. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(10):944–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffioulx E, Arnould C, Thonnard JL. SATIS-Stroke: a satisfaction measure of activities and participation in the actual environment experienced by patients with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(10):836–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffioulx E. Satisfaction with activity and participation in patients with stroke [dissertation]. Prom: Universtity of Groningen; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, et al. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. Int J Nurs Stud. 2011;48(6):661–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for comparing two alpha coefficients. Appl Psychol Measure. 2003;27(1):72–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bujang MA, Omar ED, Baharum NA. A review on sample size determination for Cronbach’s alpha test: a simple guide for researchers. Malays J Med Sci. 2018;25(6):85–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Warner TT, et al. What sample sizes for reliability and validity studies in neurology? J Neurol. 2012;259(12):2681–2694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arafat SY, Chowdhury HR, Qusar M, et al. Cross cultural adaptation & psychometric validation of research instruments: a methodological review. J Behav Health. 2016;5(3):129–136.
   Google Scholar
• Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;16(3):232–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther. 1983;63(10):1606–1610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mong Y, Teo TW, Ng SS. 5-Repetition sit-to-stand test in subjects with chronic stroke: reliability and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(3):407–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW. The timed up & go test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(8):1641–1647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macchiavelli A, Giffone A, Ferrarello F, et al. Reliability of the six-minute walk test in individuals with stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2021;42(1):81–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Drutz C, Kumar R, et al. Use of the six-minute walk test poststroke: is there a practice effect? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(9):1686–1692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards DF, Lang CE, Wagner JM, et al. An evaluation of the wolf motor function test in motor trials early after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(4):660–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris DM, Uswatte G, Crago JE, et al. The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(6):750–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiengkaew V, Jitaree K, Chaiyawat P. Minimal detectable changes of the berg balance scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale, timed "up & go" test, gait speeds, and 2-minute walk test in individuals with chronic stroke with different degrees of ankle plantarflexor tone. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(7):1201–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak MK, Lau AL, Law FS, et al. Validation of the Chinese translated activities-specific balance confidence scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(4):496–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botner EM, Miller WC, Eng JJ. Measurement properties of the activities-specific balance confidence scale among individuals with stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(4):156–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachman ME, Howland J, Tennstedt S, et al. Fear of falling and activity restriction: the survey of activities and fear of falling in the elderly (safe). J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1998;53(1):P43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou KL, Yeung FK, Wong EC. Fear of falling and depressive symptoms in chinese elderly living in nursing homes: fall efficacy and activity level as mediator or moderator? Aging Ment Health. 2005;9(3):255–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornyak V, Brach JS, Wert DM, et al. What is the relation between fear of falling and physical activity in older adults? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(12):2529–2534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellone E, Savini S, Fida R, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015;30(3):229–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, et al. The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2131–2140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. London: Pearsons; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Stratford PW. Estimating the standard error of measurement from reliability studies. Physiother Can. 2004;56(1):27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA. Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2006;86(5):735–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline P. The handbook of psychological testing. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Ng SSM, Liu TW, Tsoh J, et al. Psychometric properties of the trail walking test for people with stroke. Front Neurol. 2022;13:821670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouffioulx E, Arnould C, Thonnard JL. Satisfaction with activity and participation and its relationships with body functions, activities, or environmental factors in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(9):1404–1410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K, Wood-Dauphine S, Williams J, et al. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada. 1989;41(6):304–311.
   Google Scholar
• Liu TW, Ng SSM. The reliability and validity of the survey of activities and fear of falling in the elderly for assessing fear and activity avoidance among stroke survivors. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0214796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder M, Nijland R. Stroke impact scale. J Physiother. 2016;62(2):117. ):
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin KC, Fu T, Wu CY, et al. Psychometric comparisons of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 and stroke-specific quality of life scale. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(3):435–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen JW, Ivanova TD, Brouwer B, et al. Do performance measures of strength, balance, and mobility predict quality of life and community reintegration after stroke? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99(4):713–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria-Fortini I, Basílio ML, Scianni AA, et al. Performance and capacity-based measures of locomotion, compared to impairment-based measures, best predicted participation in individuals with hemiparesis due to stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(15):1791–1798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamit T, Maeir A, Ben Assayag E, et al. Impact of first-ever mild stroke on participation at 3 and 6 month post-event: the Tabasco study. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(8):667–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar