What Factors Drive School Districts to Adopt Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK): Evidence from Wisconsin

ABSTRACT

Research Findings: This study proposes and tests hypotheses regarding the factors in public early-childhood education (ECE) policy that may explain local universal pre-kindergarten (UPK) policies. By analyzing district-level longitudinal data from the Wisconsin State Department and United States (U.S.) Census over two decades, the study examines the contextual factors associated with policy adoption. Among the three frames of ECE policy – social welfare, education, and family services – this study finds that the education frame, which emphasizes the goal of public ECE in improving all students’ educational outcomes, is the primary motivation for UPK in Wisconsin. The social-welfare frame, which posits that public ECE supports poor families, also appears to be associated with Wisconsin UPK policies. Additionally, the results show that UPK was not introduced to provide more child care for working parents, indicating that the family-service frame does not explain UPK. Practice or Policy: Given the overlapping roles of public ECE policies, this study demonstrates that UPK has primarily been oriented toward educational objectives and provides insights for policymakers in deciding which policy to adopt based on local needs.

Acknowledgement

The author thanks Amy Claessens for her comments on an earlier version of this manuscript and her thoughtful advice during my pursuit of a Ph.D. degree. This work was developed from a part of the author's dissertation thesis titled ”Early Childhood Education in Public Education – Motivation, Workforce, and Effects.” This research was supported by a grant from the American Educational Research Association, which receives funds for its ”AERA-NSF Grants Program” from the National Science Foundation under NSF award number NSF-DRL #1749275. The funders were not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, in writing this article, or in the decision to submit it for publication.

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).