341
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Exploring UK foundation doctors’ perceptions surrounding raising concerns in the workplace

ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 513-527 | Received 17 Jan 2020, Accepted 26 Jun 2020, Published online: 07 Jul 2020
 

ABSTRACT

This study aims to explore the perceptions of foundation doctors (FDs) in the United Kingdom (UK) surrounding raising concerns in the workplace. An online survey was sent to all FDs in the UK between February and March 2018. Respondents were asked what they had observed or experienced that had been ethically challenging during their foundation training. The qualitative responses were coded into themes. Reasons why FDs wished to raise concerns in the workplace included disagreements about clinical decisions within the team, insufficient availability of resources, lack of senior colleague support and having to work beyond their competencies. Challenges faced by FDs when raising concerns included organisational resistance to change, difficulties in communicating ideas to those higher up in the hierarchy and the emotional stress of whistleblowing regarding senior colleagues. Perceived consequences of raising concerns included negative impact on FDs’ reputation and career, and fear of bullying. To overcome these barriers, changes within organisations at all levels must take place in order to provide an environment where FDs are encouraged to raise concerns and thus make positive changes to their work environments for themselves, their colleagues and patients.

Acknowledgments

We wish to express our sincere gratitude to the Institute of Medical Ethics (UK) who provided funding for the online survey tool. We are also grateful to the time and support from colleagues within the UK FPO, GMC, HEE and BMA who offered feedback and guidance on the study design, content of the survey, and recruitment. However, the views and opinions expressed in this paper are the authors’ own, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the people we acknowledge here.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 337.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.