154
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Report

Adherence and satisfaction in Argus II prosthesis users: a self determination theory model

, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 462-469 | Received 20 Mar 2021, Accepted 26 Feb 2022, Published online: 16 Mar 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Background

Self-determination theory (SDT) of human motivation was used to examine associations between different forms of motivation in Argus II retinal prosthesis users and their engagement and satisfaction with the Argus device.

Materials and Methods

Nine subjects were administered: 1) a Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS) questionnaire to measure intrinsic motivation, identified regulation, external regulation, and amotivation, and 2) the Argus questionnaire (AQ) which was organized into 5 categories to measure ‘Decision to get an Argus implant,’ ’Self-perception as an Argus user’, ‘Utility of Argus,’ ‘Perceived competence,’ and ‘Family support.’ Spearman correlations (rs) were used to find associations between measures from SIMS and AQ.

Results

Nine subjects completed both questionnaires. Statistically significant associations were observed between identified regulation and AQ items from categories: Decision to get Argus, Self-perception, Utility of Argus, and Perceived competence; and between intrinsic motivation and AQ items from Self-perception and Utility. External regulation was negatively associated with Family support, and amotivation was associated with one item from Self-perception. Engagement with the device and satisfaction were associated to both identified regulation and intrinsic motivation. There was no significant relationship between external regulation and adherence to the device.

Conclusions

The SDT model can be used to investigate the types of motivation that influence uptake and engagement of the Argus device. Clinicians can use this knowledge to improve outcomes by supporting confidence in users and by encouraging them to maintain internalization and continued commitment to adherence.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Leslie Niziol for support with data analysis.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on the publisher’s website.

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 691.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.