890
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Advances in prognostic biomarkers for esophageal cancer

, , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 109-119 | Received 07 Oct 2018, Accepted 21 Dec 2018, Published online: 30 Dec 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the deadliest neoplasms in Asian countries. The high mortality rate and low survival rate of this disease are the major challenges for patients. Therefore, exploring novel biomarkers for prognosis analysis is still an important task for cancer research.

Areas covered: The aim of our review is to summarize the recent advances in prognostic markers for EC. We also discuss the pros and cons of different types of biomarkers for improving the judgment of prognosis. These biomarkers mainly include liquid biopsy, genomics biomarkers, and proteomic molecules. In this sense, we found that liquid biopsies, especially circulating tumor cells, should be fully considered in clinical practice, as they show high specificity and accuracy. Proteomic biomarkers also show potential value, but the costs of associated techniques may be expensive for routine use. Alternatively, epigenetic markers (such as miRNAs) appear to be very promising since they can be easily detected in both tissues and bodily fluids.

Expert commentary: So far, the defined and available biomarkers for prognosis judgment of EC are insufficient. Future studies and clinical trials should be carried out to improve the clinical use of the biomarkers discussed here.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewers disclosure

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial relationships or otherwise to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This study was supported in part by grant from the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China [grant number 81171923], grant from the State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology [grant number CBSKL2014Z13], and grant from the National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases [grant number 2015BAI13B07].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 706.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.