237
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Evaluation and Innovations

Is there a role for GPs in teaching neurology to medical students? A qualitative evaluation

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 110-116 | Received 11 Aug 2018, Accepted 04 Jan 2019, Published online: 20 Jan 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether GPs can support medical students in learning basic neurology in the context of a traditional hospital neurology attachment.

Method: This was a qualitative evaluation using routinely collected data from stakeholders, consisting of qualitative data in the form of student evaluation questionnaires, course documentation and correspondence from faculty staff.

Results: The addition of GP teaching to the programme increased availability of patients with neurological problems accessible to students and provided a safe, supportive environment for students to learn their fundamental clinical skills. Students gained valuable insights into the impact of neurological disease from the perspective of patients, their families and carers. GP teaching of neurology was well regarded by students. Some GP tutors felt they lacked adequate experience to teach more technical aspects of neurology, and some students shared this concern. Concepts of professional boundaries between generalists and specialists were not observed, but GP teaching was perceived to be ‘other’ or outside normal medical school activity.

Conclusions: General practitioners can successfully facilitate students’ access to patients with neurological disease and employ their generalist to enhance neurological learning. Some GPs were initially uncomfortable with teaching skills such as detailed neurological physical examination.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the GP tutors, neurology specialist colleagues, students and patients who took part in this teaching programme and contributed to its evaluation. Also, thanks to MB BS curriculum leads for agreeing to this course development.

Ethical approval

UCL ethics committee (4481/001) approved the use of anonymised feedback without consent and identifiable data with consent.

Disclosure statement

MJ, JR and MG were all employed by UCL to deliver this course. The course no longer runs so there are no longer any competing interests.

Additional information

Funding

None.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 200.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.