Intrapartum beta-lactam antibiotics for preventing group B streptococcal early-onset disease: can we abandon the concept of ‘inadequate’ intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis?

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Neonatal sepsis remains a serious and potentially fatal illness. Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) prevents group B streptococcal (GBS) early-onset sepsis. The optimal duration of IAP (adequate IAP) to reduce vertical transmission of GBS has been debated. Understanding the mechanism of action of IAP may help in minimizing neonatal evaluation and unnecessary antibiotic use.

Areas covered: In recent years, several studies on pharmacokinetics and clinical use of IAP have been published. Although penicillin and ampicillin are the most preferred antibiotics, the clinical efficacy of non-beta-lactam antibiotics, including clindamycin and vancomycin, used in cases of penicillin anaphylaxis-associated allergy, remains debatable. This is a narrative review of the literature regarding the impact of ‘inadequate’ IAP on the clinical management of women and newborns.

Expert opinion: Recent evidence suggests that ‘inadequate’ IAP with beta-lactams is more effective in preventing vertical transmission of GBS than previously thought. Newborns exposed to intrapartum beta-lactams and who are asymptomatic at birth are likely uninfected, irrespective of IAP duration before delivery. Hence, we may abandon the concept of ‘inadequate’ IAP with beta-lactams in early-onset GBS sepsis, relying primarily on clinical signs observed at birth for managing IAP-exposed neonates.

KEYWORDS:

• Group B Streptococcus
• sepsis
• newborn
• antibiotics
• intrapartum chemoprophylaxis
• prevention
• pharmacokinetics
• beta-lactams

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to doctor Roberta Creti (Reparto di Antibiotico Resistenza e Patogeni Speciali, Dipartimento di Malattie Infettive, Istituto Superiore di Sanità) who revised the manuscript and made very valuable suggestions.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.