727
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION

Influence of E-learning training on the acquisition of competences in basketball coaches in Cantabria

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Article: 2292876 | Received 11 Aug 2023, Accepted 05 Dec 2023, Published online: 26 Dec 2023

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to analyse the influence of e-learning training on the acquisition of competences in basketball coaches in Cantabria. The current landscape of basketball coach training shows an increasing demand for innovative training models and emerging pedagogies, including e-learning-based methodologies. The study sample consisted of fifty students from these courses, all above 16 years of age (36 males, 14 females). Among them, 16% resided outside the autonomous community of Cantabria, 10% resided more than 50 km from the city of Santander, 36% between 10 and 50 km, 14% less than 10 km, and 24% resided within Santander city. Data were collected through a Google Forms survey distributed by the Cantabrian Basketball Federation to training course students. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. The survey, consisting of 56 questions, was validated by two sports and health doctors and two senior basketball coaches. The collected data were processed and analysed using Microsoft® Excel version 16.74, and the results were expressed in percentages. The analysis revealed that 24.60% of the students trained through the e-learning methodology considered themselves fully qualified as basketball coaches, contrasting with 10.98% of those trained via traditional face-to-face methodology. The results of the study provide insights into important characteristics that can be adjusted and improved within the investigated educational process. Moreover, the study concludes that e-learning training effectively qualifies basketball coaches in Cantabria.

1. Introduction

Historically, learning and education required a physical approach for it to be assimilated and integrated into the construction of knowledge itself. This approach was constrained by time and space, which were not always insurmountable barriers to learning (García, Citation2007). Suasti et al. (Citation2020) emphasised how the teaching-learning process is constantly adapting to societal demands and student characteristics, such as students on basketball coaching courses in Cantabria who are looking for a training offer that avoids long-distance travel and is more accessible and cost-effective. According to Márquez-Baquero et al. (Citation2023), students are constantly compelled to acquire new skills and knowledge, which has resulted in profound and long-lasting changes and redesigns in training models in recent decades (Molina-García et al., Citation2020). Rivera et al. (Citation2017) proposed a model that divides the classroom into four distinct educational environments, eliminating the need for physical attendance:

  • None-Virtual Distance Education: This is the conventional form of distance education, increasingly prevalent in regions of low development with limited access to telematic networks.

  • Distance Education with Virtual Environments: This form is common among distance learning institutions, which often evolve from the classical model and start to incorporate the Internet into their educational offerings.

  • Bimodal or Hybrid Learning Environments: These refer to blended learning approaches, also known as hybrid, mixed, or dual-mode learning. They represent the coexistence of two traditional models—face-to-face and distance learning—within the same institution.

  • E-Learning: This term refers to distance education that predominantly employs the Internet as a transmission medium, primarily through virtual environments.

We presently exist within a knowledge society (Nonaka & Takeuchi, Citation1997), where training models and trends hinge upon information and communication technologies (ICT). According to Baena-Rojas et al. (Citation2023), these technologies have played an increasingly significant role in higher education to bolster students’ skills and qualifications. In the contemporary context, ICT is a crucial instrument for enhancing teaching-learning processes (Pla et al., Citation2020). Hence, novel methods and models of interaction, teaching, and learning are emerging that circumvent the spatial and temporal rigidity of conventional instruction (García, Citation2001). Characterised by their flexibility (García, Citation2001), these models leverage the Internet, and as suggested by Belmonte et al. (Citation2020) and Carretero (Citation2021), position students as active participants in building their knowledge.

This research analyses the initial and continuous training of sports coaches, focusing on basketball coaches. The aim is to provide them with the necessary competences to carry out their professional functions in accordance with the real demands of their respective fields of action (Rodríguez et al., Citation2022). According to Debesse’s viewpoint (Jiménez & Lorenzo, Citation2010), such training should take three forms: self-education (the coach chooses to self-learn), inter-education (professional development takes place through knowledge exchange and mutual analysis between professional colleagues), and hetero education (training institutions are responsible for training sports coaches). According to Jiménez (Citation2008), hetero education should help the sport coach to develop his or her own educational pathway and to generate a defining life pathway. Given that sport is recognised as an educational tool for people (Miñanas-Signes & Monfort-Pañego, Citation2020) and sport coaching is seen as a meaningful learning model—where students comprehend and apply their cognitive and socioemotional skills in real situations (Segarra et al., Citation2023)—the sport coach emerges as an educational actor with new formative resources. These resources can come from self-learning, institutional training, or experiential knowledge exchange (Jiménez & Lorenzo, Citation2010), all of which contribute significantly to their training motivational processes (Pulido et al., Citation2022). ICT and virtual environments, which have recently changed the educational paradigm, enhance the potential of these resources. In times of uncertainty, Aparicio-Gómez et al. (Citation2021) highlight the emergence of new pedagogies in these virtual learning environments, supporting individuals’ educational processes in the context of communication networks and fostering a novel learning culture.

This study, therefore, focuses on analysing the relationship between e-learning and the courses offered by the Cantabrian Basketball Federation, designed within an open, interactive, flexible, and ICT-enhanced distance learning framework. Moreover, the traditional model is subject to several limitations, such as the distance between the student’s home and the training centre, conflicts with work or academic schedules, economic resources, or global crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic (Pedró, Citation2020). Therefore, the study aims to explore the possibility of increasing the number of trainers through the appropriate development of competencies within an innovative training framework while ensuring the quality of training. To this end, the aim is to analyse the influence of e-learning training on the acquisition of competencies in basketball coaches in Cantabria.

2. Method

2.1. Design

The research employs a cross-sectional, non-experimental, quantitative methodological approach, wherein statistical techniques are utilised to analyse data gathered from surveys.

The problem was approached in a quantitative and descriptive manner via an ad hoc form for data collection. This form includes questions designed to elaborate on the variables, indicators of objectives, and predefined hypotheses, supplemented by classification questions (Fernández-Valmayor et al., Citation2007).

Stratified random sampling (MAE) was implemented based on the study levels provided by the Cantabrian Basketball Federation (Level 0, Level I, and Level II), as well as the modality (classroom or e-learning). Inclusion criteria for the sample are voluntary participation, whereas exclusion criteria encompass students who have not completed the e-learning courses.

Finally, we were able to determine the level of knowledge and satisfaction with the e-learning training among students of the Cantabrian Basketball Federation’s basketball coaching courses. It has also ascertained the level of acquisition of primary competencies for a basketball coach, as outlined in the curriculum of the higher degree diploma of sports education in basketball specialty (Orden EDC, Citation2016), as detailed below:

  • Capability to assemble a balanced basketball team by selecting players in accordance with the sports project and competitive demands.

  • Aptitude to assess and classify basketball players based on their technical, physical, psychological, tactical skills, playing abilities, and competitiveness.

  • Proficiency in planning the season, as well as programming short, medium, and long-term training schedules, global or specific development programs, team objectives, and required resources.

  • Skill in designing collective or individual training sessions.

  • Ability to conduct a training session, address existing contingencies, and achieve participant engagement and performance in line with proposed objectives and safety standards.

  • Expertise in managing basketball teams during high-performance competitions, making suitable tactical adjustments, managing arising contingencies, and making optimal decisions in accordance with the rules and planned objectives.

  • Competence in conducting scouting of one’s own team and competitors, managing available technological and human resources, and establishing criteria for individual and collective efficiency.

  • Aptitude to form multidisciplinary technical teams and coordinate their actions within the programming of a basketball team.

  • Ability to evaluate the preparation process of a team and the results obtained.

  • Proficiency in maintaining a professional identity and fostering a spirit of innovation and professional development, enabling adaptation to change in basketball and its organisational environment.

2.2. Participants

The present study employed non-probabilistic sampling for exploratory purposes and included a pilot survey. The eligible population for the survey consisted of 702 students (583 enrolled in the e-learning modality and 119 in the face-to-face modality) of the Cantabrian Basketball Federation’s coach training courses.

For the study’s design, a form based on the questionnaires of Leite et al. (Citation2011), Santos et al. (Citation2010), and Lozano et al. (Citation2018) was sent, to which fifty participants responded, accounting for 7% of the total. All participants were over the age of 16, and the majority were men (male = 36; female = 14). Sixteen percent lived outside the autonomous community of Cantabria, 10% lived more than 50 kilometres from Santander, 36% lived between 10 and 50 kilometres from the city, 14% lived less than 10 kilometres away, and 24% lived within Santander itself. 70% of those polled were employed, 28% did not receive any type of financial remuneration, and the average for those who did was between 51 and 150 euros per month, with only 14% having an employment contract.

Regarding the training provided by the Cantabrian Basketball Federation, 78% of the respondents have participated in an e-learning training course, while 22% have only been trained through classroom training. Likewise, it is observed that the Level 0 or Initiation course has been taken by 86% of the participants in the study, with the result that 14% have not taken this course and have gone directly to Level I, which has only been completed by 44% of the respondents, while 34% of the respondents have completed the Level II course. None of them have obtained the title of Superior Basketball Coach given by the Spanish Basketball Federation.

2.3. Instrument

The data was collected through a Google Forms survey distributed by the Cantabrian Basketball Federation and validated by experts in the field of sports and senior basketball coaches.

The survey comprises 56 questions grouped into the following blocks:

  1. Socio-demographic and Economic Data: This encompasses age, gender, place of residence, employment status as a basketball coach, category, financial remuneration, and contractual agreements.

  2. Coach Training: This focuses on the course level undertaken, the applied methodology (classroom or e-learning), possession of the Superior Basketball Coach title from the Spanish Basketball Federation, course accessibility, satisfaction level with the training experience, and the degree of ICT proficiency.

  3. Coach Training Effectiveness: This seeks the respondent’s opinion on the adequacy of e-learning training for becoming a basketball coach, competency acquisition, and the need to supplement e-learning training with practical sessions.

  4. Comparison of Learning Modalities (Face-to-Face and E-Learning): This concerns the respondent’s views on which modality imparts better training, the advantages and disadvantages of the e-learning modality, and areas for improvement in the e-learning modality.

2.4. Data analysis

Two types of descriptive scales were used to establish the criteria for evaluating the questionnaire responses: a numerical rating scale (NRS) and a Likert scale, which allowed the coaches to accurately represent the degree of importance they assigned to each of the items answered.

The data collection was carried out anonymously and online between September 1 and 31 December 2022. The selection of the sample was the result of contacting basketball coaches in Cantabria through the Federation. Coaches who voluntarily accepted the survey, including minors with the approval of their parents or guardians, signed the informed consent form at the time of sending it.

By using an online form as a data collection tool, the tabulation of data was carried out automatically and the results subsequently analysed and interpreted. The percentages were calculated using Microsoft® Excel version 16.74.

3. Results

The findings of this study provide insight into important aspects of the educational process that can be improved and demonstrate that e-learning training effectively improves the qualifications of basketball coaches in Cantabria. According to the data, nearly three-quarters of the participants were male, and a similar proportion lived outside of Santander, where the Cantabrian Basketball Federation headquarters are located. Almost all respondents said that e-learning training made it easier to access the Cantabrian Basketball Federation’s coaching courses, indicating a preference for this format over face-to-face instruction due to the elimination of time and cost constraints associated with travel. More than 80% of Cantabrian trainers rated their virtual training experiences as excellent or very good. This high rating is due to the format’s accessibility, simplicity, quality, and convenience, especially during the pandemic. Respondents also praised the Cantabrian Basketball Federation tutors and course director for their professionalism and attentiveness.

Almost all respondents said that e-learning training made it easier to access the Cantabrian Basketball Federation’s coaching courses, indicating a preference for this format over face-to-face instruction due to the elimination of time and cost constraints associated with travel. Virtual training was rated excellent or very good by more than 80% of Cantabrian trainers. This high rating is due to the format’s simplicity, ease of use, quality, and convenience, especially during the pandemic. Respondents also praised the professionalism and attentiveness of the Cantabrian Basketball Federation tutors and course director.

3.1. Training as a basketball coach

Regarding accessibility, 82.1% of the respondents trained in the e-learning modality perceive that this type of training has significantly facilitated their access to the Cantabrian Basketball Federation’s coaching courses. This is compared to 15.4% who believe it largely facilitated their access, and 2.5% who found it somewhat beneficial. Similarly, among those who undertook classroom-based training, 74% perceived that e-learning would significantly facilitate their access to the coaching courses, while 22% thought it would be very beneficial. 4% found it somewhat or not particularly helpful. In terms of satisfaction with the training received, more than 84% of those surveyed rated their e-learning experience in the Cantabria Basketball Federation’s coaching courses as excellent or very good. Positive responses emphasised factors such as the simplicity, timeliness, intuitiveness, and flexibility of the e-learning methodology, particularly during the pandemic, and praised the quantity and quality of the provided materials and personalised tutorials. Conversely, classroom training was rated as excellent by 42% of respondents, very good by 30%, good by 18%, acceptable by 2%, while 8% had a negative experience. The survey also provides insight into the students’ perceived digital competence. In the e-learning modality, 96.8% of respondents believe they have excellent or significant command and knowledge of ICTs. In comparison, 2.6% rate their command as good, the same percentage as those who believe they fall short in this area. Among face-to-face trainees, 80% believe they have significant or excellent command and knowledge of ICTs, with 6% considering their proficiency as good, and 4% deeming their skills and knowledge insufficient.

3.2. Basketball coach training

In the context of e-learning coach training, 46.2% of e-learning and 40% of face-to-face trainees believe both the e-learning and classroom methodologies used by the Cantabrian Basketball Federation sufficiently support the acquisition of skills as basketball coaches. However, 53.8% of e-learning trainees and 44% of classroom trainees consider the theoretical aspects covered in both courses to be sufficient but lacking in practical application. As a result, 71.8% of respondents from both modalities believe additional practical training is necessary for their adequate qualification as basketball coaches. In assessing the acquisition of basketball coach competencies included in the curriculum of the higher degree diploma of sports education specializing in basketball (Government of Cantabria, 2016), we asked respondents about their perception after completing the training process. The data was separated based on those who have been trained with e-learning (Table ) and those who have opted for classroom training (Table ). When assessing whether the received training has enabled proficiency in the various skills selected, the results indicate that responses are considerably more positive for e-learning training than for classroom training. Furthermore, the proportion of negative responses or responses reflecting uncertainty is higher in the context of classroom training (Table ). The evaluation results reveal that, among participants who believe they have fully acquired the competencies that qualify them as basketball coaches, the percentage is 13.62% higher for those trained via e-learning compared to those trained face-to-face. Similarly, the percentage of those who believe they are quite well trained and sufficiently trained is higher by 7.3% and 7.72% respectively for the e-learning group. On the contrary, negative evaluations or uncertainty are more prevalent among those trained face-to-face. Specifically, the percentage of those who believe they have not been trained much is 2.1% higher, 2.15% higher for those who consider that they have not been trained at all, with a notable difference of 24.85% for those who are unsure.

Table 1. Perceptions of basketball coach competency acquisition in e-learning training

Table 2. Perceptions of basketball coach competency acquisition in face-to-face training

Table 3. Average of total percentages of perceptions on the acquisition of basketball coach competencies in e-learning and classroom training

3.3. Comparison between face-to-face and e-learning modality

Respondents who have taken a face-to-face and online coach training course were asked which methodology they believe has trained them more adequately, with 60% preferring e-learning methodology, 30% preferring face-to-face and 10% being indifferent. Continuing with the comparison between both training modalities, Table shows the most relevant responses derived from asking respondents about what they believe are the advantages and disadvantages of e-learning in training basketball coaches as provided by the Cantabrian Basketball Federation. The advantages, such as accessibility, autonomy, flexibility, time compatibility, quality of materials, high enrolment capacity, the possibility of overcoming geographical barriers and the option of asynchronous viewing of classes, outweighed the disadvantages. Among these were the lack of practical experience and interpersonal interactions, lengthy exams, lack of formative discussion, high demands on short-term memory, excessive workload, and information, and slow or non-existent feedback from tutors. Table reflects the aspects that should be improved in the e-learning training provided by the Cantabria Basketball Federation for basketball coaches in Cantabria.

Table 4. Advantages and disadvantages of CBF’s e-learning training for coaches

Table 5. Aspects that should be improved in the e-learning training of CBF coaches

The study found that e-learning training received a more favourable perception than face-to-face instruction. This perception was even noted amongst those who had experienced both formats, with one in four e-learning students believing they were fully qualified as a basketball coach, compared to one in ten face-to-face students. Finally, it is worth highlighting that e-learning training is predominantly positively evaluated and instils greater confidence about adequate training compared to face-to-face training, which engenders more uncertainty, as evidenced in our results in Table .

Table 6. Perception on the acquisition of basic skills in e-learning and classroom training

4. Discussion

The main aim of this study was to analyse the influence of e-learning training on the acquisition of competences in basketball coaches in Cantabria.

In relation to the objective of the study developed, Rivera et al. (Citation2017) include this methodology within an asynchronous training model that obviates the need for a physical classroom, being viable in a field of sports education typically dependent on face-to-face modalities. Considering Campos and Martín’s assertion in their study on the perception of professional competencies of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences graduates (Campos-Izquierdo & Martín-Acero, Citation2016, p. 343)—“it is quite or very important to possess all the specific professional competencies studied for an adequate and efficient professional performance in any of the occupations or job functions” - this study was designed with these competencies in mind. As Gil et al. (Citation2023) did, we determined competencies like scientific, methodological, communicative, personal, and social competencies, focusing the study on the acquisition of these competencies through an analysis of e-learning and face-to-face training modalities. Feu et al. (Citation2010) posit that training coaches is heterogeneous because it originates from diverse educational trajectories, such as the federative, formal education model that this study examines. Following these authors’ approach, we designed a questionnaire to explore the training of sports coaches, specifically basketball coaches in Cantabria.

The results, demonstrating a male predominance among the respondents consistent with most sports-related studies such as Ayala-Zuloaga et al. (Citation2015), confirm that e-learning training significantly facilitates access to formal sports education courses due to its inherent benefits (Espinosa-Izquierdo et al., Citation2021), thus overcoming barriers like distance or time constraints. Although Bonal and González (Citation2021) reported significant inequalities in learning opportunities during the COVID-19 lockdown, hindering the acquisition and development of competencies and skills across different contexts, most respondents rated the e-learning training of the Cantabrian Basketball Federation’s basketball coaches as excellent or very good. This favourable assessment is attributable to e-learning opportunities during pandemic times, like those experienced with COVID-19. Positive aspects such as easy course access and completion, coupled with the quantity and quality of the materials implemented in online sports training courses, contribute to this positive evaluation. Additionally, the students’ ICT proficiency in the e-learning modality contributed to its successful implementation, overcoming some critical elements examined in studies such as García and Cabero (Citation2016), and Augustyn and Juva (Citation2014).

When analysing the training of basketball coaches through e-learning, attention has been paid to the level of impact of this type of training in reference to the practical knowledge acquired through it, as suggested by studies such as Jiménez and Lorenzo (Citation2007), which focused on the analysis of training strategies in basketball coaches. Likewise, the present study reflects that this training modality addresses the theoretical requirements of such training but not the practical ones, as highlighted in the studies by Leite et al. (Citation2011).The production of high-quality videos and explanatory tutorials, although valuable, does not fully meet the practical training needs of the participants due to limited personal interaction with other students and the inability to apply theoretical knowledge at the practical level.

Taking into account the objectives of studies such as Ruiz-Sanchis et al. (Citation2016), which propose identifying the degree of development of the dimensions during the learning process, this study examines students’ perceptions of the acquisition of the competencies required to perform as a basketball coach, as studied by Santos et al. (Citation2010) when analysing the perception of coaches’ competence and the recognition of training needs related to professional competences; that of Lozano et al. (Citation2018) carried out to find out the profile of the basketball coach at the school stage; or that of Cunha et al. (Citation2010), who studied the self-perception of professional competences of football coaches in terms of academic education. The results indicate that the level of positive perception of fundamental basketball coach training is higher in e-learning than during face-to-face training, where there is room for negative opinions, which are only residual in e-learning training. Most respondents trained with both models showed a preference for e-learning training, with 60% versus 30% who preferred face-to-face training and 10% being indifferent. These results reflect experiences in both modalities, leading to the identification of various advantages and disadvantages of e-learning training. The most prominent benefits include accessibility, autonomy, flexibility, compatibility with time constraints, quality of materials, the ability to overcome geographical distances, and a higher enrolment capacity. These benefits confirm that e-learning training utilising virtual environments facilitates and encourages potential students across Cantabria to participate. Conversely, e-learning training presents several challenges, such as the lack of interpersonal relationships, protracted exams, a deficiency in formative discussion, an intensive demand on short-term memory, excessive workload and information, challenging feedback mechanisms from trainers, extended course duration, and notably, the lack of practical experience. While the provided tutorials were of high quality, Blázquez Manzano (Citation2009, p. 89) underscores “the significance of the tutor’s role as active participants in the platform” within e-learning training. The quantity of tutors was also found to be inadequate in satisfying students’ needs.

5. Conclusions

The study has identified several advantages and disadvantages associated with e-learning training, from which potential areas for improvement in this type of training can be identified, such as reducing the length and number of tests, providing more personalised tutorials, creating more dynamic videos, and incorporating a practical classroom module at some point during the course.

Similarly, from the results obtained the study participants suggest reducing the length and number of tests within the courses, incorporating an on-court practical module, producing more dynamic and engaging videos, reducing the length of the courses, and increasing personalised tutorials.

24.60% of the students trained with e-learning methodology consider themselves fully qualified as basketball coaches, compared to 10.98% of those trained with traditional face-to-face methods.

In conclusion, the e-learning training provided by the Cantabrian Basketball Federation effectively prepares basketball coaches, overcoming the limitations of face-to-face training and adapting to the new educational landscape caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Cantabrian Basketball Federation for their collaboration in the development of the study, as well as all the students who participated in it.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Notes on contributors

Josep Alemany-Iturriaga

Josep Alemany is a Professor in Teacher Education and Sports at the European University of the Atlantic, Project Coordinator of the European project Erasmus + Digital Teachers Academy (Digital TA), and Academic Director of the master’s degree in Basketball Sports Coaching at the Iberoamerican University Foundation. Through his work, he supports the educational community by providing reflective meeting spaces to improve the practical training of in-service and pre-service teachers, as well as enabling coaches to master all areas related to basketball coaching.

Álvaro Velarde-Sotres

Álvaro Velarde Sotres has a PhD in Health Projects. Master’s Degree in Prevention and Rehabilitation of Sports Injuries. Master’s Degree in Teacher Training for Compulsory Secondary Education, Baccalaureate, Vocational Training and Language Teaching in the Speciality of Physical Education. Graduate in Physical Activity and Sport Sciences. Professor and researcher at the European University of the Atlantic.

Javier Jorge

Javier Jorge holds a PhD in the field of sports training from the University of Barcelona. Master’s degree in physical Activity in health, master’s degree in High performances sports. Currently, accompanying young people in their personal, sports and academic development.

Kamil Giglio

Kamil Giglio holds a PhD in Engineering and Knowledge Management from the Federal University of Santa Catarina - UFSC - Brazil. Professor, coordinator, and researcher of international projects dealing with the intersection between education, communication, and technology, with specific focus on teacher training, the innovation process, and the pedagogical use of ICTs in the educational context.

References

  • Aparicio-Gómez, O. Y., Ostos-Ortiz, O. L., Aparicio-Gómez, O. Y., & Ostos-Ortiz, O. L. (2021). Pedagogías emergentes en ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje [Emerging pedagogies in virtual learning environments]. International Journal of Pedagogy and Educational Innovation: RIPIE, 1(1), 11–12. https://doi.org/10.51660/ripie.v1i1.25
  • Augustyn, T., & Juva, V. (2014). The use of information technology in non-formal education of handball coaches. Journal of Human Sport & Exercise, 9(1), 335–340. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2014.9.Proc1.17
  • Ayala-Zuloaga, C. F., Aguirre-Loaiza, H. H., & Ramos-Bermúdez, S. (2015). Formación Académica y experiencia deportiva de los entrenadores suramericanos [academic and athletic experience of South American coaches]. Revista Brasileira de Ciências do Esporte, 37(4), 367–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbce.2015.09.001
  • Baena-Rojas, J. J., Castillo-Martínez, I. M., Méndez-Garduño, J. I., Suárez-Brito, P., López-Caudana, E. O., & López-Caudana, E. O. (2023). Information communication technologies, artificial intelligence, and Social Robotics: A complex-thinking vector in higher education? Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 14(2), 21–50. https://bulenttarman.com/index.php/jsser/article/view/4740
  • Belmonte, M. L., García-Sanz, M. P., & Galián, B. (2020). Dos perspectivas de una misma meta: pertinencia y nivel de logro de las competencias universitarias [Two perspectives of the same goal: relevance and level of achievement of university competencies]. Educar, 56(2), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.1085
  • Blázquez Manzano, A. (2009). Análisis de una experiencia formativa. E-learning/Blended learning con dinamizadores deportivos [an analysis of experience training E-learning/Blended learning with drivers sports]. Journal of Sport Science, 5(2), 77–90. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/865/86511955001.pdf
  • Bonal, X., & González, S. (2021). Educación formal e informal en confinamiento: una creciente desigualdad de oportunidades de aprendizaje [Formal and informal education during the lockdown: A growing inequality of learning opportunities]. Journal of Sociology of Education, 14(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.7203/RASE.14.1.18177
  • Campos-Izquierdo, A., & Martín-Acero, R. (2016). Percepción de las competencias profesionales de los graduados en Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte [Perception of professional competences of graduates in Science of Physical Activity and Sport]. Journal of Sport Psychology, 25(2), 339–346. https://archives.rpd-online.com/article/view/v25-n2-campos-izquierdo-martin-etal/Campos_Izquierdo_Martinetal.html
  • Carretero, M. (2021). Constructivismo y educación [constructivism and education]. Tilde.
  • Cunha, G., Mesquita, I., Moreno, M. P., Boleto, A. F., Tavares, T. M., & Silva, P. F. (2010). Autopercepción de las competencias profesionales de los entrenadores de fútbol en función de la experiencia profesional y de la formación académica [Football coaches’ perceptions of professional competences according to the professional experience and academic Education]. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 10(1), 23–36. https://revistas.um.es/cpd/article/view/110261
  • Espinosa-Izquierdo, J. G., Espinosa-Figueroa, J. A., & Espinosa-Arreaga, G. B. (2021). E-learning una herramienta necesaria para el aprendizaje [E-learning a necessary tool for learning]. Polo Del Conocimiento, 6(3), 659–669. https://polodelconocimiento.com/ojs/index.php/es/article/view/2394/4897
  • Fernández-Valmayor, A., Fernández-Pampillón, A., & Merino, J. (2007). Innovación en el campus virtual: metodologías y herramientas [Innovation in the virtual campus: methodologies and tools]. Editorial Complutense.
  • Feu, S., Ibáñez, S. J., & Gozalo Delgado, M. (2010). Influencia de la formación formal y no formal en las orientaciones que adoptan los entrenadores deportivos [Influence of formal and non-formal training on coaching style]. Revista de Educación, 353, 321–332. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46569791_Influencia_de_la_formacion_formal_y_no_formal_en_las_orientaciones_que_adoptan_los_entrenadores_deportivos
  • García, L. (2001). La educación a distancia. De la teoría a la práctica [Distance education. From theory to practice]. Editorial Ariel.
  • García, L. (Ed.). (2007). De la educación a distancia a la educación virtual [From distance education to virtual Education]. Editorial Ariel.
  • García, C. J., & Cabero, J. (2016). Evolución y estado actual del e-learning en la Formación Profesional española [Evolution and current status of e-learning in Spanish Vocational Training]. RIED Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 19(2), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.19.2.15800
  • Gil, Y., Pons, Y., Licea, R. E., & Gálvez, F. (2023). La formación por competencias profesionales de los profesores de Educación Física de la Educación Superior [The training by professional competencies of Physical Education teachers in Higher Education]. PODIUM: Revista de Ciencia y Tecnología en la Cultura Física, 18(1), e1280. https://podium.upr.edu.cu/index.php/podium/article/view/1280
  • Jiménez, S. (2008). El desarrollo de la pericia en los entrenadores expertos de baloncesto: etapas en la formación del entrenador a partir del estudio de su itinerario vital [The development of expertise in expert basketball coaches: stages in coach education from the study of their life itinerary] [ Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid]. UPM digital archive. https://doi.org/10.20868/UPM.thesis.1852
  • Jiménez, S., & Lorenzo, A. (2007). Estrategias de formación en los entrenadores de baloncesto [Training strategies in basketball coaches]. Cultura, Ciencia y Deporte, 7(3), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.12800/281
  • Jiménez, S., & Lorenzo, A. (2010). La formación de los entrenadores en baloncesto. Aplicaciones didácticas [the training of basketball coaches. Educational applications]. Wanceulen.
  • Leite, N., Coelho, E., & Sampaio, J. (2011). Assessing the importance given by basketball coaches to training contents. Journal of Human Kinetics, 30(2011), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10078-011-0080-3
  • Lozano, E., Serrano-Huete, V., & Párraga Montilla, J. A. (2018). Perfil del entrenador de baloncesto en la etapa escola en Andalucía. Revista Digital de Educación Física, 9(53), 150–167. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349641676_PERFIL_DEL_ENTRENADOR_DE_BALONCESTO_EN_LA_ETAPA_ESCOLAR_EN_ANDALUCIA
  • Márquez-Baquero, M., Azofeifa-Mora, C., & Salazar-Rojas, W. (2023). Physical education and teaching kills in initial training. Revista Electronica Educare, 27(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.27-2.15852
  • Miñanas-Signes, V., & Monfort-Pañego, M. (2020). Justificación del valor educativo de la Educación Física y el docente. ¿Qué profesional del deporte debe impartir la materia de Educación Física? ¿El Maestro/a y Profesor/a de Educación Física o el Monitor/a deportivo/a? [Justification of the educational value of Physical Education and the teacher. Which sports professional should teach the subject of Physical Education? The Teacher and Physical Education Teacher or the Sports Monitor?]. Challenges, (38), 852–867. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v38i38.74722
  • Molina-García, P. F., Molina-García, A. R., & Gentry-Jones, J. (2020). El e-learning y la evolución en la enseñanza y aprendizaje de la educación superior [E-learning and the evolution of teaching and learning in higher Education]. Mastering the Sciences, 6(4), 491–500. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8385962
  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1997). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press.
  • Orden ECD/86/2016, of July 26, que establece el currículo, las pruebas y requisitos de acceso de los ciclos inicial y final de grado medio correspondientes al título de Técnico Deportivo en Baloncesto en la Comunidad Autónoma de Cantabria [which establishes the curriculum, tests and access requirements of the initial and final cycles of medium grade corresponding to the title of Sports Technician in Basketball in the Autonomous Community of Cantabria]. BOC. July 26, 2016, pp. 17059–17143. https://boc.cantabria.es/boces/verAnuncioAction.do?idAnuBlob=302711
  • Pedró, F. (2020). COVID-19 y educación superior en América Latina y el Caribe: efectos, impactos y recomendaciones políticas [COVID-19 and higher education in Latin America and the Caribbean: effects, impacts and policy recommendations]. Carolina Analysis, 36(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.33960/AC_36.2020
  • Pla, C., Pardo, M. A., Moya-Llamas, M. J., Jódar, A., Micó, M., & Valdés, J. (2020). Uso de tecnologías digitales en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje. Aplicación en docencia presencial y no presencial con el alumnado de la rama de ingeniería [use of digital technologies in the teaching-learning process. Application in classroom and non-classroom teaching with students of the engineering branch. In R. Roig-Vila (Ed.), La docencia en la Enseñanza Superior: Nuevas aportaciones desde la investigación e innovación educativas (pp. 816–826). Octahedron. http://rua.ua.es/dspace/handle/10045/110076
  • Pulido, J. J., López-Gajardo, M. A., Ponce-Bondón, J. C., Díaz-García, J., & Leo, F. M. (2022). ¿Influye la experiencia del entrenador en sus procesos motivacionales y su estilo interpersonal de apoyo hacia las necesidades psicológicas básicas de los deportistas? [Does the coach ‘s experience influence his or her motivational processes and interpersonal style of support towards the basic psychological needs of the athletes? Revista Española de Educación Física y Deportes, 436(4), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.55166/reefd.vi436(4).1057
  • Rivera, P., Alonso, C., & Sancho, J. M. (2017). Desde la educación a distancia al e-Learning emergencia, evolución y consolidación [From distance education to e-Learning emergence, evolution and consolidation]. Revista Educación y Tecnología, 10, 1–13. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6148504
  • Rodríguez, H., León, L. L., & De la Paz-Ávila, J. E. (2022). La enseñanza deportiva y el entrenamiento deportivo [Sports education and sports training]. PODIUM: Revista de Ciencia y Tecnología en la Cultura Física, 17(2), 823–838.
  • Ruiz-Sanchis, L., Martín, J., Tamarit, I., Bahiense, V., Ros, C., & Dos Santos, S. L. C. (2016). Formación e-learning para docentes en deportes de combate olímpico: El boxeo olímpico como experiencia en dos municipios del estado de Caerá (Brasil) [E-learning training for teachers in Olympic combat sports: Olympic boxing as an experience in two municipalities in the state of Caerá (Brazil)]. Brazilian Journal of School Physical Education, 2(3), 70–82. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306323786_Formacion_e-learning_para_docentes_en_deportes_de_combate_olimpico_El_boxeo_olimpico_como_experiencia_en_dos_municipios_del_estado_de_Caera_Brasil
  • Santos, S., Mesquita, I., Amandio, G., & Rosado, A. F. B. (2010). Coaches’ perceptions of competence and acknowledgement of training needs related to professional competences. Journal of Sports, Science & Medicine, 9(1), 62–70. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258035565_Coaches’_Perceptions_of_Competence_and_Acknowledgement_of_Training_Needs_Related_to_Professional_Competences
  • Segarra, S. R., Zamora, S. M., González, S. A., Vitonera, M. M., Zamora, S. M., González, S. A., & Vitonera, M. M. (2023). El aprendizaje significativo en la educación actual: Una reflexión desde la perspectiva crítica [Meaningful learning in today’s education: A reflection from a critical perspective]. Educare, 27(1), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.46498/reduipb.v27i1.1896
  • Suasti, J. R., Andrade, M. D., Ormaza, J. A., Zambrano, V. G., & Alcívar, G. A. (2020). Entornos virtuales de aprendizaje en la educación superior: valoración desde la perspectiva de los estudiantes [Virtual learning environments in higher education: assessment from the students’ perspective]. In E. Colomo, E. Sánchez, J. Ruiz, & J. Sánchez (Eds.), La tecnología como eje del cambio metodológico (pp. 1599–1602). UMA editorial. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7832967