Analgesic and Antiallodynic Effects of 4-Fluoro-N-(4-Sulfamoylbenzyl) Benzene Sulfonamide in a Murine Model of Pain

Abstract

Introduction

Physical, chemical, thermal injuries along with infectious diseases lead to acute pain with associated inflammation, being the primary cause of hospital visits. Moreover, neuropathic pain associated with diabetes is a serious chronic disease leading to high morbidity and poor quality of life.

Objective

Earlier multiple sulphonamides have been reported to have an antinociceptive and antiallodynic profile. 4-Fluoro-N-(4-sulfamoylbenzyl) Benzene Sulfonamide (4-FBS), a synthetic sulfonamide with reported carbonic anhydrase inhibitory activity, was investigated for its potential effects in mice model of acute and diabetic neuropathic pain.

Methods and Results

4-FBS was given orally (p.o.) one hour before the test and then mice were screened for antinociceptive activity by using the tail immersion test, which showed significant antinociceptive effect at both 20 and 40 mg/kg doses. To explore the possible mechanisms, thermal analgesia of 4-FBS was reversed by the 5HT₃ antagonist ondansetron 1mg/kg intraperitoneally (i.p.) and by the µ receptor antagonist naloxone (1 mg/kg i.p.), implying possible involvement of serotonergic and opioidergic pathways in the analgesic effect of 4-FBS. Diabetes was induced in mice by a single dose of streptozotocin (STZ) 200 mg/kg i.p. After two weeks, animals first became hyperalgesic and progressively allodynic in the fourth week, which was evaluated through behavioral parameters like thermal and mechanical tests. 4-FBS at 20 and 40 mg/kg p.o. significantly reversed diabetes-induced hyperalgesia and allodynia at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes.

Conclusion

These findings are significant and promising while further studies are warranted to explore the exact molecular mechanism and the potential of 4-FBS in diabetic neuropathic pain.

Keywords:

• sulfonamides
• streptozotocin; STZ
• antinociception
• diabetes mellitus; DM
• neuropathic pain
• von Frey filaments

Introduction

Physical, thermal, and chemical noxious stimuli, and infectious diseases, are the leading cause of pain and associated inflammation.^1,2 Acute pain is a protective mechanism of homeostasis but has considerable distress that leads to poor quality of life. Tissue and nerve damage translates into intensified pain states, which are driven by afferent traffic caused by otherwise harmless or slightly aversive mechanical and thermal stimuli evoking a behavioral response consistent with a more pronounced stimulus.^3,4 Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are usually used for the treatment of mild to moderate painful states, but these drugs are associated with lasting side effects including gastric ulceration and subsequent bleeding.⁵ Opiates have also been used as narcotic analgesics but are coupled with serious adverse effects, primarily tolerance, and continued use is translated in the form of addiction and dependence.⁶

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the leading causes of morbidity, affecting 30–50% individuals presented with diabetes mellitus (DM) and also contributes a greater cost to the health care systems of both developed and developing countries.^7,8 The structural deformity of the peripheral nervous system and abnormal functioning of nerves that supply to organs develops a complex and unique pattern of symptoms and signs that are characteristic of diabetic neuropathy. These involve stocking-glove pattern of pain, burning pain especially at nights, lancinating or sharp pain, heightened pain response to touch, and pain from non-noxious stimuli or allodynia. All of these symptoms are called positive symptoms of DPN, while negative symptoms include numbness, cold, and loss of sensory sensation.^9,10 Despite the prevalence of DPN and its contribution to disease burden on societies, several treatment options only relate to glucose control and weight loss. The currently available centrally acting drugs for DPN, like antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and opioids, produce the serious risk of use dependence and addiction.¹¹

Research over recent decades has been conducted to look for non-opioid analgesics that can act via a central mechanism.¹² Many studies indicate that the serotonergic pathway, primarily the 5-HT_1A receptor activation, leads to a novel mechanism mimicking central neuroadaptive analgesic action upon receiving nociceptive stimulation.¹³

Sulfonamide derivatives have been documented to have diuretic,¹⁴ antiepileptic,¹⁵ analgesic and antiallodynic,¹⁶ anti-cancer,¹⁷ hepatoprotective, and GABA_A modulatory activities.¹⁸ Additionally, sulfonamides have been documented to inhibit neuropathic pain, reverse mechanical hyperalgesia, and allodynia in a dose-dependent manner.¹⁹ Additionally, the carbonic anhydrase inhibitory effects of sulphonamides have been reported to reverse oxaliplatin-induced allodynia through reversing oxaliplatin-induced decrement in intracellular pH in mouse dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons.²⁰ 4-FBS has been reported to have a dual inhibitory effect on alkaline phosphatase and carbonic anhydrase,²¹ and recent data suggest carbonic anhydrase inhibitors as a potential newer drug target for the management of neuropathic pain.¹⁹ Keeping in view this diverse pharmacological profile of 4-FBS (alkaline phosphatase and carbonic anhydrase inhibitory effect), this study was designed to explore the potential of 4-FBS in a murine model of acute pain and diabetes-induced neuropathic pain.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Male BALB/c (n=6/group) mice 8- to 12-weeks-old (24–30 g), obtained from the National Institute of Health, Pakistan were randomly housed six (6) per cage and maintained at temperature 24 ± 1°C with 12 h dark/light cycle in the animal house facility of COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus. Standard rodent chow diet and water were provided ad libitum. All the behavioral experiments were performed during the light cycle from 8:00 am to 2:00 pm, to avoid disturbance in the diurnal rhythm. The experimentation on animals was performed in compliance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and accordance with the rules and ethics set by the Ethical Committee of COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad campus under the approval Letter number PHM.Eth/cs-M04/11-34.

Treatment Schedule

Mice (n=6/group) were divided into five groups. All groups received streptozotocin (STZ) as a single high dose of 200 mg/kg i.p. once except the vehicle control group.^22–24 Group, I served as a positive control (STZ group). Group II dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO 5%) p.o. remained as a vehicle control group. Group III received gabapentin 75 mg/kg i.p. as the standard, while group IV and V received 4-FBS suspension 20 and 40 mg/kg p.o. via oral gavage dissolved in DMSO 5% to diabetic neuropathic mice and pain behavioral parameters like allodynia and hyperalgesia were evaluated at different time interval 30, 60, 90 and 120 minutes (min).

Drugs and Chemicals

Sulfonamide compound, i.e., 4-FBS was provided by Mariya Al Rashida,²¹ STZ was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA), naloxone 0.3 mg/mL (Brand name NALOX by Haji Medicines Co), ondansetron 8 mg/4mL (ONSET by Pharmedic Pvt Ltd) were purchased from the model retail pharmacy established in Ayub Teaching Hospital Abbottabad, Pakistan. One-touch basic blood glucose monitoring system by a Life scan was used for measuring blood glucose levels.

Tail Immersion Test

In the tail immersion test, a noxious pain stimulus was used to quantify thermal pain in naïve male BALB/c mice treated with 4-FBS 20 and 40 mg/kg against the normal saline group. About 1/3rd of the mouse tail was immersed into hot water which was maintained at 54± 0.5ᴼC (noxious pain stimulus for mice) and test recording (tail flick) was noted at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. The time between the application of thermal stimulus and response, i.e., tail-flick latency was noted via digital stopwatch. A 15 seconds (s) cut-off time was set to avoid tissue injury.^25,26

Reversal of Analgesia by Naloxone and Ondansetron

To explore the possible involvement of serotonergic²⁷ and opioidergic pathways,²⁸ selected groups of mice (n=6/group) were given 4-FBS 20 mg/kg p.o. separately. After one hour, the same mice received naloxone 1mg/kg i.p, while other 4-FBS treated group received ondansetron 1mg/kg i.p. and tail-flick latency was quantified against normal saline as described earlier.^25,26

Induction and Assessment of Diabetic Neuropathic Pain

Mice were food-deprived overnight for 16 h before administration of a single dose of STZ 200 mg/kg to induce β-cell necrosis.^22,24 Mice were immediately provided food and 10% sucrose solution to avoid severe hypoglycemia. After 72 h, mice having random blood glucose levels >250 mg/dl were included in the study.²⁴ Blood glucose and body weight were measured at a different time interval during the experimentation. To avoid infection due to polyuria, mice sawdust bedding was changed on alternate days. After 4 weeks, on the 29th-day post STZ treatment, animals were transferred to a wire mesh cage, given an acclimatization period of 15–45 min, and then evaluated for thermal hyperalgesia and allodynia.^29,30

Assessment of Static Allodynia (Paw Withdrawal Threshold (g))

Static allodynia was assessed using von Frey filaments ranging from 0.008 to 4 g. For this purpose, mice right hind paw was exposed through a mesh floor having a pore size of 10×10 cm and an opaque cup was used to avoid visual contact. An acclimatization period of 15–45 min was given for initial exploration and grooming.^29,30 Filaments were applied for 6–8 seconds on the plantar surface of the hind paw perpendicularly until it distorted. The careful observation was carried not to touch the less sensitive tori (footpads) of mice with filaments. The von Frey filament was applied 05 times to the hind paw at intervals of several seconds to determine the mean score which also served as the pain related score. After this, the next filament was introduced in a descending pattern using up and down technique.³⁰

Statistics

Data were expressed as means ± S.E.M. Parameters were examined for normality with the Shapiro–Wilk normality test and all data was found normal. One-way ANOVA was followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test. GraphPad Prism v.8.3.1 was used for the analysis of data. The statistical significance level was set as p< 0.05.

Results

Effects of 4-FBS 20 and 40 mg/kg on Acute Thermal Antinociception Activity

As shown in Figures 1 and 2, 4-FBS at 20 and 40 mg/kg p.o. significantly *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 elevated tail-flick latency time at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min, when compared with saline group except for 4-FBS 40 mg/kg at 120 min. One way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test was used as statistical analysis.

Figure 1 Effect of 4-FBS 20 mg/kg on tail flick latency time at different time-points. BALB/c mice (n=6/group) were used. The graph shows antinociceptive activity of 4-FBS 20 mg/kg p.o. in the tail-flick latency time. One way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test shows significance difference between at 30, 60, 90 and 120 min between 4-FBS vs. saline vehicle control, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 2 Effect of 4-FBS 20 mg/kg on tail flick latency time at different time-points. BALB/c mice (n=6/group) were used. The graph shows the antinociceptive activity of 4-FBS 40 mg/kg p.o. in tail-flick latency time. One way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test shows significance difference at 30, 60 and 90 except 120 min between 4-FBS vs. saline vehicle control, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Effects of Ondansetron (1 mg/kg) and Naloxone (1 mg/kg) on 4-FBS 20 mg/kg Acute Thermal Antinociception Activity

As shown in Figures 3 and 4, two mice groups (n=6) received 4-FBS 20 mg/kg p.o. After one hour, they were administered ondansetron and naloxone 1 mg/kg i.p. separately, which abolished the anti-nociceptive effect of 4-FBS 20 mg/kg in the tail-flick latency time although the result was statistically (unpaired t-test) non-significant when compared with normal saline.

Figure 3 Shows partial reversal by ondansetron, 1mg/kg in tail flick latency protocol. Pain threshold was observed in 4-FBS 20mg/kg treated mice but it was statistically non-significant when compared with the saline vehicle control group.

Figure 4 Shows that naloxone, 1mg/kg shows partial reversal of analgesia in tail flick latency protocol. Pain threshold was observed in 4-FBS at 20mg/kg treated mice, which was statistically non-significant when compared with the saline vehicle control group.

Effects of 4-FBS 20 and 40 mg/kg on STZ Induced Diabetic Thermal Hyperalgesia

As shown in Figure 5, 4-FBS at 20 and 40 mg/kg p.o. significantly **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 increased tail-flick latency time in STZ-induced diabetic thermal hyperalgesia at different time points of 30, 60 90, and 120 min except for 4-FBS 20 mg/kg at 120 min. It is pertinent to mention that using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test, the 4-FBS 20 mg/kg result was comparable to the standard drug gabapentin 75 mg/kg at 30, 60, and 90 min, while 40mg/kg was comparable at time points of 30, 60, 90, and 120 min.

Figure 5 Effect of 4-FBS 20 and 40mg/kg on tail flick latency time at different time-points. BALB/c mice (n=6/group) were used. 4-FBS at 20 and 40mg/kg shows significant antihyperalgesic activity in the mouse tail-flick latency time. One way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test shows significance difference between STZ control and 4-FBS 20mg +STZ group at all-time intervals except for 120 min while 4-FBS 40mg +STZ group at all-time. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Effects of 4-FBS 20 and 40 mg/kg on STZ Induced Diabetic Static Allodynia

As shown in Figures 6 and 7, oral administration of 4-FBS 20 mg/kg to diabetic mice resulted in a significant **p<0.01, ***p<0.001 reversal of static allodynia by increasing paw withdrawal threshold at 30, 60, 90 min, while 4-FBS at 40 mg/kg increased paw withdrawal at 60, 90, 120 min. Application of one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test showed the response at 4-FBS 20 mg/kg 120 min and 4-FBS 40 mg/kg 30 min only as non-significant, although considerable paw withdrawal latency can be observed.

Figure 6 Effect of 4-FBS 20 mg/kg on paw withdrawal threshold time at different time-points. BALB/c mice (n=6/group) were used. 4-FBS at 20 mg/kg shows significant antiallodynic activity in the paw withdrawal threshold. One way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test shows significance difference between STZ control and 4-FBS 20mg +STZ group at all-time intervals except for 120 min. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 7 Effect of 4-FBS 40 mg/kg on paw withdrawal threshold time at different time-points. BALB/c mice (n=6/group) were used. 4-FBS at 40 mg/kg shows significant antiallodynic activity in the paw withdrawal threshold (n=6). One way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test shows significance difference between STZ control and 4-FBS 20mg +STZ group at all-time intervals except for 30 min. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Discussion

Our findings showed that 4-FBS has significant antihyperalgesic, and antiallodynic effects in the murine model of diabetic neuropathic pain Figures 5–7. The compound also showed an analgesic effect in the acute thermal pain mice model at 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes, which is a significant effect in terms of both potency and longevity (Figures 1 and 2). To ascertain the mechanism and involvement of serotonergic pathways, we tried to reverse the effect with ondansetron. Serotonergic receptors agonists specifically have been documented to reverse both hyperalgesia and allodynia in neuropathic pain models.^31,32 The thermal pain effect was reversed with ondansetron dose, implying the role of serotonergic pathways primarily 5HT₃ receptors in Figure 3. Serotonin plays a diverse role in pain modulation and control; primarily 5HT_1B antagonists are used clinically in pain, for instance, tramadol, which partially imparts its analgesia by blocking 5HT_1B.³³ Tramadol along with other opiates are extensively used for the management of acute, chronic, and neuropathic pain.^34–36 Additionally, tramadol has a serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SRI) effect that contributes to its analgesic effect.³⁶ Studies have also documented that, tramadol analgesia quality and duration were reversed by ondansetron.^27,37 More detailed receptor-specific studies are warranted using specified receptor antagonists for broader mechanistic studies. The acute thermal effect was also reversed by naloxone, implying some interactions with opioidergic pathways in Figure 4. It is pertinent to mention that reversal was made with 1 mg/kg naloxone and more studies are warranted to ascertain the involvement of specific opioid receptors.

Earlier studies have reported that some sulfonamides have analgesic, antihyperalgesic and antiallodynic effects, as well as a carbonic anhydrase inhibitory effect.^17,19 In modulation of pain and hyperalgesia, dopamine plays a major role in different areas of the brain including basal ganglia,³⁸ and it is one of the main sensitive pathways implicated in pain management.³⁹ Dopamine D1 receptor antagonist SCH-23,390 attenuate prostaglandin E2 (PGE₂) induced hyperalgesia and neuropathic allodynia.⁴⁰ Computationally, 4-FBS is a D1 receptor antagonist (support file 1) and it may be suggested that its anti-nociceptive, anti-allodynic activity is due to its antagonistic activity on the D1 receptor. Further studies are warranted to validate both the behavioral and in-silico studies on receptor level using D1 receptor antagonist.

Diabetic neuropathic pain (DPN) is manifested via distal symmetrical polyneuropathy, which is characterized by numbness, stabbing sensations, tingling pain, and weakness of nerves in a stocking-and-glove pattern, beginning in the distal extremities. DPN leads to substantial pain, hyperalgesia, and allodynia which leads to poor quality of life and has been reported to have involvement of the peripheral nervous system and alter central pain processing.⁴¹ The polymorphic nature of this disease deleteriously affects different areas in the central nervous system compromising the performance of other body systems. Overexpression of cyclooxygenases seen in diabetes significantly contributes to the severity of pain, hyperalgesia, and discomfort.^42,43 Its comorbidities including depression, anxiety, and insomnia make the treatment regimen problematic and challenging.^8,44 At present, more than 415 million people suffer from diabetes worldwide and 30–50% have chronic diabetic neuropathy, and approximately 15% with allodynia.^44,45 4-FBS significantly ameliorated thermal hyperalgesia at all doses in the animal model of DPN Figure 5 except at 120 min for 4-FBS 20 mg/kg. The compounds also showed a significant antiallodynic effect in diabetic neuropathic pain by reversing mechanical allodynia (Figures 6 and 7) except at 120 min for 4-FBS 20 mg/kg and 30 min for 4-FBS 40 mg/kg. Very few compounds have such a profile of reversing diverse types of pain and the compound effects resembling that of opiates.

4-FBS is a Carbonic anhydrase inhibitor²¹ and has been documented for a diverse role in neuropathic pain.¹⁹ Diabetic neuropathy leads to hyperalgesia and progressively results in allodynia. DPN is characterized by peripheral nerve injury, which negatively modulates spinal γ-aminobutyric (GABA)-ergic neuronal networks and causes a significant decrease in the neuron-specific potassium-chloride (K+-Cl−) co-transporter (KCC2), that translates in hyperalgesia and allodynia.¹⁰ Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (CAIs) have been documented to decrease the bicarbonate-dependent depolarization of γ-aminobutyric (GABA) GABA_A receptors, producing antiallodynic effects in neuropathic pain.^18,19

Acetazolamide along with many other carbonic anhydrase inhibitors has been reported for a role in the management of neuropathic pain through various pathways.¹⁶ 4-FBS has been reported to have a carbonic anhydrase inhibitory effect²¹ and this effect might be contributing partially to the analgesic properties of 4-FBS in the acute pain model as well as in diabetic neuropathic pain including both hyperalgesia and allodynia.

Limitations

These are purely behavioral studies and require more specific studies at the molecular level to explore the involvement of any specific opioid receptor, serotonergic receptor, or carbonic anhydrase inhibitory effects for its analgesic, antihyperalgesic and anti-allodynic, role in neuropathic pain models.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Acknowledgment

We thankfully acknowledge the language editing of the manuscript by Dr. Garcia Rivas University of Yale, USA.