814
Views
34
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Clinical importance of faecal calprotectin variability in inflammatory bowel disease: intra-individual variability and standardisation of sampling procedure

, , , &
Pages 548-555 | Received 11 Jun 2015, Accepted 03 Nov 2015, Published online: 04 Dec 2015
 

Abstract

Objective Faecal (f-) calprotectin is a biomarker of intestinal inflammation. Previous studies have described intra-individual day-to-day variability of this biomarker in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and morning samples have been suggested for standardisation purposes. With this project, we investigated if day-to-day variability differed from diurnal variability. Additionally, we evaluated a new extraction method for f-calprotectin analysis. Methods Fifty patients provided three faeces samples from morning – evening – morning on two consecutive days. Nineteen patients provided two faeces samples from the same bowel movement, one conventional spot sample, and one sample with a device for patient-administered sampling and extraction. Results The two morning samples differentiated between mucosal inflammation and mucosal healing with same level of agreement as the two samples from the same day (kappa 0.76), using an f-calprotectin cut-off level of 259 μg/g. Although large intra-individual variation in f-calprotectin values, there were no significant day-to-day (p = 0.096) or diurnal variation (p = 0.78). Used by laboratory technicians, the new extraction device correlated significantly with the conventional extraction method (p < 0.001), Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient 0.95. Of the 19 patients testing patient administered extraction, two patients provided samples leading to considerably higher f-calprotectin levels than conventional sampling procedure. Conclusions The reliability of f-calprotectin morning samples is equal to the reliability of samples from different bowel movements on the same day. The new extraction method is reliable when used by laboratory technicians, but larger studies are recommended to evaluate patient administered extraction.

Disclosure statement

AR has ownership in Calpro AS, Norway, and receives consultant fees from Bühlmann Laboratories AG, Switzerland.

The other authors report no conflict of interest.

Funding information

This work was supported by a grant from AbbVie Inc.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 336.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.