895
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Content validity of workplace-based portfolios: A multi-centre study

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 936-945 | Published online: 30 Jan 2016
 

Abstract

Background: Portfolios are used as tools to coach and assess students in the workplace. This study sought to evaluate the content validity of portfolios as reflected in their capacity to adequately assess achieved competences of medical students during clerkships.

Methods: We reviewed 120 workplace portfolios at three medical universities (Belgium and the Netherlands). To validate their content, we developed a Validity Inventory for Portfolio Assessment (VIPA) based on the CanMEDS roles. Two raters evaluated each portfolio and indicated for each VIPA item whether the portfolio provided sufficient information to enable satisfactory assessment of the item. We ran a descriptive analysis on the validation data and computed Cohen’s Kappa to investigate interrater agreement.

Results: The portfolios adequately covered the items pertaining to the communicator (90%) and professional (87%) roles. Coverage of the medical expert, collaborator, scholar and manager roles ranged between 75% and 85%. The health advocate role, covering 59%, was clearly less well represented. This role also exhibited little interrater agreement (Kappa < 0.4).

Conclusions: This study lends further credence to the evidence that portfolios can indeed adequately assess the different CanMEDS roles during clerkships, the health advocate role, which was less well represented in the portfolio content, excepted.

Acknowledgments

We wish to express our gratitude to all the experts who cooperated in this study. We also wish to thank the students for giving informed consent and hence granting access to their portfolios. In addition, we are grateful to the staff of the medical faculties of Maastricht University and Utrecht University who engaged in the validity study, in particular Prof. O. ten Cate, Dr M. Van den Acker and Dr T. van Haeften. The authors wish to thank Angelique van den Heuvel for editing the manuscript.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no declarations of interest.

Appendix 1. CanMEDS competency-based inventory.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 771.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.