Erratum

This article refers to:

Methodology for adaptive and robust FDG-PET escalated dose painting by numbers in head and neck tumors

Sarah Differding, Edmond Sterpin, Guillaume Janssens, François-Xavier Hanin, John Aldo Lee, Vincent Grégoire (2015) Methodology for adaptive and robust FDG-PET escalated dose painting by numbers in head and neck tumors. Acta Oncologica. Posted online on June 16, 2015. http://informahealthcare.com/doi/full/10.3109/0284186X.2015.1046997

When the above article was first published online, there were errors in Table 1 caused by superfluous percentage symbols. This has now been corrected in both the print and online versions as follows:

Table I. QVH metrics (V_{Q = 0.95}, V_{Q = 1.05}, QF, %) calculated for the dose-painted PTV_PET on pre-treatment images with a number of sub-contours increasing from 3 to 9 (jaw width 1 cm, pitch 0.43, planned MF of 3 corresponding to a mean actual MF of 2.49 ± 0.27).

Number of sub-contours	3	5	7	9
Patient 1
VQ = 0.95 (%)	92.7	96.3	95.8	97.1
VQ = 1.05 (%)	3.2	4.7	2.3	1.9
QF (%)	2.3	2.1	1.8	1.8
Patient 2
VQ = 0.95 (%)	86.9	92.2	97.1	92.9
VQ = 1.05 (%)	2.7	3.2	3.8	1.1
QF (%)	2.4	2.2	1.8	2.0
Patient 3
VQ = 0.95 (%)	94.5	94.9	95.9	96.7
VQ = 1.05 (%)	5.1	5.3	4.4	4.0
QF (%)	2.1	2.1	1.9	1.8
Patient 4
VQ = 0.95 (%)	86.2	94.8	97.0	97.2
VQ = 1.05 (%)	1.7	1.3	1.6	1.8
QF (%)	2.4	1.8	1.7	1.7
Patient 5
VQ = 0.95 (%)	85.4	87.2	91.6	90.8
VQ = 1.05 (%)	8.0	4.3	4.4	6.1
QF (%)	3.1	2.6	2.3	2.5

Taylor & Francis apologises for this error.