372
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Measuring real-ear signal-to-noise ratio: Application to directional hearing aids

, &
Pages 238-246 | Received 19 Nov 2009, Accepted 23 Aug 2009, Published online: 15 Feb 2010
 

Abstract

Abstract

Due to individual characteristics such as head size, earmould type, and earmould venting, the directional benefit that an individual will obtain from a hearing aid cannot be predicted from average data. It is therefore desirable to measure real ear directional benefit. This paper demonstrates a method to measure real ear hearing aid directivity based on a general approach to measure the broadband output signal-to-noise ratio of a hearing aid. Errors arising from non-linearity were tested in simulation and found to be low for typical hearing aid compression ratios. Next, the efficacy of the method to estimate directional benefit was demonstrated on KEMAR. Finally the variability of directional benefit was explored in real-ears. Significant differences in signal-to-noise ratio between directional and omnidirectional microphone settings were demonstrated at most azimuths. Articulation-Index-weighted directional benefit varied by more than 7 dB across ears at some azimuths. Such individual variation in directional benefit has implications when fitting hearing aids: it should not be assumed that all users will receive similar directional benefit from the same hearing aid.

Sumario

Debido a las características individuales, tales como tamaño de la cabeza, tipo de molde y de ventilación del molde, el beneficio direccional que un individuo obtendrá de un auxiliar auditivo no puede predecirse a partir de datos promedio. Es por tanto deseable medir el beneficio direccional en oído real. Este trabajo demuestra un método para medir la direccionalidad de un auxiliar auditivo en oído real, con base en un enfoque general que mide la relación señal-ruido de una salida de banda ancha en un auxiliar auditivo. Los errores surgidos de la no linealidad se evaluaron en simulación y resultaron bajos para las tasas de compresión típicas de un auxiliar auditivo. Luego, se demostró en el KEMAR la eficacia del método para estimar el beneficio de direccionalidad. Final-mente, la variabilidad del beneficio direccional se exploró en oído real. Se demostraron diferencias significativas en las tasas señal-ruido entre los micrófonos direccionales y omnidireccionales en la mayoría de los azimut. Sin embargo, el beneficio direccional ponderado por el Índice de Articulación varió en más de 7 dB en todos los oídos en algunos azimut. Tales variaciones individuales en el beneficio direccional tiene implicaciones cuando se adaptan auxiliares auditivos: no debe presuponerse que todos los usuarios recibirán un beneficio direccional similar del mismo auxiliar auditivo.

Declaration of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 194.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.