Measuring real-ear signal-to-noise ratio: Application to directional hearing aids

References

• Agnew J. & Block M. 1997. HINT thresholds for a dual-microphone BTE. Hear Rev, 4, 26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Alcántara J.I., Moore B.C., Kuhnel V. & Launer S. 2003. Evaluation of the noise reduction system in a commercial digital hearing aid. Int J Audiol, 42, 34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen L.A. 2000. Signal-to-noise ratio loss and directional-microphone hearing aids. Sem Hear, 21, 179–200.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon H. 2001. Hearing Aids. Sydney: Boomerang Press, 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Fortune T.W. 1997. Real-ear polar patterns and aided directional sensitivity. J Am Acad Audiol, 8, 119–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gatehouse S. & Robinson K. 1997. Speech tests as measures of auditory processing. In: M. Martin Speech Audiometry, London: Whurr Publishers Ltd, 74–88.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg J.E., Peterson P.M. & Zurek P.M. 1993. Intelligibility-weighted measures of speech-to-interference ratio and speech system performance. J Acoust Soc Am, 94, 3009–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman B. & Olofsson Å. 2004. A method to measure the effect of noise-reduction algorithms using simultaneous speech and noise. Acta Acustica, 90, 356–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins D.B. & Yacullo W.S. 1984. Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. J Sp Hear Dis, 49, 278–286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Killion M. 1997. The SIN report: Circuits haven't solved the hearing-in-noise problem. Hear J, 50, 28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Killion M.C., Staab W.J. & Preves D.A. 1993. Classifying automatic signal processors. Hear Instr, 41, 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Killion M.C., Schulein R., Christensen L.A., Fabry D., Revit L. . 1998. Real-world performance of an ITE directional microphone. Hear J, 51(4), 24–38.
   Google Scholar
• Knebel S.B. & Bentler R.A. 1998. Comparison of two digital hearing aids. Ear Hear, 19, 280–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochkin S. 1996. Customer satisfaction and subjective benefit with high-performance hearing aids. Hear Rev, 3, 16–26.
   Google Scholar
• Lutman M.E., Creeke S.A. & Bell S.L. 2005. Measuring effects of signal processing algorithms in non-linear hearing instruments using stationary and modulated signals. 21st Danavox Symposium, Kolding, Denmark, 125–137.
   Google Scholar
• Mims Voll L. 2000. Application of technology to improve signal-to-noise ratio. Sem Hear, 21, 157–166.
   Google Scholar
• Peters R.W., Moore B.C. & Baer T. 1998. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people. J Acoust Soc Am, 103, 577–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preves D. 2000. Hearing aids and listening in noise. Sem Hear, 21, 103–122.
   Google Scholar
• Ricketts T.A. 2000. Directivity quantification in hearing aids: Fitting and measurement effects. Ear Hear, 21, 45–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts T.A., Henry P.P. & Hornsby B.W. 2005. Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields. Ear Hear, 26, 473–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie S.D., Seewald R.C., Cornelisse L.E. & Miller S.M. 1998. Procedural considerations in the real-ear measurement of completely-in-the-canal instruments. J Am Ac Audiol, 9, 216–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siemens. 2003. Technical Data Prisma 2 M. (Siemens Audiologische Technik GmbH).
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi G., Martinez C.D., Beamer S., Bridges J., Noffsinger D. . 2007. Subjective measures of hearing aid benefit and satisfaction in the NIDCD/VA follow-up study. J Am Acad Audiol, 18, 323–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente M., Fabry D.A. & Potts L.G. 1995. Recognition of speech in noise with hearing aids using dual microphones. J Am Ac Audiol, 6, 440–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu Y.H. & Bentler R.A. 2007. Using a signal cancellation technique to assess adaptive directivity of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 496–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar