Lower prosthesis-specific 10-year revision rate with crosslinked than with non-crosslinked polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty

386,104 procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

Richard N de SteigerAustralian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Discipline of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide;School of Population Health and Clinical Practice, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, AustraliaCorrespondence[email protected]

Orhun Muratoglu Harris Orthopaedic Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USACorrespondence[email protected]

Michelle Lorimer Data Management and Analysis Centre, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, AustraliaCorrespondence[email protected]

Alana R Cuthbert Data Management and Analysis Centre, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, AustraliaCorrespondence[email protected]

Stephen E GravesAustralian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Discipline of Public Health, University of Adelaide, AdelaideCorrespondence[email protected]

Lower prosthesis-specific 10-year revision rate with crosslinked than with non-crosslinked polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty

386,104 procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Lower prosthesis-specific 10-year revision rate with crosslinked than with non-crosslinked polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty

386,104 procedures from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry

Reprints and Permissions

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date