Unmonitored Intrapartum Oxytocin Use in Home Deliveries: Evidence from Uttar Pradesh, India

References

• J Smith, D Merrill. Oxytocin for induction of labor. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 49(3): 2006; 594–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbourne DR, Prendiville WJ, Carroli G, et al., Prophylactic use of oxytocin in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001 (4:CD001808).
   Google Scholar
• GG Briggs, SR Wan. Drug therapy during labor and delivery, part 2. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacists. 63(15 June): 2006; 1131–1139.
   Google Scholar
• CEC den Hertog, ANJA de Groot, PWJ van Dongen. History and use of oxytocics. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 94(1): 2001; 8–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H Phillip, H Fletcher, M Reid. The impact of induced labour on postpartum blood loss. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 24(1): 2004; 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• E Sheiner, L Sarid, A Levy. Obstetric risk factors and outcome of pregnancies complicated with early postpartum hemorrhage: a population-based study. Journal of Maternal Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 18(3): 2005; 149–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M Oscarsson, I Amer-Wahlin, H Rydhstroem. Outcome in obstetric care related to oxytocin use. A population-based study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 85(9): 2006; 1094–1098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M Jonsson, SL Norden, U Hanson. Analysis of malpractice claims with a focus on oxytocin use in labour. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 86(3): 2007; 315–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N Chuni. Analysis of uterine rupture in a tertiary center in Eastern Nepal: lessons for obstetric care. Journal of Obstetric and Gynaecological Research. 32(6): 2006; 574–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Registrar-General India. Report of the Technical Group on Population Projections constituted by the National Commission on Population, Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner India. 2006
   Google Scholar
• S RamaRao, L Caleb, ME Khan. Safer maternal health in rural Uttar Pradesh: do primary health services contribute?. Health Policy and Planning. 16(3): 2001; 256–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. NFHS-3 (2005–06) Fact Sheets (Provisional Results). 2006. At: <http://mohfw.nic.in/nfhsfactsheet.htm> Accessed 5 April 2007
   Google Scholar
• P Jeffery, R Jeffery, A Lyon. Labour Pains and Labour Power: Women and Childbearing in India. 1989; Zed Books: London.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffery P, Jeffery R. Safe motherhood and/or the health care market: a twenty year perspective from UP. Paper presented at workshop on Post-Liberalization State in India. Stanford, June 2005. (Unpublished)
   Google Scholar
• M Sharan, D Strobino, S Ahmed. Intrapartum oxytocin use for labor acceleration in rural India. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 90: 2005; 251–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das A, Agarwal M, Tripathi K, et al. Use of pre-delivery injections during home deliveries in rural north India: implications for maternal and neonatal health programmes under NRHM. Paper presented at 10th International Women’s Health Meeting, New Delhi, 21–25 September 2005. (Unpublished)
   Google Scholar
• S Pinto. Development without institutions: ersatz medicine and the politics of everyday life in rural north India. Cultural Anthropology. 19(3): 2004; 337–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z Matthews, J Ramakrishna, S Mahendra. Birth rights and rituals in rural south India: care seeking in the intrapartum period. Journal of Biosocial Science. 37: 2005; 385–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A George, A Iyer, G Sen. Gendered health systems biased against maternal survival: preliminary findings from Koppal, Karnataka, India. Working Paper 253. 2005; Institute of Development Studies: Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• C Van Hollen. Birth on the threshold: childbirth and modernity in south India. 2003; University of California Press: Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• C Van Hollen. Invoking Vali: painful technologies of modern birth in South India. Medical Anthropology Quarterly. 17(1): 2003; 49–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LE Caleb. Women’s health in the postpartum period and the influence of infant gender on postpartum practices in a low-income community in Delhi, India. 1995; Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health: Baltimore.
   Google Scholar
• Registrar-General India. Sample Registration Bulletin 2006;41(1). New Delhi: Registrar-General India, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• International Institute for Population Sciences/ORC Macro. National Family Health Survey-2 1998–99: India. 2000; International Institute for Population Sciences/ORC Macro: Mumbai/Calverton, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Smit J. Millennium Development Goals: Progress in Asia and the Pacific 2006, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific, United Nations Development Programme, Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Registrar-General India. Maternal Mortality in India, 1997–2003: Trends, Causes and Risk Factors I. Registrar General/Centre for Global Health Research, University of Toronto. 2006
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. National Population Policy. 2000; Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India: New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. National Health Policy. 2002; Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India: New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Janani Suraksha Yojana: Features and frequently asked questions and answers as in October 2006. 2006; Maternal Health Division, Government of India: New DelhiAt: <http://mohfw.nic.in/dofw%20website/JSY_features_FAQ_Nov_2006.htm>. Accessed 9 April 2007
   Google Scholar
• International Institute for Population Studies. Facility Survey National Report under Reproductive and Child Health Project Phase II. IIPS. 2003 At: <www.rchindia.org/fs_india.htm>
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Uttar Pradesh Facility Survey 2002–2003. 2003; Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India: New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffery P, Jeffery R. “Money itself discriminates”: obstetric emergencies in the time of liberalisation. Contributions to Indian Sociology (Forthcoming)
   Google Scholar
• A Jesani. Social objectives of health care services: regulating the private sector. KS Prabhu, R Sudarshan. Reforming India’s Social Sector: Poverty, Nutrition, Health and Education. 2003; Social Science Press: New Delhi, 205–220.
   Google Scholar
• S Chakraborty. Private Health Provision in Uttar Pradesh, India. DH Peters, AS Yazbeck, RR Sharma. Better Health Systems for India’s Poor. 2002; World Bank: Washington DC, 257–277.
   Google Scholar
• SJ Jejeebhoy, L Caleb Varkey. Maternal health and pregnancy-related care. SJ Jejeebhoy. Looking Back, Looking Forward: A Profile of Sexual and Reproductive Health in India. 2004; Rawat Publications/Population Council: Jaipur/New Delhi, 44–87.
   Google Scholar
• S Mishra. Public health scenario in India. KS Parikh, R Radhakrishna. India Development Report 2004–05. 2005; Oxford University Press for Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research: New Delhi, 62–83.
   Google Scholar